1
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly
« on: February 04, 2023, 11:39:51 PM »
Wow you found something on the internet that agrees with you! How compelling.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I haven't seen that it is misinformation. That is exactly how the CDC defines it on their website:
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7021e3.htm#:~:text=For%20this%20surveillance%2C%20a%20vaccine,%2Dauthorized%20COVID%2D19%20vaccine.
“Further analysis showed that the average fully vaccinated German would reach minus-100% immune system degradation by the end of January 2022.“
This means that literally every fully vaccinated German would already be dead, so obviously this isn’t true.
No it does not.
'-100% degredation' is a double negative. So it means that fully vaccinated people will have 100% strong immune system.
This is the fallacy of "Trust the Science" and appeals to authority:
"When is the FBI going to raid the many homes of Joe Biden, perhaps even the White House? These documents were definitely not declassified."
Tap-Dancing Tom Bishop has to latch on to inappropriate hyperbole from Stack to cover up how shitty his source and argument are.
What's hyperbole to me is lying by claiming that 1600+ people died or were harmed by a vaccine when rafts of them have no evidence of being vaccinated. I mean, that's just an out and out lie.
Now my hyperbole may be that there shouldn't be a single error in the morbid list. But when I keep finding ones where the author even went to the trouble of linking to news articles as if proof of COVID Injections as the killer and no mention of COVID Injections is found, time and time again, it is clear the source is dubious at best and indefensible.
And, as typical of FE'ers, that explanation (no matter how reasonable) must be hand waved away.Hand-waved? Not at all. It's just strange that a magical lightsaber showed up in these very legitimate photos, and its existence was only retconned in after people pointed out that it looked strange.
That could just mean that he was giving patients expensive heart medication based on prior medical history or alternate tests without going through Medicaid's 1800's-level antiquated cardio tests designed to act as a barrier to allow only the most extreme cases through to the medicine, that Medicaid demands to perform before they dole out the cash.
There is a difference between blatant unethical fraud and pro-patient ethical fraud to protect them from a tyrannical government, and it is unclear what happened. Based on the ridiculous example of the throat swab test where the "fraud" was doing something ethical for the patient, the picture is pretty dim for the government's side.
The document is vague and unspecific about exactly what he did for a reason. Not a good reason.
I was just kidding earlier, but it seems as though Tom's position genuinely is that we can only go by Hannity outright declaring bluntly that it is his belief that the election was stolen. We can't interpret his words and actions in a reasonable manner. Only an outright declaration on his part is sufficient evidence.
Anyway
..
Pretty sure someone already posted this:
“And in the state of Michigan, Republicans are moving in to investigate this software glitch called Dominion that actually changed thousands of votes from Trump to Biden,” Hannity exclaimed on Nov. 9. “They caught it. Now, the same software also, quote, ‘glitched’ in Georgia and was used in as many as 28 states, according to John Solomon.”
Seems like he believed it to me.
The full quote to that shows that he was searching for answers and seeking an investigation, not that he came to the answer and was calling fraud:
https://www.mediamatters.org/media/3921896
And in the state of Michigan, Republicans are moving in to investigate this software glitch called Dominion that actually changed thousands of votes from Trump to Biden. They caught it. Now, the same software also, quote, “glitched” in Georgia and was used in as many as 28 states, according to John Solomon. We need real answers. Why should we, as a country, be OK when that happened? And shouldn't we investigate it so that every American has confidence in the outcome?
Yeah he was. Thats almost literally what he said.
"Why shoud we, as a country, be ok when that happened?" -stating its a fact that it happened.
He's saying "these glitches happened and we should investigste them so we know who really won the election"
Calling for an investigation and uncovering of answers is withholding judgement until an investigation can be conducted. In a court you are judged after the evidence is presented and the jury gives its verdict, not before. By calling for an investigation he is saying that he doesn't have the answers, and it needs to be investigated.
Ie: “Is Lord Dave a serial killer? We need answers. Everyone should be shocked by the eye witness claims. The claims need to be investigated.”
This is not calling you a serial killer. It is suggesting that it needs to be determined if you are one.
Anyway
..
Pretty sure someone already posted this:
“And in the state of Michigan, Republicans are moving in to investigate this software glitch called Dominion that actually changed thousands of votes from Trump to Biden,” Hannity exclaimed on Nov. 9. “They caught it. Now, the same software also, quote, ‘glitched’ in Georgia and was used in as many as 28 states, according to John Solomon.”
Seems like he believed it to me.
The full quote to that shows that he was searching for answers and seeking an investigation, not that he came to the answer and was calling fraud:
https://www.mediamatters.org/media/3921896
And in the state of Michigan, Republicans are moving in to investigate this software glitch called Dominion that actually changed thousands of votes from Trump to Biden. They caught it. Now, the same software also, quote, “glitched” in Georgia and was used in as many as 28 states, according to John Solomon. We need real answers. Why should we, as a country, be OK when that happened? And shouldn't we investigate it so that every American has confidence in the outcome?
If Sean Hannity lied, lets see the statements side by side. He recently said that he didn't believe Sydney Powell's claims:
https://uproxx.com/viral/sean-hannity-didnt-believe-sidney-powell-voter-fraud-claims/During a court hearing on Wednesday, before the case goes to jury trial in April, it was revealed that Hannity was asked if he bought the claims notorious Trump lawyer and Diet Dr. Pepper fanatic Sidney Powell had made about voter fraud, including on his own show.
“I didn’t believe it for a second,” Hannity replied under oath.
So for this to be a lie, where are the quotes showing that he did believe Sydney Powell's claims?