If I had to guess, I'd say it looks just slightly past 45deg. I could be underestimating and it could be closer to 60
The rotation is a bit quicker than I'd expect but maybe there's something we're not taking in to account.
The angle featured in the video on the rotation of Mars is at least 60 degrees, where even 46 degrees could not be explained at all.
What is the connection between Mars and planet Vulcan? Mars (Marduk) had fought with Pairika (Mus Parik) before, according to the astronomical observations made long ago.
The fact that now we can see Garuda (Vulcan/Pairika) in broad daylight in the sky means that there is something affecting the entire planetary system, and that something is referring to the first effects of the galactic wave (cosmic rays) which is beginning to manifest itself (just like in the past, that is why I did include those references to the Crab nebula).
Nothing else can explain the acceleration of the rotation of Mars.
ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATIONS OF PLANET GARUDA
Le Verrier, 1859:
https://armaghplanet.com/vulcan-the-solar-systems-ghost-planet.htmlLescarbault, 1959
Russell, 1860
(1876). An Intra-Mercurial Planet. Nature, 14(362):505
Covington, 1860
Lummis, 1862
Coumbary, 1865
Swift and Watson, 1878:
https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1953ASPL....6..291E&defaultprint=YES&filetype=.pdfIn fact, Swift and Watson (two oustanding American observational astronomers) had declared that they had seen TWO intra-mercurial planets (that's Garuda and its main satellite).
Then, after 1882, there were no more astronomical observations.
In a paper published just three days ago, Michael Lund of CalTech proposes that Garuda (Vulcan) had changed its orbit following the interaction with the great comet of 1882 and also comet Wells (1882):
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.20281.pdf"Simply put, Vulcan is no longer on the orbit that it was as of the middle of the 19th century, but is on an inclined orbit that would have placed it close to the sun, but outside of the narrow band alignedwith the sun’s equator that Campbell (1909) focused on."
"The first possibility, and the more straight forward one, is that Vulcan underwent a close gravitational interaction that significantly changed its orbit somewhere between
roughly 1880 and 1900."
"This provides the alternative possibility that through the von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai mechanism, Mercury was able to significantly excite the orbital inclination of Vulcan, resulting in Vulcan rarely being in line with the sun’s equator and outside the region that intramercurial planet searches had deliberately targeted."
He also notes that Einstein did not explain "the observations that had been made of Vulcan".
In fact, Le Verrier's original calculations stand correct, since the equations provided by GTR cannot be used to analyze dynamical systems:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2194405#msg2194405https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg769750#msg769750https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2194825#msg2194825https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2196454#msg2196454Then, starting about 2003, Garuda became active again and numerous photographs and videos were published depicting the FireBird next to the Sun.
Ancient astronomical text: Muspar (a fiery comet that loiters around the sun).
Definitely the acceleration of the rotation of Mars is related to the direct astronomical observations of planet Vulcan.