Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I don't think I've ever felt so satisfied with a game before. I don't feel like I want to convince anyone it's amazing, I don't feel like debating with anyone who thinks it isn't, I just feel happy that I played it and that I get to experience such a wonder.
I does currently have a 97% rating on metacritic too. I dont really play Zelda games, but this sounds phenomenal.
Why is Russia treated as a "cyber threat" when the real threat is the complete lack of cybersecurity in the DNC?
Because if foreign governments are allowed to influence US elections without consequence, it will continue to happen. Foreign governments will continue to leak information about whichever political party they don't want to win, and the American people will feel their election was fine because at least now they know the losing party's dirty laundry (forgetting that the other political party is most likely just as corrupt.)
Why are we more concerned about potential influence on an election than actual corruption?
Is a lack of cybersecurity really corruption?
Even if the "hacks" did influence the election, the people deserve to know what terrible shit their government is up to. This is just a convenient excuse for the DNC to absolve themselves of any guilt.
They deserve all the information, not information selectively presented to them by a foreign government in order to sway an election.
evidently they don't teach much reconstruction era american history in canada or finland.
Any credible argument I have seen comparing BLM to KKK has been making a de facto comparison. Whatever their ideologies, the expression has been uncomfortably similar.
It's too bad that same skepticism isn't extended to Pizzagate. :|
And he did it again. This is seriously autistic behavior.
With all the kickings on whims and this stuff, I genuinely can't tell if the IRC has any rules at all. Can we basically just kick and ban anyone we feel like? Like...can I just permaban Rushy or beardo or something
Whether or not the foetus/ zygote/ egg/ sperm wants life is irrelevant. The question is whether one has bodily autonomy, that is, do you have the right to decide what happens in your own body?
Even if a foetus was 100% cognisant and able to debate the finer details of Aristotelian philosophy I would still argue that the right to abortion be defended. Nobody has the right to force themselves upon your body without your consent, even if withdrawing that access results in their death.
That is a reprehensible argument. You are basically arguing that a woman has the right to kill a baby one day before birth.
The baby inside her is a living being as well. There are two people here, not just one. You are arguing that the termination of a baby, which wants to live, it perfectly fine, because it might temporarily inconvenience the mother. That is terrible. How could you favor termination of life over temporary inconvenience?
