[jimster]

One of the proof points in the wiki is Michelson-Morley. FE says electromagnetic acceleration explains why the sun appears to go down below the horizon yet is actually always circling above us. Since EA has no equations, experiments or explanations, can RE dismiss Michelson Morley by postulating an unknown force without equations, experiments or explanation? Seems only fair. Under the rule that you can invalidate observations without equations, experiments, or explanations, can't you make any claim on the shape of the earth?

[Pete Svarrior]

EA has no equations

Incorrect

experiments

False

or explanations

Unsubstantiated.

Jimster, I'm gonna be straight with you. We've received a few complaints about you repeatedly starting threads that are either made in abysmally poor faith, or which are straight up rehashes of your old posts. I haven't acted on these. I am now, politely, asking you to stop. The next response will be proportionately less polite.