1
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: Today at 03:45:00 AM »
If being remembered as an incoherent, rambling old man is a good thing, then Trump certainly nailed it.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Terrible Political Memes
« on: September 13, 2024, 12:00:48 AM »
3
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: September 08, 2024, 04:00:36 AM »Was it a public ceremony or a private ceremony? Where was Trump for the first two anniversary ceremonies?No one knows the anniversary date for the ceremony?Can you show me a public announcement for it posted prior to the date?But for some reason, he felt it was important to make his visit public...Here is a guy who cannot take a shit without the media trying to publicize it, and Dave is trying to pretend the wreath-laying ceremony at ANC was made public because of Trump.
Who the fuck you trying to zoom here, Dave? Don't you ever get tired of posting terrible shit?
4
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Terrible Political Memes
« on: September 04, 2024, 08:17:32 PM »
5
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: August 26, 2024, 02:23:45 AM »Is Kamala promising anything about JFK disclosure or Big Pharma? No? Then she won't be getting RFK's voters.Kamala has already taken on big pharma:
https://www.biopharmadive.com/news/kamala-harris-pharma-healthcare-president-ira/722286/
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/08/15/statement-from-vice-president-kamala-harris-on-lower-prescription-drug-prices/
As for JKF disclosure... Is that really one of the bigger problems facing voters today?
6
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Terrible Political Memes
« on: August 22, 2024, 01:57:11 AM »
8
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: August 01, 2024, 12:57:45 PM »I can only imagine his reaction to the one-drop rule.how is someone being biracial this confusing to youWait till he finds out what colour African Americans are
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-drop_rule
9
Flat Earth Theory / Re: The Conspiracy Theory of Space Travel being a Hoax
« on: January 29, 2024, 11:17:49 PM »If I perceive the Earth to be flat while I'm right up against it, why should I blindly assume that the alternative evidence is better?Have you heard of the story of the blind men and the elephant? It's generally not a good idea to draw definitive conclusions from limited data.
10
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Get a haircut, you hippie!
« on: January 26, 2024, 05:35:36 PM »
I think that it would greatly depend on whether it’s a public or private school. Public schools would be obligated to go with the state standard (CROWN Act), while private schools that aren’t beholden to state aid would have more freedom to enact their own standards.
11
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: January 24, 2024, 10:38:28 PM »
Look's like Trump's AI ain't quite so smart either.
https://twitter.com/billdmccarthy/status/1749854039112626653
12
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: January 17, 2024, 09:52:17 PM »
Trump has been in enough trials that you would think that he should know how to behave himself. Apparently not.
"Mr. Trump has the right to be present here. That right can be forfeited, and it can be forfeited if he is disruptive and if he disregards court orders," U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan told Trump and his attorney after the jury had left the courtroom. "Mr. Trump, I hope I don’t have to consider excluding you from the trial. I understand you are very eager for me to do that," the judge said.
"I would love it. I would love it," Trump responded.
"I know you would because you just can’t control yourself in this circumstance. You just can't," the judge shot back before an exasperated Trump threw his hands in the air.
13
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: January 10, 2024, 02:53:35 AM »
Trump might want to rethink his claim of absolute presidential immunity. Biden might just get some ideas about how to get Trump off of all the ballots once and for all.
"I asked you a yes or no question," the judge said. "Could a president who ordered SEAL Team Six to assassinate a political rival, who was not impeached, would he be subject to criminal prosecution?"
"If he were impeached and convicted first, and so — " Sauer began.
"So your answer is no," Pan said.
14
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: January 09, 2024, 11:34:42 PM »
Personally, I tend to take anything that Trump says with a grain of salt, doubly so for any second hand stories that he tells. Not trying to drag this too far off topic, but it should be well known by now that the USS Ford is a first in its class ship that is including an awful lot of new technology and its growing pains are to be expected. Sure, the electromagnetic catapults and landing systems (among many other new systems) have been problematic, but are necessary because the old steam powered systems can't be dialed down enough to launch and recover the much smaller and lighter UAVs that are becoming more and more common and important to the future of naval warfare.
I wonder if Trump is somehow trying to blame the woes of the Ford class on Biden when so much of the ship's history spans several Republican administrations, including his own.
I also like how Trump keeps claiming that presidents need immunity, but he did nothing wrong. If he didn't do anything wrong, then why would he need immunity? It seems to me that
I wonder if Trump is somehow trying to blame the woes of the Ford class on Biden when so much of the ship's history spans several Republican administrations, including his own.
I also like how Trump keeps claiming that presidents need immunity, but he did nothing wrong. If he didn't do anything wrong, then why would he need immunity? It seems to me that
15
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: January 09, 2024, 05:24:45 AM »
A glass of water is hardly comparable to a giant wave crashing over the bow. Then again, it wouldn’t be a Trump speech without over the top hyperbole, would it?
16
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: January 09, 2024, 02:38:53 AM »It depends on the kind of magnet. It is also my understanding that if you expose the type of magnets to water in the referenced maglev elevator project that it will stop working.Trump was apparently talking about the electromagnetic elevators and catapult systems on the new Gerald Ford class aircraft carriers. Why would Trump (or you) think that the US Navy wouldn't make sure that the electromagnetic systems on the newest generation aircraft carriers are waterproof?
17
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: January 08, 2024, 10:05:24 PM »
Trump supporters claim that Biden's mental abilities have diminished, and then Trump says this:
https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1743463970621862227
18
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: January 07, 2024, 06:00:46 AM »Looks like it was not noticed that the 14th Amendment insurrection clause was repealed by Congress over a hundred years ago -
Maybe it was and maybe it wasn't.
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment has been invoked only twice since the American Civil War: in 1919 and 1920, it blocked Victor L. Berger, a member of the Socialist Party who had won both elections, from taking office as the Representative from Wisconsin because he had been convicted of violating the Espionage Act of 1917.[7] Although Section 3 was applicable to Berger, it does not appear that the Amnesty Act of 1872 was considered. Thus, it is not entirely clear whether this Act also automatically removes political disability for subsequent actions that violate Section 3.
19
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: January 06, 2024, 01:35:57 AM »
Absolute Presidential ImmunityTM protects Trump from the emolument clause, doesn't it?
20
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: January 01, 2024, 12:16:15 AM »As much as Trump would love to run out the clock and get himself reelected so that he can pardon himself (at least from the federal charges), he has another problem. There is still the question of whether or not section 3 of the 14th amendment applies. My guess is that will likely be the first, and potentially more important, Trump related case to reach SCOTUS.I just can't see SCOTUS ruling against Trump on that. They can just lean on the language and be done with it.
Of course team Trump is crying that states shouldn't be deciding constitutional matters, but it is the states that actually run their elections.
It looks like Trump's immunity appeal is a bit premature and will hopefully be dismissed because he hasn't been found guilty yet.
As the American Oversight amicus brief argues, Supreme Court precedent prohibits a criminal defendant from immediately appealing an order denying immunity unless the claimed immunity is based on “an explicit statutory or constitutional guarantee that trial will not occur.” Trump’s claims of immunity rests on no such explicit guarantee. Therefore, given that Trump has not been convicted or sentenced, his appeal is premature. The D.C. Circuit lacks appellate jurisdiction and should dismiss the appeal and return the case to district court for trial promptly.