21

Flat Earth Community / Re: That's how the moon landing and the ISS is being faked without demonization.

« on: July 21, 2016, 09:31:24 AM »

ok then if the iss is real then how did Chris hadfield do a live performance on his guitar from the space station in perfect time with a band back on earth ? Surely there should be a couple of seconds time delay because there is always a few seconds time delay when nasa are talking to the iss. Because of how far up they are meant to be(253) miles above our heads. So there is no way Chris hadfield could of been able to do that and sing in perfect time with the band on earth (live aswell ) unless he was somewhere on earth. Plus astronaughts suits are able to withstand -200 plus degrees (because that's how cold it is up there) but when they land back here on earth they put a blanket around them? Wtf they should be sweating back here on earth and how would a blanket effect a suit able to withstand -200 degrees? Plus there is no footage (with the technology we got today) of an astronaught exiting the space station into space and filming a 360 degree view of our so called planet why not?(unedited video)

22

Flat Earth Theory / Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?

« on: July 21, 2016, 08:30:00 AM »

Plus where is your sound evidence that were on a ball ? What maybe photos from nasa? Show me one unedited photo of our ball earth without the use of photoshop or cgi.cmon open your eyes.another example is there is supposed to be thousands of satellites in space but how come when you watch live feed of the iss you never ever see any? plus so many independent rockets , balloons have been sent up (without fish eye lense camera) and there is no curvature detected anywhere and the horizon is always eye level if we were on a ball you would have to look down because of the so called curvature but no matter how high you go the horizon remains the same.im not saying we are dead flat all I'm saying is it ain't a ball like we're told it is

23

Flat Earth Theory / Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?

« on: July 21, 2016, 08:09:01 AM »

ok then if we are indeed on a ball how come you cannot detect any curvature? Yes of course we have hills and elavations. And water will always find its level (flatness) it cannot be curved it can't have a hump in it.e.g.from California to Hawaii it is 2,467 miles. Between the two states there should be a "hump" of 770 miles if we're on a globe!! No hump is possible in water use your eyes that's why it's called sea level not sea curve..
"Create a belief in the theory and the facts will create themselves" (Joseph jastow 1935)

Plus there was a study in Kansas where they measured it to be flatter than a pancake.they measured it from west to east and it is approximately 420 miles across so going with the measurements of the earth we can't be a ball because it would be impossible to have a distance of that greatness to be flat! it should have a curvature of at least 22miles across in a distance of 420 miles but it's dead flat.Hundreds of miles of flatness with little change in elevation in several states across America ... And we're on a ball? What kind of ball is that then? Same as ships don't vanish over the horizon they come back into view with any decent telescope or binoculars ,earths atmosphere gives us limited visibility.

24

Flat Earth Theory / Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?

« on: July 20, 2016, 09:22:18 PM »

"The theory of relativity is just a mass of error and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the teachings of great men of science of the past and even to common sense.The theory wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent Garb which fascinates,dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying error"
       Nikola Tesla .

You are not on a ball let alone a spinning one.planets are not what you think they are.The stars rotate above us and return to their same positions year after year and have done so for eternity.The horizon is always eye level no matter how high you are and that is only possible on a flat plane.the small sun and moon rotate above us clockwise

25

Flat Earth Theory / Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?

« on: July 20, 2016, 08:27:36 PM »

ok then globe earthers the circumference of the earth with your measurements e.g. 24,901miles with a radius of 3,959miles the curvature Equation of a ball earth with mainstream science measurements 8 inches per mile multiplied by the distance squared miles.example 8 inches x 50miles ^2       8 inches x 2500=20000 inches /12feet =1666feet meaning there should be 1666feet of curvature along the distance of 50 miles 60 miles=2400feet of curvature
70 miles =3266feet of curvature
80miles = 4256 feet of curvature
90 miles = 5400 feet of curvature
100 miles = 6666 feet of curvature
So taking mainstream science calculations into account the salt flats of Bolivia are 100 miles in length by about 80 miles in width so take into account the measurements of the earth then at 100 miles the curvature should be as above 6666 feet that's 1.2 miles yet it only drops by 3feet over the whole surface this alone proves we are not a spheroid because the definition of sphere in geometry is " a three dimensional shape that looks like a ball ". "A solid that is bounded by a surface consisting of all points at a given distance from a point constituting it's centre". Basically means no straight lines even at a micro scale of a ball. So if we're on a spinning ball how come we got so much flatness of hundreds of miles just a thought for you ball earthers to ponder over .

26

Flat Earth Theory / Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?

« on: July 20, 2016, 07:57:11 PM »

There has been a distinct lack of flat earthers trying to defend the flat earth theory on this forum lately. Are there any out there with evidence for a flat earth that hasn't been recently debunked?

(Intikam doesn't count, obviously)