[FE-Experiments]

none

[Jura-Glenlivet]

Orbi has asked the same (similar at least) in his constellations question on this board, but he has gone a bit quiet, see the answers there and see if you can get him to tell you how his observations are coming along.

[Orbisect-64]

According to the current scientific model (philosophy), some of the things that look like stars in the sky are other galaxies and stars outside of the milky way.

According to the laws of parallax (which modern science breaks all the time) all the stars outside of the galaxy should move different than those inside. . .   but THEY DO NOT.  ALL the stars move around in perfect synchronicity, and the moon moves wight in harmony with them, even though the moon is said to be far closer than the stars that they tell us are trillions of lightyears away.

This paradox only exists because it's all a lie that does not reflect the truth.

Take a look at the tea cup ride.






The other cups outside of your cup are moving, but you can just about make out the people inside them. Yet all objects completely outside of the whole ride are going past at a completely different rate—hence you can not make out the detail of any objects outside of the ride.

So here we are "on a spinning earth." Everything outside of the galaxy should be moving differently than the things inside the galaxy—this is how parallax works. . .  But this is not the case, rather, all things move together in harmony, as if they were interconnected or something. . .  because they are.

Furthermore, because they say that galaxies move through space, every year we should be seeing new galaxies and stars outside of the milky way—to say otherwise would be like saying "we don't move 5,094,842,280 miles through space in one year," and now you would be disagreeing with Satan, sorry I meant NASA.

According to their system, we and the galaxy have traveled 5,094,842,280 miles in one year. . .  And yet, when we get back to our starting point at the end of the year, all the stars magically reset themselves right back to where they were at the beginning of the year - yet we’re 5,094,842,280 miles away from our starting point.

We really need to acknowledge how ludicrous this claim is, and how foolish and gullible we would be to continue buying into this level of foolishness.

The philosophical model of the universe breaks all the laws of parallax, and we do not SEE what they tell us we see.


—

[Jura-Glenlivet]

There are many sites you can get star charts for the day and your position,

 http://www.heavens-above.com/

Is a good one, it is primarily a satellite tracking site but if you register, put your (or any) position in it will give you a star chart for any day of the year you specify, you can then check against what you observe.
It will also give you timings of the ISS/satellites fly pasts should you want to check they are where they say they are.

[Sup3rbuck]

Yes.
Here in Northern Europe a constellation like the Orion's Belt are much higher in the sky in
Winter months than in the summer? 
Or at least that's what I remember. I could be wrong but don't think so.
Now in the wintertime where it gets dark at 18:00 o'clock (24h time)
The Orion constellation is visible at 19:00 hours.

How does this work in the FE theory?

Perhaps I don't see the constellations in the summer because of the sun overpowering
The stars?