Is it because staying on space stations taught us that we don't know enough about what extended periods of micro gravity environments do to us, thus limiting the progress of space tourism?
Staying in "space," for over a year does not constitute an "extended period."
Wow...
Your lack of thinking prior to posting is baffling...
Ad hominem, that's a new one.
Hey, Copernicus:
You were offering the point in response, as a possible reason for the non-existence of space hotels.
How does that make my response non-topical?
So, to recap:
1) I correctly interpret a manned "space mission," lasting for over year = "extended period."
2) I post a fact, stating you could not have possibly thought the issue through prior to posting.
3) You get butt - hurt.
Do I have that correct?
Yeah.
You are the one claiming a manned "space mission," lasting over a year does not constitute an "extended period."
You can go ahead and change the terminology to "long duration."
That makes the statement this:
"Is it because staying on space stations taught us that we don't know enough about what long duration of micro gravity environments do to us, thus limiting the progress of space tourism?"
To which, I reply:
"..Staying in "space," for over a year does not constitute "long duration.""
Wow...
Your lack of thinking prior to posting is baffling..."
See how that works?
Why not just admit you did not think your post through?