1

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Simple Experiments

« on: April 21, 2021, 05:15:31 PM »

The way UA works, as I understand it is that if I jump off a chair I wouldn't fall because there is no gravity to pull me down.  I'd just hang there and the floor would rise up to meet me.  Why would a dropped water bottle be any different?

No.  This.

According to UA, the bottle should just hang there, with the water pouring from the holes until the earth reaches it.

2

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Simple Experiments

« on: April 20, 2021, 10:33:28 PM »

According to UA, the bottle should just hang there, with the water pouring from the holes until the earth reaches it.

The Shobijin have summoned me here.  Please explain.  How does UA make this so?

3

Flat Earth Theory / Re: About the conspiracy

« on: April 05, 2021, 12:52:07 PM »

Lack of a solution to a multi-body problem disproves round earth yet lack of a simple curve equation doesn't disprove EA.  Quite interesting logic.

4

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is there anything that RET cannot explain?

« on: March 27, 2021, 01:14:25 AM »

Saying the inability to mathematically solve the N-body problem is proof that RET is incorrect is the same as saying that weather doesn't exist because humans have yet to invent a 100% accurate way to model it.

What's that? Oh, the Shobijin are calling.  I must leave now.

5

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is there anything that RET cannot explain?

« on: March 22, 2021, 01:02:10 AM »

If the greatest mathematicians have not been able to get this gravity system to work, why should anyone believe that this system exists?

And the Bishop's constant is ??

6

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is there anything that RET cannot explain?

« on: March 21, 2021, 04:11:34 PM »

RET can not explain the power of Shobijin to summon me.

7

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Simple Experiments

« on: March 16, 2021, 11:26:21 PM »

I can stay silent on this no longer.

Like the moon tilt illusion, the pointing spheres illusion is just that, an illusion.  It only works when one views it in a single plane.  Like the string, once Little Mothra joins the picture the illusion is broken.



The only object seen in the correct orientation, pointing in a straight line at the source, by red, white, and bug at the same time is the orange cone.

8

Flat Earth Investigations / Re: The bi-polar FE maps in the wiki/faq

« on: March 08, 2021, 02:31:25 AM »

Why do you find it amusing that our side requires evidence and your side does not?

'Tis not the requirement of evidence 'tis the ignoring of evidence that is comedic.

9

Flat Earth Investigations / Re: The bi-polar FE maps in the wiki/faq

« on: March 08, 2021, 12:10:32 AM »

I don't see any reason for why anything should be assumed without evidence.

As one who most enjoys simply being a bug on the wall, I must admit I find your requiring evidence of something that's been known for centuries to be a most amusing.

10

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Simple Experiments

« on: February 21, 2021, 11:05:06 PM »

From what I’ve seen as I try to familiarize myself with what’s in the WIKI is that many of the drawings are drawn with just enough inaccuracy to hide what would actually happen. The above drawing is slightly inaccurate. What is shown is a 1st quarter moon but the center high moon should have the terminator vertical not slanted. This would make the lit side of the moon point straight up when viewed at rise from the west and straight down at set from the east if the drawing was accurate.  Someone else would have to verify this as I live between two mountain ranges so I can not view the moon when it rises or sets on the flat earth. Also, it only depicts what would happen due east and west but not how the moon would be seen at higher latitudes.

If a top down image was drawn showing the sun lighting half the moon and the show the moons circular viewing area on a flat earth I believe that you would notice that the higher latitudes would actually see a significantly different moon tilt.