[maystre]

Modern official scientists try to teach us , that Earth not a Center Of Universe .
This point of view treat Earth as just a small object in Universe . And ,
moreover - that an Universe don't have a Center at all . Modern official
science teach us , that every moving in Universe is relative and no absolute
moving at all .

But this official point of view is very easy to refute .

For example , we have a physical system of two identical electrically charged
particles , which both motionless relative to the Earth in a starting moment ,
and this system is motionless relative to the Earth . What will be in such
a system ? Empirical observation is easy to know - in such a system will be
a REPULSION between the particles . This empirical fact named as
<<Coulomb's law>> .

And , in comparison - we have another system of two identical electrically
charged particles , but this system is moving relative to the Earth with
constant speed in one direction . What will be in such a system ? Moving
charges are electrical currents , and they moving in one direction . Empirical
observation will be so - in such a system will be an ATTRACTION between
the particles . This empirical fact named as <<Ampere's force law>> .

So , what we can see ? If a physical system motionless relative to the point -
there is REPULSION in a system . And if the same system is moving relative
to the point - there is ATTRACTION in a system .

This empirical fact strictly refutes a so called "principle of relativity" of modern
physics .

If our planet moving across the Sun ( as official science teach us ) , than two
identical electrically charged particles ( which both are motionless relative
to the the Earth ) - they both must be moving relative to the the Sun. If so ,
they must be DIRECT CURRENTS relative to the Sun ( cause moving charges
are currents ) . And these currents MUST BE ATTRACTED , because it's an
AMPERE'S LAW ! But we can empirically see , that these particles REPULSED ,
because they are motionless relative to the Earth , and this is COULOMB'S
LAW !

So , if we beliving in a "Earth moving" - than we have a contradiction . Two
direct currents must be attracted , but they repulsed ( because they are
motionless particles ) .

This contradiction have only one solution . Charged particles , which motionless
relative to the Earth , CAN'T BE INTERPRETED AS CURRENTS . This possible only
when they NOT EXPERIENCED ANY MOVING , when they motionless relative
to the Earth .

Objects , which motionless relative to the Earth , CAN'T BE INTERPRETED AS
MOVING !

EARTH IS AN ABSOLUTELY MOTIONLESS OBJECT .

Or , by the other words - Earth is a Center Of Universe .

It is a strict conclusion from the comparison of Coulomb's and Ampere's laws .

[Dog]

1. Ampere's Law describes the creating of magnetic fields by moving currents, not "an ATTRACTION between the particles".

2. You can't use electric/magnetic laws to describe planetary motion the way you have done.

[maystre]

1. Ampere's Law describes the creating of magnetic fields by moving currents, not "an ATTRACTION between the particles".

Well , what is current ? It is a moving charge . If two charges moving in one direction ,
they must attracted . You can see this , if you suspended two charges on a ceiling of
you car . When a car stands , two particles repulsed . And when a car moved -
two particles attracted .

2. You can't use electric/magnetic laws to describe planetary motion the way you have done.

I do not describe planet as a charge . I describe planet only as a system , in which
two charges interacted . And if Earth is moving - than moving a system . And charges
in moving system MUST attracted . But they don't attracted . Ergo - system not moving .

[Dog]

Well , what is current ? It is a moving charge . If two charges moving in one direction ,
they must attracted . You can see this , if you suspended two charges on a ceiling of
you car . When a car stands , two particles repulsed . And when a car moved -
two particles attracted .

Nope. If 2 charges are moving in one direction it is usually because of an electric potential difference (Voltage) or because it is in a magnetic field. Simply being in motion does not cause "two particles attracted".

I do not describe planet as a charge . I describe planet only as a system , in which
two charges interacted . And if Earth is moving - than moving a system . And charges
in moving system MUST attracted . But they don't attracted . Ergo - system not moving .

You can't use electric/magnetic laws to describe planetary motion the way you have done.

[Rama Set]

1. Ampere's Law describes the creating of magnetic fields by moving currents, not "an ATTRACTION between the particles".

Well , what is current ? It is a moving charge . If two charges moving in one direction ,
they must attracted . You can see this , if you suspended two charges on a ceiling of
you car . When a car stands , two particles repulsed . And when a car moved -
two particles attracted .

2. You can't use electric/magnetic laws to describe planetary motion the way you have done.

I do not describe planet as a charge . I describe planet only as a system , in which
two charges interacted . And if Earth is moving - than moving a system . And charges
in moving system MUST attracted . But they don't attracted . Ergo - system not moving .

To describe the attraction between two particles using electromagnetic forces there is really only one theory: Quantum Electrodynamics. Ampere's Law is a classical theory and will not accurately describe quantum mechanical effects.

[maystre]

Nope. If 2 charges are moving in one direction it is usually because of an electric potential difference (Voltage) or because it is in a magnetic field. Simply being in motion does not cause "two particles attracted".

Yea ? Empirical observations vs your opinion - whose side I must choose ?

You can't use electric/magnetic laws to describe planetary motion the way you have done.

I do not "use electric/magnetic laws to describe planetary motion" . I use these laws
to show , that if "Earth is moving" - than both these laws must be run at one time
at the case of interaction of two charges . I.e. , charges must be repulsed and attracted
simultaneously . But empirical observations show us , that happens only one thing .
Sapienti sat .

[maystre]

To describe the attraction between two particles using electromagnetic forces there is really only one theory: Quantum Electrodynamics. Ampere's Law is a classical theory and will not accurately describe quantum mechanical effects.

To describe the interaction between two charges - these is only one thing enough :
empirical observations . Ampere's and Coulomb's laws - are ampirical facts .