Its more like RET is claiming something without evidence.
*sigh*
This sort of argument is so tiresome. It always goes the same.
RE: Claim
FE: There is no evidence for that.
RE: There's loads of evidence for that *provides sources*
FE: Those sources are fake/wrong *provides some dubious source from someone with a blog with know scientific argument*
And then you run off claiming victory.
If you dismiss or call fake all evidence which shows you to be wrong then you can "prove" yourself right about anything.