If you have evidence showing a discoidal shape you should offer it.Here is the ultimate proof: the shape of the Sun is not spherical.
Precise calculations, using the Clayton equation:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1939765#msg1939765If the Sun has a discoidal shape, then so must all of the other planets (including Jupiter).
Evidence? We can measure the Ganymede, Callisto, Io, Europa orbit periods around Jupiter from Earth.... Ganymede 7.1 days, Callisto 16.7 days, Europa 3.6 days, Io 1.8 days. Right.
According to which law of gravitation do these satellites orbit around Jupiter?
It cannot be an attractive law of gravitation.
Here is the flux of gravitons paradox, (how a three body system cannot function given the attractive gravity scenario) - for a better visualization, use Sun - Jupiter - Io
"OBJECTIVE: Demonstrate that this interchange of gravitational particles again will seem to result in violations of conservation of energy. We will do this by demonstrating that, if matter is indeed influenced by gravitational particles, then,
even under normal orbital conditions, gravity should decrease, due to a gravitational shadowing effect. This shadowing effect would violate conservation of energy.Thought Experiment: IMAGINE THAT GRAVITONS BEHAVE LIKE PHOTONS
(for descriptive purposes only)
To better visualize how this partial gravitational influence might be encountered, let us describe gravity and gravitational interaction in terms of light, so that:
If gravitons exist, violations of the Law of Conservation of Energy will almost certainly occur.
Brilliance of light = gravitational attraction = (emission of gravitons)
Decreasing Transparency = Increasing Density and Mass
In this thought experiment, we will specify one sun, one earth and one moon. Each will be partially luminous, to simulate their 'output' of gravitons, and each will also be partially opaque, to indicate their 'capturing-of' or their 'reception-of' gravitons. We would then have the following description of the system.
In this imaginary system, the moon orbits the earth, and the earth-moon pair orbits the sun. Since glow will simulate gravity emitted, we could describe this sun as glowing brighter that this earth, and this earth as glowing brighter than the moon.
In addition, the moon would be more transparent than the earth, and the earth would be less transparent than the sun. This would simulate the increasing 'interception' of gravity, with an increase of both the density and mass from the moon, to the earth then to the sun in our imaginary example.
In this example, the light from the sun would 'attract' the earth and the moon (simulating the pull of gravity). The earth would glow less brilliantly than the sun, but still brighter than the moon. The moon would be attracted to both the earth and the sun, but would orbit the earth. The earth moon pair would then orbit the sun together.
In this example, the moon would spend more time in the earth's shadow, and the earth's shadow would be comparatively darker than the moon's shadow.
Since the moon would be attracted to the sun only by the light from the sun, and the light emitted by the earth with the sun shining through the less transparent earth would be less than the light emitted by the sun directly, the moon would gain some amount of orbital distance from the sun every time the moon 'hid' in the earth's shadow.This gain of gravitational energy, simulated in this example with light and transparency, {for visual purposes only}, would violate conservation of energy.
If gravitons exist, they must self-condradictingly pass through nearer masses unaffected, so as not to decrease gravity for masses at a further distance, while still interacting with those closer masses at the same time.Otherwise, we are left with the choice that masses at a distance will randomly gain some gravitational potential energy depending on whether randomly distributed nearer masses create a gravitational 'shadow' effect. We are once again led to the conclusion that gravitons, if they exist, must create violations of conservation of energy. This is hardly a reliable theoretical endorsement of gravitons, when conservation of energy must fall by the wayside in order to allow gravitons to exist. A much more logical conclusion is again, gravitons do not exist, and cannot exist. Some other method of explaining gravitational interactions must be needed."