According to the flat Earth theory, what we consider as the Earth's gravity is in fact a mysterious force below the flat Earth which continuously pushes the flat Earth upwards.
So when something falls to the ground, or when the Earth pulls something towards it via its gravitational force, it is in fact the flat Earth catching up with and touching that object.
So if that is the case, why hasn't the flat Earth smashed into the celestial bodies then?
Also, what is below the flat Earth, how big/deep is it, and for how long has the mentioned force been pushing the flat Earth upwards?
Also, in this day and age when people video record and photograph everything, why haven't any flat Earthers travelled westward or eastward to the ice wall and documented this ice wall and their journey on camera? (I'm not saying going southward to Antarctica or northward to the North Pole)
How far away are the dome and the stars, how large are the stars, and how large are the planets that revolve around the sun?
Are the stars like the sun and do planets revolve around them like how planets revolve around the sun?
What does TFET say about comets/asteroids/meteors, dinosaurs, and evolution and how old the Earth/universe/existence is and how it came about and how life came about?
What is beyond the dome and ice wall, does the flat Earth spin in a circle or is it still, and is it possible for man to send spacecraft to and to visit the moon, planets, other celestial bodies, and the dome and to maybe even go beyond the dome? (According to TFET, the moon landings are fake)
Does the modern scientific consensus of gravity apply to the planets that revolve around the sun in TFET?
Why would governments lie to their people about existence and hide the truth from them if TFET is correct, why is it that TFET is promoted only by a tiny fringe of nobodies and that nobody prominent/significant has promoted TFET since the late 19th century, and why doesn't the Bible/Christianity, Judaism, and Islam very clearly lay out the basics of TFET as the truth of our existence instead of being either very vague or not saying anything at all regarding the true nature of the Earth/universe?