*

Offline xasop

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 9776
  • Professional computer somebody
    • View Profile
Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #60 on: December 30, 2014, 03:37:06 PM »
The two societies' forums will be merged by way of tfes.org inheriting theflatearthsociety.org's database. The resultant forum will remain under the current administration, moderation and rules of tfes.org.

Does this mean that I will be effectively demodded?

All else being equal, yes, but we will be reviewing the moderator selection to account for reunification at some stage (possibly on tfes.org before actual reunification takes place). We will most likely keep the most active moderators from both forums, but this will be treated separately from reunification because the merged forum will be under our control.

What precisely this means I can't say, because we haven't yet made any decisions on this matter, so I can't say for certain whether you would still be a moderator post-reunification.
when you try to mock anyone while also running the flat earth society. Lol

*

Offline Pongo

  • Most Educated Flat-Earther
  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
    • View Profile
Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #61 on: December 30, 2014, 03:58:02 PM »
The two societies' forums will be merged by way of tfes.org inheriting theflatearthsociety.org's database. The resultant forum will remain under the current administration, moderation and rules of tfes.org.

Does this mean that I will be effectively demodded?
I forgot you existed.

That's a pretty harsh response after all the EXCELLENT moderating I did for you in regards to harassment issues in the past.

For what it's worth, mod or not, I'm still in favor of reunification.  The under forums are so stale without all you Morlocks.

*

Offline rooster

  • *
  • Posts: 4139
    • View Profile
Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #62 on: December 30, 2014, 04:29:03 PM »
That's a pretty harsh response after all the EXCELLENT moderating I did for you in regards to harassment issues in the past.

For what it's worth, mod or not, I'm still in favor of reunification.  The under forums are so stale without all you Morlocks.
Yeah, I remember that now. I removed the comment because I realized you must just be moding/active on the other forum which I never go to anymore. Carry on.

*

Offline Pete Svarrior

  • e
  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 16073
  • (◕˽ ◕ ✿)
    • View Profile
Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #63 on: January 03, 2015, 07:55:50 PM »
Okay, it seems like the discussion is mostly over now, and the one-week period has passed. Despite some concerns raised, I can't see a way to amend the proposal to satisfy those while still keeping things realistic and acceptable to the other side's stakeholders. If you feel that we haven't addressed an issue sufficiently, feel free to raise it again, but please avoid simply restating something or saying "I still don't like <x>". We're also still happy to answer questions if anything seems unclear.

Let's move to a vote. To keep things transparent, please vote by way of posting yes or no here (ideally in bold). We'll tally the votes no sooner than 7 days from now. Simple majority wins, and abstentions are functionally identical to not voting at all.

That said, I will be abstaining myself.
Read the FAQ before asking your question - chances are we already addressed it.
Follow the Flat Earth Society on Twitter and Facebook!

If we are not speculating then we must assume

Offline Blanko

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2471
    • View Profile
Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #64 on: January 03, 2015, 07:56:20 PM »
yes

Ghost of V

Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #65 on: January 03, 2015, 08:02:36 PM »
yes

*

Offline Foxbox

  • *
  • Posts: 956
  • We live inside a dream.
    • View Profile
Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #66 on: January 03, 2015, 08:04:01 PM »
Yes

*

Offline Tom Bishop

  • Zetetic Council Member
  • **
  • Posts: 10637
  • Flat Earth Believer
    • View Profile
Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #67 on: January 03, 2015, 08:34:25 PM »
Yes

*

Offline spoon

  • *
  • Posts: 1134
  • Foxy wins
    • View Profile
inb4 Blanko spoons a literally pizza

*

Offline markjo

  • *
  • Posts: 7849
  • Zetetic Council runner-up
    • View Profile
Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #69 on: January 03, 2015, 08:53:25 PM »
Tak
« Last Edit: January 03, 2015, 09:10:25 PM by markjo »
Abandon hope all ye who press enter here.

Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge. -- Charles Darwin

If you can't demonstrate it, then you shouldn't believe it.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7653
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #70 on: January 03, 2015, 08:56:18 PM »
Yes
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

*

Offline Pete Svarrior

  • e
  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 16073
  • (◕˽ ◕ ✿)
    • View Profile
Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #71 on: January 03, 2015, 08:56:55 PM »
Tak
I can make a good guess as to what you're doing, but that word can mean either "yes" or "not" (among many other things) in various languages. Can we please keep it simple?
Read the FAQ before asking your question - chances are we already addressed it.
Follow the Flat Earth Society on Twitter and Facebook!

If we are not speculating then we must assume

Saddam Hussein

Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #72 on: January 03, 2015, 09:03:06 PM »
Yes

*

Offline markjo

  • *
  • Posts: 7849
  • Zetetic Council runner-up
    • View Profile
Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #73 on: January 03, 2015, 09:10:49 PM »
Tak
I can make a good guess as to what you're doing, but that word can mean either "yes" or "not" (among many other things) in various languages. Can we please keep it simple?
Better?
Abandon hope all ye who press enter here.

Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge. -- Charles Darwin

If you can't demonstrate it, then you shouldn't believe it.

*

Offline Hoppy

  • *
  • Posts: 1149
  • Posts 6892
    • View Profile
Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #74 on: January 03, 2015, 11:37:54 PM »
yes
God is real.

*

Offline Vongeo

  • *
  • Posts: 634
  • I don't get it either
    • View Profile
Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #75 on: January 04, 2015, 02:12:01 AM »
No because I'm different.


But actually Yes
Maple syrup was a kind of candy, made from the blood of trees.

*

Offline Particle Person

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2987
  • born 2 b b&
    • View Profile
Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #76 on: January 04, 2015, 02:26:11 AM »
Yes
Your mom is when your mom and you arent your mom.

*

Offline Shane

  • *
  • Posts: 2979
  • If you will it, it is no dream
    • View Profile
Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #77 on: January 04, 2015, 04:44:32 AM »
YES
Quote from: Rushy
How do you know you weren't literally given metaphorical wings?

Rama Set

Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #78 on: January 04, 2015, 07:12:23 AM »
Yes

*

Offline jroa

  • *
  • Posts: 3094
  • Kentucky Gentleman
    • View Profile
Re: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Reunification Proposal
« Reply #79 on: January 04, 2015, 12:35:58 PM »
YES