"Freedom of scientific investigation in Antarctica and cooperation toward that end … shall continue"  Meaning if you have a reason, you can freely go there.

Ok you have tagged your own meaning onto the end of that. There are also areas that you can't go because of "preservation interests" ... hhmmm

Take a cup of water, start driving, stay at a constant speed. Does the water fall out

Hahaha it would if I was doing donuts! And we supposedly live on a sphere, not in a cup... so yeah if the water was around the outside of the cup, I'd be soaking!

So does this prove gravity? Or Centripetal Force?

Does it though?



No but that wasn't the point.

You're claiming water would fly out of control in a cup spinning rapidly in circles. Based on this video what are thoughts now? Have you done any experiments to verify your claim?

I haven't so that's why I'm asking.

My thoughts are because of Centripetal Force the water won't fall out of the cup



*

Offline Tom Bishop

  • Zetetic Council Member
  • **
  • Posts: 10668
  • Flat Earth Believer
    • View Profile
Again, this link gives a pretty thorough depiction of the practicality of mounting a mission to Antarctica: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPbhHpeHTiE
« Last Edit: May 22, 2018, 07:07:04 PM by Tom Bishop »


Again, this link gives a pretty thorough depiction of the practicality of mounting a mission to Antarctica: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPbhHpeHTiE

Very informative video Tom cheers

Offline edby

  • *
  • Posts: 1214
    • View Profile
Again, this link gives a pretty thorough depiction of the practicality of mounting a mission to Antarctica: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPbhHpeHTiE

Very informative video Tom cheers
Why not go yourself?

Again, this link gives a pretty thorough depiction of the practicality of mounting a mission to Antarctica: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPbhHpeHTiE
Cliff notes? Sorry, not watching a 30 min video right now, especially if it boils down to "Antarctica is cold and inhospitable, making going here difficult" because, well duh. Again, with the proper funding, and reasons within the bounds of the treaty, you're free to go there. The fact that the former might be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars doesn't change this fact.

Again, this link gives a pretty thorough depiction of the practicality of mounting a mission to Antarctica: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPbhHpeHTiE

Very informative video Tom cheers
Why not go yourself?

Have you watched the video?

Again, this link gives a pretty thorough depiction of the practicality of mounting a mission to Antarctica: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPbhHpeHTiE
Cliff notes? Sorry, not watching a 30 min video right now, especially if it boils down to "Antarctica is cold and inhospitable, making going here difficult" because, well duh. Again, with the proper funding, and reasons within the bounds of the treaty, you're free to go there. The fact that the former might be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars doesn't change this fact.

Its bookmarked at the right point ... you only have to listen for a minute or two

Offline edby

  • *
  • Posts: 1214
    • View Profile
Again, this link gives a pretty thorough depiction of the practicality of mounting a mission to Antarctica: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPbhHpeHTiE
Cliff notes? Sorry, not watching a 30 min video right now, especially if it boils down to "Antarctica is cold and inhospitable, making going here difficult" because, well duh. Again, with the proper funding, and reasons within the bounds of the treaty, you're free to go there. The fact that the former might be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars doesn't change this fact.

Its bookmarked at the right point ... you only have to listen for a minute or two
I listened. So what?

Again, this link gives a pretty thorough depiction of the practicality of mounting a mission to Antarctica: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPbhHpeHTiE
Cliff notes? Sorry, not watching a 30 min video right now, especially if it boils down to "Antarctica is cold and inhospitable, making going here difficult" because, well duh. Again, with the proper funding, and reasons within the bounds of the treaty, you're free to go there. The fact that the former might be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars doesn't change this fact.

Its bookmarked at the right point ... you only have to listen for a minute or two
I listened. So what?

So you can't independently explore Antartica

Again, this link gives a pretty thorough depiction of the practicality of mounting a mission to Antarctica: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPbhHpeHTiE
Cliff notes? Sorry, not watching a 30 min video right now, especially if it boils down to "Antarctica is cold and inhospitable, making going here difficult" because, well duh. Again, with the proper funding, and reasons within the bounds of the treaty, you're free to go there. The fact that the former might be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars doesn't change this fact.

Its bookmarked at the right point ... you only have to listen for a minute or two
The link isn't bookmarked anywhere. I listened to the first 5 minutes and he's already made 2 errors, and has yet to present any evidence. Just sum it up, post an actual link to where he give evidence, or post his 'evidence' yourself please.

Again, this link gives a pretty thorough depiction of the practicality of mounting a mission to Antarctica: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPbhHpeHTiE
Cliff notes? Sorry, not watching a 30 min video right now, especially if it boils down to "Antarctica is cold and inhospitable, making going here difficult" because, well duh. Again, with the proper funding, and reasons within the bounds of the treaty, you're free to go there. The fact that the former might be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars doesn't change this fact.

Its bookmarked at the right point ... you only have to listen for a minute or two
The link isn't bookmarked anywhere. I listened to the first 5 minutes and he's already made 2 errors, and has yet to present any evidence. Just sum it up, post an actual link to where he give evidence, or post his 'evidence' yourself please.



basically from here on out it explains thoroughly how it is made impossible through the pretence of environment protection.

Again, this link gives a pretty thorough depiction of the practicality of mounting a mission to Antarctica: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPbhHpeHTiE
Cliff notes? Sorry, not watching a 30 min video right now, especially if it boils down to "Antarctica is cold and inhospitable, making going here difficult" because, well duh. Again, with the proper funding, and reasons within the bounds of the treaty, you're free to go there. The fact that the former might be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars doesn't change this fact.

Its bookmarked at the right point ... you only have to listen for a minute or two
The link isn't bookmarked anywhere. I listened to the first 5 minutes and he's already made 2 errors, and has yet to present any evidence. Just sum it up, post an actual link to where he give evidence, or post his 'evidence' yourself please.



basically from here on out it explains thoroughly how it is made impossible through the pretence of environment protection.
You basically just linked me to the rest of the video again. He's just making more untrue claims through much of the next few minutes. Guess I'll watch it later, but so far have yet to see anything that either A) I didn't know already or B) Stops this hypothetical expedition from occurring.

Again, this link gives a pretty thorough depiction of the practicality of mounting a mission to Antarctica: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPbhHpeHTiE
Cliff notes? Sorry, not watching a 30 min video right now, especially if it boils down to "Antarctica is cold and inhospitable, making going here difficult" because, well duh. Again, with the proper funding, and reasons within the bounds of the treaty, you're free to go there. The fact that the former might be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars doesn't change this fact.

Its bookmarked at the right point ... you only have to listen for a minute or two
The link isn't bookmarked anywhere. I listened to the first 5 minutes and he's already made 2 errors, and has yet to present any evidence. Just sum it up, post an actual link to where he give evidence, or post his 'evidence' yourself please.



basically from here on out it explains thoroughly how it is made impossible through the pretence of environment protection.
You basically just linked me to the rest of the video again. He's just making more untrue claims through much of the next few minutes. Guess I'll watch it later, but so far have yet to see anything that either A) I didn't know already or B) Stops this hypothetical expedition from occurring.

From what I saw and my point of view it appears that there are claims to allow expedition, but once you go through all the bureaucracy and red tape it would cost you millions at even taking a chance of being permitted ... which given all the restrictions, its cleverly made impossible.

Offline edby

  • *
  • Posts: 1214
    • View Profile
Ok I'm convinced.

Ok I'm convinced.

Can't tell whether that is sarcasm or not  ;D

The fact that there was an Antarctic Treaty signed by 50 countries as soon as Admiral Byrd discovered something in Antarctica, now no-one can do an independent exploration there.

You know you can pay money and go there, right?
https://www.adventureconsultants.com/expeditions/antarctica/south-pole-all-the-way/book-now

You can't perform independent exploration ... you are chauffeured like a child by the government

That's not true. You can do whatever you want, it's just really dangerous.
This guy died living out his dream:
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/11/151109-south-pole-antarctic-explorers-shackleton-expedition/

All you have to do is promise to be ecologically responsible and pay for potential rescue.

Start here, you fill out this form and tell them what you want to do, their job is to make sure you don't kill yourself.
https://antarctic-logistics.com/expedition_planning_questionnaire/