Scientific interpretations about the world are skewed under the dogma of a round earth, and elaborate phenomena and explanations are invented whenever an observation contradicts the status quo.
Why are scientific interpretations regarding round Earth the only interpretations being dragged down by ancient dogma passed on by hundreds of generations? Since the inception of the Scientific Method all dogmas of generations before where/are defeated and/or abandoned as they were/are shown to be wrong. Why is the round Earth dogma the only one which has stood the test of time? What makes it special?
Equating astronomy and astrology? Have you ever heard the phrase "wronger than wrong"?
How long has it actually been that anybody declared that the world was perfectly round? You also seem to forget that gravity is influenced by mass, not shape. You are also, purposely, phrasing your statement incorrectly. The gravity map of Earth shows Earth as not perfectly spherical because it is representative of the varying gravity as measured at various points.
Pilots fly a preplanned path! The sacrilege of such an action! How dare they?! Do you not also travel by foot, bicycle, car or any other method via a preplanned path? Or do you randomly wander around until you finally reach your destination? I'm not entirely sure how this is an argument for FE or against RE. As for shortest distance and according to the FE map there are a number of locations in the United States which would greatly benefit from a shortened flight path directly over the North Pole when flying to Europe. In fact I've made many flights from a location which would have benefitted when going to Europe and I have yet to see the North Pole. I guess the only recourse is to chalk this up to a conspiracy by the airlines to make more money off its passengers.
What point are you even trying to make regarding satellite communications? How does this have anything to do with supporting FE?
So, NASA was created by some shadow organization for some nefarious purpose prior to which point nobody on Earth had any idea of what the Earth looked like but NASA went ahead and projected Earth as a sphere because the people expected to see a sphere. Gotcha.
How is it a coincidence that the U.S. put a satellite in orbit just shortly after Russia? That's what the race was all about. Both countries were working on capability, Russia beat us to the punch. What does this prove? As for the failures of the space program, would you have it that everything about it should have been fully formed, functional and without incident from its inception to now? How many other human endeavors can make the same claim?
Since you guys like to stand so proudly on the shoulders of Rowbotham let's look at one of his failures.
He proposed using Earth's rotation as the prime mover for air travel. His proposal was to launch an airship, keep it stationary via some method and let Earth rotate under it until the desired destination was reached. Needless to say, this was an utter failure.
Now, by the logic you use regarding NASA's failure and that they shouldn't be trusted because of them, the entirety of FET collapses under the weight of Rowbotham's spectacular failure.