The problem is that you are getting your legal analysis from random liberal websites.
I watched a video yesterday where Tucker Carlson was calling Trump's team out on their bullshit.
Tucker Carlson!
So no, not really.
This anonymous internet analysis is likely more credible than whatever you are reading
Yes, I'm sure this quote from some random anonymous person you found which just happens to agree with your viewpoint is more credible than pretty much every news source apart from the real extreme ones which I'd never heard of before all this. Suddenly places like OAN and NewsMax have sprung to prominence. capitalising on the fact that even Fox can't stand by Trump's bollocks any more. Trump's more extreme supporters have scurried off to those places to keep getting their "fix" - networks who will tell them what they want to hear so they don't have to face the reality of the election result.
And while some of what that quote says is accurate, comparisons with 2000 are spurious. That was a genuinely close election where it all came down to 1 state where the difference in vote tallies was in the hundreds. This election was a landslide (by Trump's own logic, Biden's on course for 306 Electoral College votes which Trump got 4 years ago and he called it a landslide). Only Georgia was close enough to trigger a manual recount and when they did the recount they got the same answer.
Trump's only hope is to prove that there was widespread fraud and so far him and his team have come up with nothing credible, nothing that is standing up in court.