Time for you to study mathematics and physics. Math can't prove violation of conservation laws. Only experimentation can, and virtually no experiments have suggested it. Typically, the most ignorant on physics and mathematics also claim to know the most and make sweeping claims. This is the Dunning-Kruger effect.
\section{The war with rude opponents, or Love your enemy, says Jesus}
Opponent on scientific forum:
- Thank you for your research, I laughed at this.
Me:
- Why to laugh? Are we in circus?! No. Thus, I ask for huge amount of respect. Moreover: you are human, I am human. Why am I defected human, but you are not?!
Opponent:
- One does not ask for respect. One earns it. Imho you are not a defect human being. You are just a human being, nothing more, nothing less.
- If I am not defected human, then I am respected one. Correct? German: "Ich bin nicht der Untermensh!" The Presumption of Innocence: everybody is like the God (and, thus, must be treated as like you would treat the God right from beginning), until opposite is proven. Not ``respect must be earned'', but the disrespect ``must be'' earned.
- No. The default position is neutral; neither respect nor disrespect. I would treat no one like a god, no one deserves to be treated like that fictitious evil piece of shit.
- You are not neutral. Being neutral with stranger means to be respectful with 100 percent (otherwise the stranger will sue you). You have said word "shit" in relation to my Religion. It is not being neutral. It is part of WW3 war, and you are on the evil side.
What? No mistakes in General Relativity, because it is tested (like by the project ``Gravity Probe B'')?! Have you heard of Nihilism? The Nihilism is philosophy of deliberate lie. For example, a nihilist knows, that $2+2=4$, but says: $2+2=7$. Some one of Conspiracy Theories is right. The atheism is expression of Nihilism. Hasn't it Mister Donald Trump explained what ``fake news" are? Therefore, even reading a Physical Review paper, use your own brain.
Opponent: ``Looks like some failed scientist are trying to misuse ResearchGate to spread their weird ideas.''. I would fail only, if I will arrive at hell. Russians never surrender (``Fight like you've never fought before -- First Knight'' YouTube).
Without extensive support of Flat Earth Community (I would turn for support to the Creation Science Society and the UFO--Alien Research Society with my Light Force as well, I would never stop) I can not make the paper fairly peer-reviewed. Without such review it fails the Scientific Method.
Opponent: ``So basically what you are trying to say is it’s all just pie in the sky wishful thinking, or nonesense, take your pick.''
It is if you prefer negativism. I prefer positivism, thus I am saying: it is output of my brain, and my conscience is in piece with it. I think, that on this dirty world the results will not be (fairly) peer-reviewed. But I hope for the investigation in afterlife.
Do not call names (like ``idiot'') your brother -- me. All humans are blood relatives (look up in Wikipedia: Mitochondrial Eve and Adam.) So, by destroying me, you are destroying yourself. Self-destruction is sin.
Do not be rude. I am a respectful one with papers in Physical Review E, European Journal of Physics B, etc. Opponent: ``Your last regular paper is from 2006, the others are from 2001-2003. Everything after that is going more and more into the direction of complete nonsense. I'm not rude, whatever reputation you once had, you destroyed it by yourself.'' Because in General Relativity the Universe is 4 dimensional, one can not destroy anything inside the Universe. My top academic activity (the glorious activity!) is in the 2006, 2001-2003 (``Frank Sinatra -- New York, New York'' YouTube).