61
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: February 12, 2024, 10:54:35 PM »ITT^LD claims revisionist history and opinion articles count more than actual live events.Technically the primary wasn't rigged, the DNC promoted one candidate over others.ITT^LD asking why rigged elections are bad and querying why the DNC would want to make sure a lifelong Democrat (aka TRUMP) would win.I'm more interested in why thats something you think is bad?FTFYOh no, they publicly displayed the DNC's very weird emails where you learned that the DNC was corrupt! Good thing you made sure to just get mad at Russia about it instead of trying to fix any corruption.That's completely irrelevant and you know it. Putin did not target the DNC and release their emails out of a sense of altruism or opposition to corruption. He did it to pursue his own political agenda, one that happens to be deeply hostile to America and its interests. That's election interference. The fact that you personally don't care about it and don't think it should be a crime (something that you have in common with Trump) doesn't change the fact that it is a crime and it is something that this nation takes very seriously.Never mind the fact that if the DNC did not rig the primary tto begin with, there would have been nothing to disclose. "PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN!"
By rigging it for Clinton, Trump was able to win.
The DNC intentionally made sure Trump would win!
Kinda like how the RNC kept Trump from being primaries in 2020.
Oh, so your history is that the democrats rigged the 2016 election so Trump would win?