[ElTrancy]

There is lots of footage on YouTube to demonstrate the fakery. The way the astronauts bounce as if they are on wires for one. The pathetic lunar landing module that looks like it was wrapped in tin foil. And how is it that they can get a little tv camera to broadcast images, from the moon, in 1969, uninterrupted, back to earth? Yet today, in 2018 if it gets a bit cloudy outside my Sky TV loses its satellite signal? No, primitive 60's technology couldn't achieve that. However, if you could prove it happened, it wouldn't disprove flat earth, just prove NASA went to the moon. They planted a flag, yes? Why was it blowing? Why can people not look through a powerful telescope and see a flag? There isn't one. Please provide proof of the flag that's allegedly there and silence us all.

That's because the Flag was fake, and the MOON IS HUGE YOU FLATTARD. Also, your Sky TV goes out, because it's slightly retarded, just like you

[Spycrab]

There is lots of footage on YouTube to demonstrate the fakery. The way the astronauts bounce as if they are on wires for one. The pathetic lunar landing module that looks like it was wrapped in tin foil. And how is it that they can get a little tv camera to broadcast images, from the moon, in 1969, uninterrupted, back to earth? Yet today, in 2018 if it gets a bit cloudy outside my Sky TV loses its satellite signal? No, primitive 60's technology couldn't achieve that. However, if you could prove it happened, it wouldn't disprove flat earth, just prove NASA went to the moon. They planted a flag, yes? Why was it blowing? Why can people not look through a powerful telescope and see a flag? There isn't one. Please provide proof of the flag that's allegedly there and silence us all.

That's because the Flag was fake, and the MOON IS HUGE YOU FLATTARD. Also, your Sky TV goes out, because it's slightly retarded, just like you

Don't type in all caps. It's not classy.
In other news, the flag did not flutter in the wind, it was a glitch in the telescopic arm they put in to keep it straight.
https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=97589&page=1
Also, again, the Sky TV is not a good analogy. NASA was using colossal dishes that could recieve signals through the clouds
A brief google image search will give you a good idea of what they look like.
By the way, if the moon were that huge, wouldn't it drown us all with tides, or be immediately ripped to pieces by earth's superior gravity?
I actually started a similar discussion in another thread, if you want to tell me how wrong I am.
https://forum.tfes.org/index.php?topic=9303.0

[ElTrancy]

There is lots of footage on YouTube to demonstrate the fakery. The way the astronauts bounce as if they are on wires for one. The pathetic lunar landing module that looks like it was wrapped in tin foil. And how is it that they can get a little tv camera to broadcast images, from the moon, in 1969, uninterrupted, back to earth? Yet today, in 2018 if it gets a bit cloudy outside my Sky TV loses its satellite signal? No, primitive 60's technology couldn't achieve that. However, if you could prove it happened, it wouldn't disprove flat earth, just prove NASA went to the moon. They planted a flag, yes? Why was it blowing? Why can people not look through a powerful telescope and see a flag? There isn't one. Please provide proof of the flag that's allegedly there and silence us all.

That's because the Flag was fake, and the MOON IS HUGE YOU FLATTARD. Also, your Sky TV goes out, because it's slightly retarded, just like you

Don't type in all caps. It's not classy.
In other news, the flag did not flutter in the wind, it was a glitch in the telescopic arm they put in to keep it straight.
https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=97589&page=1
Also, again, the Sky TV is not a good analogy. NASA was using colossal dishes that could recieve signals through the clouds
A brief google image search will give you a good idea of what they look like.
By the way, if the moon were that huge, wouldn't it drown us all with tides, or be immediately ripped to pieces by earth's superior gravity?
I actually started a similar discussion in another thread, if you want to tell me how wrong I am.
https://forum.tfes.org/index.php?topic=9303.0

Spycrab, I was referring to the moon as huge, as it is very large compared to a human. It's like saying, "But if there are people on Earth, why can't I seem them from space?!"

[Spycrab]

Ah, sorry. Carry on.

[ElTrancy]

My profile picture is basically what they call the "Ice Wall" to me, I can never think of anything other than the Wall from GOT 

[Parallax]

There is lots of footage on YouTube to demonstrate the fakery. The way the astronauts bounce as if they are on wires for one. The pathetic lunar landing module that looks like it was wrapped in tin foil. And how is it that they can get a little tv camera to broadcast images, from the moon, in 1969, uninterrupted, back to earth? Yet today, in 2018 if it gets a bit cloudy outside my Sky TV loses its satellite signal? No, primitive 60's technology couldn't achieve that. However, if you could prove it happened, it wouldn't disprove flat earth, just prove NASA went to the moon. They planted a flag, yes? Why was it blowing? Why can people not look through a powerful telescope and see a flag? There isn't one. Please provide proof of the flag that's allegedly there and silence us all.

That's because the Flag was fake, and the MOON IS HUGE YOU FLATTARD. Also, your Sky TV goes out, because it's slightly retarded, just like you

The flag was fake? Not what I expected to hear from a round earth heretic.

[AATW]

I'm not sure what "the flag was fake" actually means.
Although, if it helps, the flat had a rigid pole along the top, otherwise in the vacuum on the moon it would have just hung limply which would have not been very impressive in photos.
It flaps as they're screwing it into the surface.

If you want to learn more about it all then read "Man on the Moon" by Andrew Chaikin.

[ElTrancy]

There is lots of footage on YouTube to demonstrate the fakery. The way the astronauts bounce as if they are on wires for one. The pathetic lunar landing module that looks like it was wrapped in tin foil. And how is it that they can get a little tv camera to broadcast images, from the moon, in 1969, uninterrupted, back to earth? Yet today, in 2018 if it gets a bit cloudy outside my Sky TV loses its satellite signal? No, primitive 60's technology couldn't achieve that. However, if you could prove it happened, it wouldn't disprove flat earth, just prove NASA went to the moon. They planted a flag, yes? Why was it blowing? Why can people not look through a powerful telescope and see a flag? There isn't one. Please provide proof of the flag that's allegedly there and silence us all.

That's because the Flag was fake, and the MOON IS HUGE YOU FLATTARD. Also, your Sky TV goes out, because it's slightly retarded, just like you

The flag was fake? Not what I expected to hear from a round earth heretic.

First of all, you guys are the heretics, ya might wanna look up the definition of the word "heretic" I was referring to the flag isn't a conventional flag, it was a fake flag, to make it seem like it was waving straight, but that would be impossible. I didn't mean they faked putting a flag there, I just meant the flag wasn't a normal flag.

[Parallax]

There is lots of footage on YouTube to demonstrate the fakery. The way the astronauts bounce as if they are on wires for one. The pathetic lunar landing module that looks like it was wrapped in tin foil. And how is it that they can get a little tv camera to broadcast images, from the moon, in 1969, uninterrupted, back to earth? Yet today, in 2018 if it gets a bit cloudy outside my Sky TV loses its satellite signal? No, primitive 60's technology couldn't achieve that. However, if you could prove it happened, it wouldn't disprove flat earth, just prove NASA went to the moon. They planted a flag, yes? Why was it blowing? Why can people not look through a powerful telescope and see a flag? There isn't one. Please provide proof of the flag that's allegedly there and silence us all.

That's because the Flag was fake, and the MOON IS HUGE YOU FLATTARD. Also, your Sky TV goes out, because it's slightly retarded, just like you

The flag was fake? Not what I expected to hear from a round earth heretic.

First of all, you guys are the heretics, ya might wanna look up the definition of the word "heretic" I was referring to the flag isn't a conventional flag, it was a fake flag, to make it seem like it was waving straight, but that would be impossible. I didn't mean they faked putting a flag there, I just meant the flag wasn't a normal flag.

Cool story bro.

[nickrulercreator]

Wait you claim the flag is fake now?

Wtf

[Tontogary]

There is lots of footage on YouTube to demonstrate the fakery. The way the astronauts bounce as if they are on wires for one. The pathetic lunar landing module that looks like it was wrapped in tin foil. And how is it that they can get a little tv camera to broadcast images, from the moon, in 1969, uninterrupted, back to earth? Yet today, in 2018 if it gets a bit cloudy outside my Sky TV loses its satellite signal? No, primitive 60's technology couldn't achieve that. However, if you could prove it happened, it wouldn't disprove flat earth, just prove NASA went to the moon. They planted a flag, yes? Why was it blowing? Why can people not look through a powerful telescope and see a flag? There isn't one. Please provide proof of the flag that's allegedly there and silence us all.

And how do satellite tvs work? I thought satellites were another misconception/conspiracy theory. If the weather is bad between your dish and the satellite, it must prove satellites are real.
Also even someone who is as blinkered as you must admit there is not that much rain or heavy clouds between the earth and the motion to obscure a signal, plus the receiving ground stations are somewhat bigger than your teeny little sky dish.

[Westprog]

And how do satellite tvs work? I thought satellites were another misconception/conspiracy theory. If the weather is bad between your dish and the satellite, it must prove satellites are real.
Also even someone who is as blinkered as you must admit there is not that much rain or heavy clouds between the earth and the motion to obscure a signal, plus the receiving ground stations are somewhat bigger than your teeny little sky dish.

I have to admit, using satellite TV as proof of a flat Earth shows commendable nerve. What the flat Earth theory is about satellites I can't begin to imagine.

[Tontogary]

And how do satellite tvs work? I thought satellites were another misconception/conspiracy theory. If the weather is bad between your dish and the satellite, it must prove satellites are real.
Also even someone who is as blinkered as you must admit there is not that much rain or heavy clouds between the earth and the motion to obscure a signal, plus the receiving ground stations are somewhat bigger than your teeny little sky dish.

I have to admit, using satellite TV as proof of a flat Earth shows commendable nerve. What the flat Earth theory is about satellites I can't begin to imagine.

Apparently they are all lies, and a conspiracy. In another thread it was claimed that the sat tv boxes are doctored to make us believe they are using a satellite!

[Westprog]

And how do satellite tvs work? I thought satellites were another misconception/conspiracy theory. If the weather is bad between your dish and the satellite, it must prove satellites are real.
Also even someone who is as blinkered as you must admit there is not that much rain or heavy clouds between the earth and the motion to obscure a signal, plus the receiving ground stations are somewhat bigger than your teeny little sky dish.

I have to admit, using satellite TV as proof of a flat Earth shows commendable nerve. What the flat Earth theory is about satellites I can't begin to imagine.

Apparently they are all lies, and a conspiracy. In another thread it was claimed that the sat tv boxes are doctored to make us believe they are using a satellite!

That's quite funny. It's of course very easy to verify that your satellite dish only works when it's pointed up into the sky - in fact, to a very particular spot in the sky. There are little gadgets that measure the signal. Just how this is compatible with FE theory is a puzzle, but it's a puzzle in psychology, not physics.

[ElTrancy]

Wait you claim the flag is fake now?

Wtf

I literally just explained it.

[nickrulercreator]

Wait you claim the flag is fake now?

Wtf

I literally just explained it.

Not really. You said it wasn't a normal flag. What do you mean by this? How can a flag not be normal?

[AATW]

FFS! It pretty much was a regular flag. The only difference is it was fixed to a rod along the top so it stayed upright rather than hanging limp as it would have done otherwise because of the lack of atmosphere.

[Macarios]

Here is the description:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Flag_Assembly

[nickrulercreator]

Oh I understand now. I thought you meant the flag was literally fake, and not a flag. Sorry for the confusion.

[Rama Set]

Proving the moon landing won't prove flat earth, it will just prove the moon landing. The only thing that will prove round earth is an actual, non cgi shot of the planet. But they can't give us that.

The Himiwari-8 satellite provides complete images of the Earth every 10 minutes.