*

Offline Snupes

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1957
  • Counting wolves in your paranoiac intervals
    • View Profile
Re: Gramey hopes
« Reply #20 on: February 10, 2014, 01:06:14 AM »
Because it's really popular

That and the fact that they think it makes some kind of statement. It's nothing special, but it's nice to have something like that on the radio I guess.

Besides, "Biting Down" is clearly the much superior Lorde song. That or "The Love Club".
There are cigarettes in joints. You don't smoke it by itself.

*

Offline Particle Person

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2987
  • born 2 b b&
    • View Profile
Re: Gramey hopes
« Reply #21 on: February 10, 2014, 02:18:49 AM »
Disliking a well known pop song... now that's bravery.
Your mom is when your mom and you arent your mom.

Rama Set

Re: Gramey hopes
« Reply #22 on: February 10, 2014, 01:20:12 PM »
Royals is a fairly unique pop song for which I give kudos. As for an "awful" melody, I am not sure what that means other than "Saddam doesn't like it" which is fairly irrelevant. The Grammy's are only really concerned with popular music, so within that field I feel they chose a deserving winner; it's definitely got more substance than the average Rihanna or Katy Perry fare or the faux-fringe of Lady Gaga.

Saddam Hussein

Re: Gramey hopes
« Reply #23 on: February 10, 2014, 03:32:33 PM »
Royals is a fairly unique pop song for which I give kudos. As for an "awful" melody, I am not sure what that means other than "Saddam doesn't like it" which is fairly irrelevant. The Grammy's are only really concerned with popular music, so within that field I feel they chose a deserving winner; it's definitely got more substance than the average Rihanna or Katy Perry fare or the faux-fringe of Lady Gaga.

You buttmad, bro?

Rama Set

Re: Gramey hopes
« Reply #24 on: February 10, 2014, 03:34:25 PM »
Royals is a fairly unique pop song for which I give kudos. As for an "awful" melody, I am not sure what that means other than "Saddam doesn't like it" which is fairly irrelevant. The Grammy's are only really concerned with popular music, so within that field I feel they chose a deserving winner; it's definitely got more substance than the average Rihanna or Katy Perry fare or the faux-fringe of Lady Gaga.

You buttmad, bro?

Not in to people disagreeing with you... bro?

Saddam Hussein

Re: Gramey hopes
« Reply #25 on: February 10, 2014, 03:35:09 PM »
I was hoping to get a reaction. :(

Rama Set

Re: Gramey hopes
« Reply #26 on: February 10, 2014, 03:36:40 PM »
Mission accomplished!

Saddam Hussein

Re: Gramey hopes
« Reply #27 on: April 04, 2014, 02:56:32 AM »

Offline Blanko

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2471
    • View Profile
Re: Gramey hopes
« Reply #28 on: April 04, 2014, 04:30:40 AM »
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/27/macklemores_useless_apology_grammys_and_the_myth_of_meritocracy/

I think Kendrick Lamar was better therefore RACIST!

Why would Kendrick Lamar be labeled as a new artist anyway?

*

Offline Snupes

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1957
  • Counting wolves in your paranoiac intervals
    • View Profile
Re: Gramey hopes
« Reply #29 on: April 04, 2014, 06:40:38 AM »
Why would Macklemore and Ryan Lewis?
There are cigarettes in joints. You don't smoke it by itself.