1
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Why hasn't Earth broken apart so far?
« on: June 05, 2021, 05:10:33 PM »I don’t see how the standard dictionary definition can be considered “ambiguous”Conveniently, I already provided you with the source of the ambiguity. I can't force you to see it, let alone to read it, but it's easily available to you should you choose to address it.it is misleading to say they are incompatible.That continues to be something you misread/misunderstood because you didn't bother to read on. I already asked you to move on, so now I'm warning you instead. If you can't stay focused enough to finish reading the article, or if you lack the common sense to simply ask questions about things you don't understand, then you're gonna have to take your posting to AR.There is nothing else in the article that suggests there is any sense in which the two theories are compatible.This statement is false, and after the amount of wilfully obtuse behaviour from you above, I am convinced that this is completely deliberate. One way or another, this ends now.
I’m not being deliberately obtuse. I’m trying to figure out where in FET there is room for traditional theories of gravitation.
The wiki says they are incompatible because they require a spherical earth. That doesn’t seem to leave a lot of room.