Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
https://twitter.com/ThatGuyM77/status/1763294353496137999
How was I supporting it in that post? I was neither supporting nor condemning it. I was just stating as a fact that society is still trying to figure out the trans issue and what to do with it
...
I stand by my quote - I mean, it isn't even an opinion. It's just a fact that migration has been a good thing
...
Again, that's not an opinion it's just biology. I didn't express an opinion on abortion in that post, I was responding to the assertion that a clump of cells in the very early stages of development is a "human life who wants to live". It doesn't have a brain, how can it "want" anything?
It interesting how much that lot care about unborn babies.
And how little they care about actual babies, children or adults who are vulnerable.
Oh yes, lets trust the people who deported her to tell the truth. I'm sure they have aboslutely no reason to lie. Nope. That's why they skipped the formalities of a judicial hearing and jumped right into it.
Seriously Tom... believing the official story? Really? Gonna go support NASA's moon mission now?
Her son is a US citizen. And while she would probably be deported, her son would not. What happens to the kid is decided in a court with the parents having several options.https://www.npr.org/2025/04/26/nx-s1-5378077/honduras-deported-girl-citizen
First they came for the illegals.
Then they came for the citizens who were children.
This is why we have courts: Because ICE isn't someone you can trust to give you a truthful answer. That kid could have stayed with their dad/partner. That's typically how it works. Or another family member. The fact that ICE is saying this is what she wanted is not something anyone can verify. Which, again, is why we have fucking courts!
She didn't visit a court to enter the country, why should she bother visiting just before getting kicked out of it?
https://twitter.com/EricLDaugh/status/1916840519222669573
This is an oddly ironic form of projection. You are on Team WokeNo, I'm not. I'll add this to the very long list of "things Tom is wrong about".
You really need to stop telling people what they believe.Quotewhich is trying to convince normal people that that men can be women, that abortion is just fine, that mass migration is beneficialI don't believe any of those things. They are all complex issues which people like you try to pretend are simple ones.
Where we are as a society right now different sexualities are accepted - so you don't "do" anything about that. With trans stuff we as a society are still on a journey.
Immigration has been a good thing for us economically and in terms of filling skills gaps. Old people don't like it because of "all them foreigners coming over here"
A clump of cells doesn’t “want” anything and by no sensible definition would you declare it a human life.
Quoteand yet you think that the other side is a cult.If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck...
The way you slavishly defend everything your Supreme Leader does, no matter how clearly wrong.
The way you do mental backflips to believe the obvious lies.
Those are the actions of a cult member.
Grown ups consider statements and actions on their merit. Your first reaction is not "what was said?" or "what was done?" but "who said/did it?".
The answer to that last question then forms your opinion. If it's your Supreme Leader or one of his minions then your reaction is thisisfine.jpg, no matter how blatant the lie or how egregious the action.
Those are the actions of a cult member.
While we're on the subject of criticizing avatars, I was deeply hurt to discover that Tom's avatar was not, in fact, a picture of himself, but of a dentist whose name is not Tom Bishop. We trusted you, and you let us down.
This is an interesting choice of a comeback, considering that you have an avatar of an internet troll.That isn't even true. Can you literally not get anything right? It's just a posh gentleman meme.
https://meme.fandom.com/wiki/Feel_Like_a_Sir
Your response is basically "no u", and you've not even got that right. Dear me.
It's not irrational. With Johnson it's strategic, with Trump I'm not sure he even knows what the truth is.
It's hilarious that you continue to pretend you're winning arguments - you generally walk away from a thread when you've been humiliated declaring yourself the winner.
Your constant thisisfine.jpg meme is fooling no-one. It's a bit embarrassing watching you flail around trying to justify the unjustifiable.
People would have some respect for you on here if you admitted when your cult leader makes a mistake.
The mental backflips you keep doing to pretend he's infallible make you look ridiculous.
Yes yes, your side "won" - I just wonder how bad things have to get in the US before you stop to consider than it was a pyrrhic victory.
I'm not responsible for any dumb or incorrect thing some guy on Twitter said, and I don't need to defend him or otherwise answer for him. You keep trying to push this weird idea that everyone who criticizes Trump is on the same "team," and shares the responsibility whenever one of them makes a mistake.
Yes, it's actually a good thing that an unqualified drunk is in charge of the military and regularly shares classified information on unsecured platforms with people who have no security clearance.
Assessing Claims That Pete Hegseth Was Drinking at a Press Conference
Viral images appear to show a brown liquid but higher-definition videos indicate his beverage was clear.
Pete Hegseth accused of chanting ‘kill all Muslims’ on a drunken night out
Besides Hegseth drunkenly yelling the hateful Islamophobic chant, a whistelblower report alleged that he had to be stopped from storming a dancers’ stage at a Louisiana strip club.
The problem here is the poor quality of arguments.The actual problem is that you are either a troll or, less likely but certainly possible, you’re so deep in the Trump cult that you have managed to convince yourself you see 5 fingers when only 4 are held up.
But even if you have convinced yourself, you don’t convince anyone else.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/20/politics/hegseth-second-signal-chat-military-plans/index.html
Whiskeyleaks strikes again!
I think we just gotta ask ourselves... If a president will lie about something as trivial as his weight and height... What else is he gonna lie about? How can we trust him?You’re right.
But the issue is Trump lies endlessly. One side know this and are bemused that he has ended up in power anyway. The other side just don’t care about his endless lies or have somehow deluded themselves in to believing he doesn’t lie. From the other side of the pond it is all a bit baffling. But we had similar with Johnson over here.
My "favourite" (if that's the right word) Boris example was when he went to a hospital for a photo-op and was accosted by a parent of a patient there. The man lambasted Boris about the lack of resources and for coming to the hospital for a photo-op. Boris denied it and said something along the lines of "there are no press here" in front of the press who were recording the encounter.
Your "favourite" example is actually an embarrassing display of your tendency to assume things which suit you without considering that you might be wrong and that you need to research your positions. Obviously "there are no press here" can mean a lot of things. Namely that they weren't acting as press. It's not too hard to find that this was the case:
https://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/factcheck-qa-what-did-boris-johnson-mean-when-he-said-there-were-no-press-at-his-hospital-visitOmar Salem was waiting for his daughter to be treated in a paediatric ward in Whipps Cross hospital in northeast London when he confronted the Prime Minister, saying: “The NHS is being destroyed… it’s being destroyed and now you come here for a press opportunity.”
Mr Johnson replied: “Well actually, there’s no press here.”
Gesticulating at the members of the media standing nearby, Mr Salem said: “What do you mean, there’s no press here? Who are these people?”
Mr Johnson appeared to start an attempted explanation, saying: “They’re… they’re here…” before trailing off.
Who was at the event?
Downing Street invited a photographer and a video crew from the Press Association – the UK’s news agency of record – to the event, as well as a “pool” video crew, consisting of a camera operator and broadcast journalist.
The long-established pool system involves the major broadcasters (including ITN, the makers of Channel 4 News) taking it in turns to send cameras and journalists to events that we know about in advance.
Footage shot by the pool camera crew is then made available to other members of the pool for use in their own broadcasts.
Often, the pool team agrees to go to the event on the understanding that a reporter will get the chance to ask questions of politicians like Boris Johnson.
Obviously, if only one reporter attends, that limits the scope of the questions, but the questions aren’t pre-arranged with the government and there’s no restriction on what journalists can ask.
On this occasion, the broadcasters who run the pool were told that they would be able to film Mr Johnson walking around the hospital visit, but no arrangements were made to record an interview the Prime Minister, or ask him questions.
The pool team agreed to go on this understanding. Apart from the Press Association, it appears that no other reporters from newspapers or other news organisations attended.
This may have been what Mr Johnson had in mind when he said there were “no press” at the event.
Trump is supposed to be 6'3", yet is shorter than Vance who is 6'2".
You are not a mod here so you don't get to tell me what to post or what not to.
The video is relevant to this thread. And of course I looked at it. To say I haven't is an incorrect accusation and ironic from someone who often posts cherry picked quotes from articles which actually say the exact opposite of what the cherry picked quote implies.
An interesting and somewhat baffling response given that this exchange started with a video which juxtaposes one of the lies with the proof that it's a lie. Of course you see not just evidence of it but absolute proof of it. Your response is interesting. You have a cult leader who you believe to be infallible and truthful. You see a video which clearly demonstrates he lies. What do you do with that contradiction? An honest response would be to change your views on the fallibility and honesty of the cult leader. It is interesting that your response is to try and reconcile the lie with the proof that it's a lie by pretending that words don't mean what you know they mean.
