Random Questions
« on: March 03, 2017, 11:43:30 PM »
Do FE believe in atmospheric pressure?

*

Offline juner

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10175
    • View Profile
Re: Random Questions
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2017, 03:58:11 AM »
Do FE believe in atmospheric pressure?

Yes.

*

Offline Roundy

  • Abdicator of the Zetetic Council
  • *
  • Posts: 4183
    • View Profile
Re: Random Questions
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2017, 02:42:55 PM »
Usually an unapostrophed "s" at the end of a noun implies that there's going to be more than one of something.
Dr. Frank is a physicist. He says it's impossible. So it's impossible.
My friends, please remember Tom said this the next time you fall into the trap of engaging him, and thank you. :)

geckothegeek

Re: Random Questions
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2017, 04:14:11 AM »
Do FE believe in atmospheric pressure?

Yes.

But wouldn't it be "atmoplanic pressure" on a flat earth ?

*

Offline juner

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10175
    • View Profile
Re: Random Questions
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2017, 04:54:35 AM »
Do FE believe in atmospheric pressure?

Yes.

But wouldn't it be "atmoplanic pressure" on a flat earth ?

Not necessarily.

geckothegeek

Re: Random Questions
« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2017, 04:01:59 PM »
Do FE believe in atmospheric pressure?

Yes.

But wouldn't it be "atmoplanic pressure" on a flat earth ?

Not necessarily.

But it wouldn't be "atmospheric" on a flat earth ?

geckothegeek

Re: Random Questions
« Reply #6 on: March 05, 2017, 04:48:32 PM »
Do FE believe in atmospheric pressure?

You can believe any thing you can imagine, make up, or think of if you're a flat earther. LOL

Re: Random Questions
« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2017, 04:12:10 PM »
FE proponents demand some of the highest burdens of proof on any scientific theory or principle.

The fact that the FE exists is testament to the fact that the science is inconclusive.

FE proponents will give anything a chance that can possible be experimented on, observed and documented in a proper scientific way. Atmospheric pressure is probably one of those things.

Re: Random Questions
« Reply #8 on: March 06, 2017, 11:54:41 PM »
FE proponents demand some of the highest burdens of proof on any scientific theory or principle.

Lol. TTIOH, you are rapidly becoming my favorite flat earther. This is gold.

Re: Random Questions
« Reply #9 on: March 07, 2017, 08:55:58 AM »
FE proponents demand some of the highest burdens of proof on any scientific theory or principle.

Lol. TTIOH, you are rapidly becoming my favorite flat earther. This is gold.
He's not a flat earther, he's undecided. It's not easy being a creationist in that regard. :)
Ignored by Intikam since 2016.

*

Offline Rounder

  • *
  • Posts: 780
  • What in the Sam Hill are you people talking about?
    • View Profile
Re: Random Questions
« Reply #10 on: March 08, 2017, 05:18:26 AM »
Lol. TTIOH, you are rapidly becoming my favorite flat earther. This is gold.
He's not a flat earther, he's undecided. It's not easy being a creationist in that regard. :)
Is he, though?  Is he undecided?  That's easy to SAY, but on matters relevant to the shape of the earth I don't believe I have ever seen him question or challenge a FE post, nor have I seen him agree with an RE post.  If I'm wrong about that, I would love to be reminded of when either of those happened.
Proud member of İntikam's "Ignore List"
Ok. You proven you are unworthy to unignored. You proven it was a bad idea to unignore you. and it was for me a disgusting experience...Now you are going to place where you deserved and accustomed.
Quote from: SexWarrior
You accuse {FE} people of malice where incompetence suffice

Re: Random Questions
« Reply #11 on: March 08, 2017, 08:00:44 AM »
Lol. TTIOH, you are rapidly becoming my favorite flat earther. This is gold.
He's not a flat earther, he's undecided. It's not easy being a creationist in that regard. :)
Is he, though?  Is he undecided?  That's easy to SAY, but on matters relevant to the shape of the earth I don't believe I have ever seen him question or challenge a FE post, nor have I seen him agree with an RE post.  If I'm wrong about that, I would love to be reminded of when either of those happened.
I concur, I'm merely loosely citing his own words.
Ignored by Intikam since 2016.