[Thork]

So you're choosing third party information over things you can see with your own eyes.  This is exactly why the Flat Earth Society exists, to refute this kind of thinking. 

This type of behavior is prevaleny among FEers as well.

For example, FEer claim that the unvarying size of the disc of the Sun in the sky is just an optical illusion. EnaG claims that it's just the projection of the Sun unto the atmosphere, which is so laughable modern FEers don't mention that original claim.

Do Round Earther's still claim the earth is a few hundred million years old?
http://www.livescience.com/32326-how-old-is-earth.html

Our theories are every bit as dynamic, only based on true zetetic observation.

[Gulliver]

Our theories are every bit as dynamic, only based on true zetetic observation.

Please provide evidence for your outlandish claim. Also clearly define dynamic. the Zetetic process develops theories that cannot be contradicted. See:

"Zetetic" process, the conclusion arrived at is essentially a quotient; which, if the details are correctly worked, must of necessity be true, and beyond the reach or power of contradiction.

[markjo]

Our theories are every bit as dynamic, only based on true zetetic observation.

What "true zetetic observations" were used to develop Universal Accleration and Electromagnetic Acceleration and how do those observations place those theories "beyond the reach or power of contradiction"?

[Thork]

The only issue is defining what is truly a zetetic approach. If the approach is in some way tainted, not truly zetetic, errors are made. At FES we are constantly finding new ways to improve on our scientific observations. And this makes our model stronger and more irrefutable than before.

[Gulliver]

The only issue is defining what is truly a zetetic approach. If the approach is in some way tainted, not truly zetetic, errors are made. At FES we are constantly finding new ways to improve on our scientific observations. And this makes our model stronger and more irrefutable than before.

So you admit at least that you're trying to make your theories less dynamic.

[Thork]

The only issue is defining what is truly a zetetic approach. If the approach is in some way tainted, not truly zetetic, errors are made. At FES we are constantly finding new ways to improve on our scientific observations. And this makes our model stronger and more irrefutable than before.

So you admit at least that you're trying to make your theories less dynamic.

We are trying to find out the truth. 

[Gulliver]

The only issue is defining what is truly a zetetic approach. If the approach is in some way tainted, not truly zetetic, errors are made. At FES we are constantly finding new ways to improve on our scientific observations. And this makes our model stronger and more irrefutable than before.

So you admit at least that you're trying to make your theories less dynamic.

We are trying to find out the truth. 

Would you provide a detail example of recent improvements in your scientific observations, please? Please include the date, time, variables, and observed values of the improved scientific observation. Thanks!

[fappenhosen]

Our theories are every bit as dynamic, only based on true zetetic observation.

What "true zetetic observations" were used to develop Universal Accleration and Electromagnetic Acceleration and how do those observations place those theories "beyond the reach or power of contradiction"?

Those theories were discredited a long time ago. The only observations you need to make are looking into a Bible.

[Everything is Satans Hoax]

What about the british arctic survey who measured the coast of Antartica and it was  45,317km.

That is more than the circumference of your round Earth, is it not?  Maybe the rest of the stuff you have been spoon fed is bullshit too?

It is actually 17k kilometers, I think he was getting mixed up. Anyways, according to the FE model, Antarctica is 123k km, which is waaayyyyy off. Is this 17k km measurement a hoax by the government? hmmmm..... Also, If you are traveling by to the ice wall, please send me some proof it is 123k km. Also, if there were infinite ice, then why would people not take from it and use it to stop world thirst? Surely infinite ice is enough. Or it could be a ploy that ice melts into water.........

[Rounder]

This thread was last active and a half YEARS ago.  Couldn’t you find anything recent to comment on?