Offline yash.paz123

  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Round Earth Scientist
    • View Profile
Re: Gravity (2.0)
« Reply #20 on: June 28, 2017, 02:39:11 AM »
If the moon and the stars all have a gravitational pull, then why doesn't the "flat-earth"?
F = m*a.
F = m*v^2/r.
F = -G*m1*m2/r^2.

*

Offline Boots

  • *
  • Posts: 795
  • ---- Cogito, ergo sum. ---- -Descartes
    • View Profile
Re: Gravity (2.0)
« Reply #21 on: June 28, 2017, 02:41:41 AM »
What is the meaning of 'Check you messages'?
Click
“There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them.” - George Orwell

*

Offline juner

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10178
    • View Profile
Re: Gravity (2.0)
« Reply #22 on: June 28, 2017, 03:20:56 AM »
Is anyone going to respond

Hi there, I would suggest you stop making double and triple posts. If people want to reply, they will. Spamming the FE fora is considered low-content posting and is against the rules. I would also suggest you take a look at the wiki and FAQ, as it is clear you are lacking in the fundamentals of FET. It will answer some of your questions, whether or not you like the answer is another story. You will find that if you ask the very basics of FE, members here will simply direct you to the wiki as they have answered those questions hundreds of times.

If you have a specific question, feel free to ask it. In the mean time, I would suggest reviewing the Equivalence Principle, acceleration using Special Relativity, as well as coordinate acceleration vs. proper acceleration.
« Last Edit: June 28, 2017, 06:39:00 PM by junker »

Offline yash.paz123

  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Round Earth Scientist
    • View Profile
Re: Gravity (2.0)
« Reply #23 on: June 28, 2017, 04:56:09 PM »
None of these phenomena can exist or be true on a flat world:

Missing Gravitational Time Dilation on a non-rotating plain. It would mean that time would flow at the same rate on a flat earth that it does near a great big pyramid or a plain ground.

Varying Acceleration for all falling objects. It would mean cutting the world into pieces that accelerated at different rates.

Accelerating upwards at 9.8m/s^2. It would mean that all the star systems and constellations would be traveling downwards in the earths perspective, which is not true.

Universal Acceleration has not yet been remotely proven or provided any amount of backing evidence to support the theory.

The Moon orbits the earth, and if the earth were flat and were not a source of gravity, then the moon would shoot away from the earth due to excess centrifugal forces. Also, the earth would crash into the moon due to the upward velocity.

How do you explain time differences between two regions of the earth.

The Burj Khalifa Building in Dubai allows you to see two sunsets in one day if you see one sunset at sea level and take the super-fast elevator to the top of the building to witness a second sunset. This would only be possible on a round earth.

Hope that's enough proof.
F = m*a.
F = m*v^2/r.
F = -G*m1*m2/r^2.