*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7653
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #1420 on: May 15, 2017, 02:18:32 PM »
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

*

Offline Pete Svarrior

  • e
  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 16073
  • (◕˽ ◕ ✿)
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #1421 on: May 15, 2017, 03:14:15 PM »
Holy shit, we need to get in on this. Imagine being able to supply memes to President Trump.
Read the FAQ before asking your question - chances are we already addressed it.
Follow the Flat Earth Society on Twitter and Facebook!

If we are not speculating then we must assume

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7653
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #1422 on: May 15, 2017, 05:16:13 PM »
Holy shit, we need to get in on this. Imagine being able to supply memes to President Trump.
We could probably get Tom Bishop as a special science advisor.

Too bad Thork isn't here. We could have thrown him in there too.  Two angry, terrible people?  They'd get along.
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

*

Offline honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3347
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #1423 on: May 16, 2017, 01:29:41 AM »
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7653
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #1424 on: May 16, 2017, 05:11:48 AM »
http://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN18B2MX

But the emails?


Dude, its cool.  They were talking strategy.
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

*

Offline Pete Svarrior

  • e
  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 16073
  • (◕˽ ◕ ✿)
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #1425 on: May 16, 2017, 07:52:30 AM »
http://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN18B2MX

But the emails?
Quote
the president has the authority to disclose even the most highly classified information at will
oh ok

Coming up next: top intelligence officials and also someone from the Democratic party call for Trump's impeachment following news that he pees while sitting down.
Read the FAQ before asking your question - chances are we already addressed it.
Follow the Flat Earth Society on Twitter and Facebook!

If we are not speculating then we must assume

Re: Trump
« Reply #1426 on: May 16, 2017, 08:12:26 AM »
Smash the MSM!!!
Free dissemination of information!!!

I loved it when he was giving it to the media, seems like he's stopped attacking them as much which is sad.

The media exists to make money Dave, nothing else, don't be so naive.

Re: Trump
« Reply #1427 on: May 16, 2017, 08:14:03 AM »
Holy shit, we need to get in on this. Imagine being able to supply memes to President Trump.

Dude he retweeted a Pepe meme.
Get on board.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7653
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #1428 on: May 16, 2017, 08:14:14 AM »
I heard on the radio it was confirmed false. 




Smash the MSM!!!
Free dissemination of information!!!

I loved it when he was giving it to the media, seems like he's stopped attacking them as much which is sad.

The media exists to make money Dave, nothing else, don't be so naive.


Yessss....
Most things do.
Most people do.


What is your point?
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

Re: Trump
« Reply #1429 on: May 16, 2017, 08:15:09 AM »
That the media isn't to be trusted on face value, their agenda is profits not truth.


*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7653
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #1430 on: May 16, 2017, 09:30:22 AM »
That the media isn't to be trusted on face value, their agenda is profits not truth.




And?
They want ratings, clicks, advertisers, papers sold, etc... So they give people what they want.


Of course, how does one determine truth without the media?  I mean, have you interviewed government officials to get the truth?  And if so, do you publish what you found?

If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

*

Offline honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3347
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #1431 on: May 16, 2017, 12:37:53 PM »
Quote
the president has the authority to disclose even the most highly classified information at will
oh ok

You are very easily satisfied if that's your only concern.
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

Rama Set

Re: Trump
« Reply #1432 on: May 16, 2017, 12:45:52 PM »
I heard on the radio it was confirmed false. 

Trump would disagree.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7653
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #1433 on: May 16, 2017, 01:24:14 PM »
I heard on the radio it was confirmed false. 

Trump would disagree.
Notice how he doesn't say what he shared so its up in the air.
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

*

Offline rooster

  • *
  • Posts: 4139
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #1434 on: May 16, 2017, 02:06:20 PM »
http://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN18B2MX

But the emails?
Quote
the president has the authority to disclose even the most highly classified information at will
oh ok

Coming up next: top intelligence officials and also someone from the Democratic party call for Trump's impeachment following news that he pees while sitting down.
It's actually more serious than that as it breaks espionage etiquette and puts other intelligence operatives at risk. It means our allies might not want to share information with us anymore.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7653
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #1435 on: May 16, 2017, 02:34:15 PM »
http://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN18B2MX

But the emails?
Quote
the president has the authority to disclose even the most highly classified information at will
oh ok

Coming up next: top intelligence officials and also someone from the Democratic party call for Trump's impeachment following news that he pees while sitting down.
It's actually more serious than that as it breaks espionage etiquette and puts other intelligence operatives at risk. It means our allies might not want to share information with us anymore.
You really think they still do with Donald "From Russia with Love" Trump?
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

*

Offline Roundy

  • Abdicator of the Zetetic Council
  • *
  • Posts: 4183
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #1436 on: May 16, 2017, 03:12:42 PM »
The official statement released that the story is false doesn't actually dispute any of the points made in the story (it kind of pretends it does in a masterpiece of political doubletalk). I therefore see no reason to not consider the story confirmed, since surely if there was something legitimate to contend they would have done so.
Dr. Frank is a physicist. He says it's impossible. So it's impossible.
My friends, please remember Tom said this the next time you fall into the trap of engaging him, and thank you. :)

*

Offline Rushy

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 8569
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #1437 on: May 16, 2017, 03:32:18 PM »
The official statement released that the story is false doesn't actually dispute any of the points made in the story (it kind of pretends it does in a masterpiece of political doubletalk). I therefore see no reason to not consider the story confirmed, since surely if there was something legitimate to contend they would have done so.

I don't think official statements are required to give detailed debunking of what could be a completely invented story.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39937258

Nevermind, lmao.

Re: Trump
« Reply #1438 on: May 16, 2017, 08:03:07 PM »
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/who-would-benefit-tax-cut-partnerships-and-other-pass-throughs
Quote
What did TPC find? If Congress applied the 15 percent rate to the broad definition of income, the 10-year revenue loss could be as much as $2 trillion. If it chose the narrow definition, the revenue loss could be only about half as much.

With the broad income definition, three-quarters of the benefit would go to highest-income one percent of households, who make $700,000 or more. They’d get an average tax cut of about $76,000, or 4.8 percent of their after-tax income

By contrast, fewer than five percent of middle-income households would get a tax cut, averaging $370.

that trump duped so many middle-class americans into believing that a new york real estate magnate gives a fuck about them would be funny if it weren't so tragic.

also lolololol: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/05/16/trump-acknowledges-facts-shared-with-russian-envoys-during-white-house-meeting/?utm_term=.983d910354cd

Quote
McMaster added that Trump made a spur-of-the-moment decision to share the information in the context of the conversation he was having with the Russian officials. He said that "the president wasn’t even aware of where this information came from" and had not been briefed on the source.

so just to be clear, it was wholly appropriate for trump share sensitive intelligence with russian officials because he was so ignorant of its origins and context?  is that a joke?
« Last Edit: May 16, 2017, 09:46:16 PM by garygreen »
I have visited from prestigious research institutions of the highest caliber, to which only our administrator holds with confidence.

Re: Trump
« Reply #1439 on: May 16, 2017, 10:58:48 PM »
It was wholly appropriate because he's the president?

Why are we still falling for the cold war meme?