Then whats making them circle earth?
hmm... ok lets put it this way.
How is hundreds of trillions of stars and possibly quadrillions of planets all circling the earth, locked together traveling at nigh on the speed of light to create a gravitational effect on earth, simpler than the earth being round and gravity existing?
You use special relativity to validate UA, so Einstein could come up with that and be right, but General Relativity isn't good enough?
You asked earlier if I would go against Albert Einstein on special relativity, and you're right, I wouldn't. But why would you go against him on General Relativity? The reasoning seems the same. Why is one good and the other not?