Recent Posts

21
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Gravity (2.0)
« Last post by junker on Today at 03:20:56 AM »
Is anyone going to respond

Hi there, I would suggest you stop making double and triple posts. If people want to reply, they will. Spamming the FE fora is considered low-content posting and is against the rules. I would also suggest you take a look at the wiki and FAQ, as it is clear you are lacking in the fundamentals of FET. It will answer some of your questions, whether or not you like the answer is another story. You will find that if you ask the very basics of FE, members here will simply direct you to the wiki as they have answered those questions hundreds of time.

If you have a specific question, feel free to ask it. In the mean time, I would suggest reviewing the Equivalence Principle, acceleration using Special Relativity, as well as coordinate acceleration vs. proper acceleration.
22
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Density and the replacement of gravity.
« Last post by junker on Today at 03:13:26 AM »
Can you show 2 opposing arguments I am trying to equivilate?  Or did you just make that up to try and look smart in front of all of your friends?
Do you really not understand what a false equivalence is? Are you just trolling at this point? I guess I will bite for at least one more post. You tried to make an equivalence between Tom stating that no one knows the mechanism that makes gravity function with a claim that he doesn't know how his electronics function. Those are not equivalent, as much as you might hope them to be.

Whether or not they can explain exactly how gravity works
I suppose it is a good thing no one is asking anyone to explain "exactly" how gravity works. I would suggest you go back and read the thread again to clear up your obvious misunderstanding.

How old my account is is completely irrelevant. 
False.

You dismissing the information I have provided
Also false. Have you actually read the thread?

which is the MO for all FE believers,
Citation needed...

You just all seem to run away as soon as facts start flying around. 
Cool, more baseless claims. Feel free to provide evidence, unless you don't mind coming off as being ignorant. Hasn't seemed to stop you so far.

You can observe the evidence of this yourself if you simply look at the forums and at which point you and your tin-foil hat club seem to always disappear from the conversation.
I am starting to wonder if you have actually read any threads at all.

Flat earth has nothing to do with my "dislike".  It is the completely arrogant, intentional bullshit that is the problem.
What is arrogant?

Anyone who challenges you is being irrational.
Ah, now you are moving on to strawmen. Nice.

Anyone who presents facts is brainwashed.  Anyone who shows a picture has faulty equipment.
Feel free to keep making things up. Whatever makes you feel better.

When presented with a situation you have no real answer for, you either disappear, or redirect the conversation into something about how the person isn't worthy of having the conversation
Citation needed...

or you are not responding because it is irrational.  In reality you are just running away because you are too weak to admit, even to yourself, that you are wrong.
Running away from what? Do you realize how entitled you sound. And yet, you literally have made no arguments. You cannot provide evidence, you just make claims.

It is clear you are more about taking a stand and just trying to brush the opposition of reality under the rug than you are about trying to be objective and coming to a logical observable conclusion.  You are in no position to claim that anyone hasn't provided any evidence of anything.  Not one thing you have said on this site that I have seen qualifies as evidence. 
I can see how you might come to that conclusion given that you clearly haven't read the posts or done any research. Keep attacking that strawman, though. I won't stop you. You seem to have a victim complex, you really should work on that.

You are a childish, arrogant hypocrite, and the sooner you learn to accept that and grow up, the better off you will be.
This is what projection looks like, children. Take note, as it is very unhealthy.


If you decide you ever want to have an actual conversation, the forum will be here. If all you plan to do is complain, then I would suggest limiting your posts to the Angry Ranting forum. It was designed just for angsty round earthers such as yourself. I wish you the best, friend!  :)
23
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Gravity (2.0)
« Last post by Boots on Today at 02:41:41 AM »
What is the meaning of 'Check you messages'?
Click
24
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Gravity (2.0)
« Last post by yash.paz123 on Today at 02:39:11 AM »
If the moon and the stars all have a gravitational pull, then why doesn't the "flat-earth"?
25
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Gravity (2.0)
« Last post by yash.paz123 on Today at 02:37:15 AM »
What is the meaning of 'Check you messages'?
26
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Gravity (2.0)
« Last post by yash.paz123 on Today at 02:36:15 AM »
five septillion, nine hundred seventy-two sextillion.
two hundred sixty billion.
27
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Gravity (2.0)
« Last post by Boots on Today at 02:35:05 AM »
Check your messages
28
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Gravity (2.0)
« Last post by yash.paz123 on Today at 02:31:08 AM »
Mass: 5,972,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 kilograms.
Volume: 260,000,000,000 cubic miles.

These are the facts.
29
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Gravity (2.0)
« Last post by yash.paz123 on Today at 02:27:48 AM »
Can one of the flat-earth believers please tell me what exactly is the volume and mass of this so-called "earth-disk".
30
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Gravity (2.0)
« Last post by yash.paz123 on Today at 02:24:37 AM »
I found this link on the Forum. Universal Acceleration is bogus in this situation.
http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/earth/geophysics/missing-gravity.htm