Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - junker

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 99  Next >
1
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Density and the replacement of gravity.
« on: July 25, 2017, 09:45:20 PM »
All you did was the equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting 'fake news!' at him.
False.

LIGO DID in fact detect gravitational waves https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/12/science/ligo-gravitational-waves-black-holes-einstein.html
Maybe that is what the person I was responding to should have said, then...

While this is theory, this is still the current scientific consensus, and it's not a terrible stretch to say gravitational waves proved gravitons.
I disagree. It is quite a stretch.

2
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Density and the replacement of gravity.
« on: July 25, 2017, 08:57:52 PM »
Wow!  What a clever and compelling argument!   Just grab a few random sentences from my post and say "FALSE!" to all of them!   I like it.   Very "FE" of you.

Yes, I point out false statements when I see them. I am sorry if that bothers you. You should do your research before posting if you would like to prevent that from happening in the future.

3
Thanks for the count !  Does that "we" include yourself ?
But I think it has been said close to 7 billion times  "around"  (if you'll pardon the pun) the world !


Celestial gears: Oh man, that's a great one.  Does anyone have to lube the gear bearings or is there a celestial grease gun?

Please refrain from off-topic, and low-content posting in the upper fora, especially Flat Earth Debate. Gecko, you already know better.

Consider this a warning to you both.

4
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: No Religion= Peace
« on: July 22, 2017, 06:47:32 PM »
IF THE EARTH IS FLAT .... then explain why you do not always have a direct straight line of sight to the Sun < No FErs gotta answer for this ?

Are you sure you're in the correct thread? Please try to stay on topic.

6
All you said was "do research"
Yes, because everything that was posted has been covered in the wiki and in various threads on these very fora.

you didn't actually reply to any of his points.
False.

Or mine. So, I'll ask YOU. What's the force that causes objects to accelerate to the ground?
Ah, so you have not read the wiki either. That is apparent based on the very existence of this nonsensical thread. The entire thread is literally a strawman.

7
Well do you actually have a reply to him?

Of course. It was in the post you quoted. I would suggest you go back and read the thread again if you are confused.

If there is something you want to debate, then feel free to make a point. Otherwise, I will ask you to refrain from making posts that do not contribute to the discussion.

8
2) The Earth is accelerating upwards at 9.8 m/s/s because of...magic pixie dust...whatever.   This would indeed reproduce all the effects of gravity.  Albert Einstein was kind enough to prove that equivalence in his General theory of relativity.   The first complaint of most RE'ers about this is that after a billion years of this acceleration, the world would be going faster than light and that's not possible...but enter Albert Einstein again - and because time/length and mass change for the people inside the moving Earth - any outside observer would see the earth's acceleration being slowed by the slowing passage of time as it goes faster - so it never exceeds light speed...and for people on the accelerating earth, there is no problem whatever.   The reason this theory cannot be true is that gravity is measurably different at the equator compared to the poles - and the earth can only accelerate at one rate without tearing itself apart.   So although this is by far the most popular FE theory on this forum, it's also BUSTED.

Well, since you used all capital letters, you must be right. It is clear you have done no research into UA, otherwise you would know that your points have literally been addressed. I would suggest you maybe do some research before you post again so you don't come off so ignorant. It would also probably be good if you refreshed yourself on acceleration and Special Relativity as well. It would help the conversation move forward.

10
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Density and the replacement of gravity.
« on: July 21, 2017, 01:48:10 AM »

We don't need to directly detect a graviton
False.

because we've detected gravity waves...and they provide PRECISELY the same level of proof as their particulate dual.
Also false.


So yeah - we know gravity is a thing that's carried by a wave
There seems to be a pattern here.


Feel free to retract your claim at any time.
Why? You have literally done nothing to fulfill the requirement for me to do so.

12
Do you enjoy arguing with yourself? No one here is a proponent of this density model. I think you have the wrong forum.

13
Flat Earth General / Re: Why is NASA sociopathic organisation?
« on: July 20, 2017, 01:05:30 AM »
Well, one of us is definitely confused. You don't even know if the earth is flat or not. Do you?
If you are going to post in the FE discussion fora, please stay on topic. I am trying to be patient here.


Secondly, didn't you delete my other post which had much smaller picture? Do you have something against cats? Why do I have to use smiley faces?
I didn't delete any of your posts. I split them out of this thread and moved them to a forum where spamming cat pictures is not against the rules. 

Please ensure your next posts remain on topic so as not to further derail the thread.

14
Flat Earth General / Re: Why is NASA sociopathic organisation?
« on: July 19, 2017, 11:19:17 PM »
I get that you are new, so I will give you another warning to refrain from low-content posting in the upper fora and spamming a thread. Continued low-content posts will result in a 3-day ban.

Also, refrain from arguing moderation in the same thread where you received a warning. All it does is derail a thread further. We have a forum for you to post any concerns you may have. I see you posted a concern, albeit in the wrong forum (I went ahead and moved that for you).

I'd suggest reading the rules and respecting the upper fora. We have fora dedicated to shitposting and you are welcome to post your nonsense there.

How is your FES makes sense to you and how does my theory does not? Iran has an image satellite and they are refusing to release the pictures to the public. Why are you deleting my opinions and keeping others? Iran might have the pictures that you have being waiting for.

I think you are confused. You weren't warned for your opinion. You were warned for including giant cat pictures in your posts which did not have anything to do with your opinion, or the topic. Then, you argued about the warning you received which only served to derail the thread further.

We have other fora where you can spam cat pictures. The FE discussion fora are more strictly moderated. Again, I would suggest you read the rules and the descriptions of each fora.

15
Flat Earth Debate / Re: High Places
« on: July 19, 2017, 03:35:46 PM »
I recently went to a county fair. From the ferris wheel, I could plainly see the curvature of the earth at the top.  This is true for tall buildings as well. How can this be possible if the Earth is flat?

You absolutely cannot discern curvature on a Ferris wheel or from the top of buildings. You cannot even discern it as a passenger on common commercial airliners. This is true in even the round earth model, so I am afraid your eyes are deceiving you. You'd have to be at a very high altitude and have a wide field of view to perceive curvature in the round earth model.

16
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: NASA Conspiracy History
« on: July 19, 2017, 03:24:31 AM »

Are you trying to imply that because I have not spent the time myself refuting every fact on your wiki that it hasn't already been done?

You haven't refuted a single thing beyond your method of "nuh uh." Similar to how a child behaves when they don't know what they are talking about but still insist they are right. Well done, friend.

17
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Height of the sun by season - explain please
« on: July 19, 2017, 03:19:46 AM »
Fuck off with your warnings, you miserable tin-foil hat wearing narcissist.  My response to his question was entirely valid, and your feelings on the matter are irrelevant.
Oh boy... Another tantrum... Have a week off.

[/quote]
I have unlimited email and IP addresses at my disposal.
[/quote]
False.


18
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Density and the replacement of gravity.
« on: July 19, 2017, 03:17:30 AM »
Blah blah blah...
This has literally been the entirety of your claims thus far. Well done.


Be honest...how much time did you spend on typing that bullshit?  The only part I am having problems figuring out is if you are trying to convince other people you are not bat shit stupid, or if you are trying to convince yourself...or maybe both.

Oh good, you are projecting again.

19
Flat Earth General / Re: Why is NASA sociopathic organisation?
« on: July 19, 2017, 12:18:44 AM »
I get that you are new, so I will give you another warning to refrain from low-content posting in the upper fora and spamming a thread. Continued low-content posts will result in a 3-day ban.

Also, refrain from arguing moderation in the same thread where you received a warning. All it does is derail a thread further. We have a forum for you to post any concerns you may have. I see you posted a concern, albeit in the wrong forum (I went ahead and moved that for you).

I'd suggest reading the rules and respecting the upper fora. We have fora dedicated to shitposting and you are welcome to post your nonsense there.


20
Flat Earth General / Re: Why is NASA sociopathic organisation?
« on: July 18, 2017, 09:33:43 PM »

Maybe, USA hates Iran because Iran is threatening to release the pictures of the earth.

<obnoxious image>

Please refrain from low-content posting in the upper fora. Warned.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 99  Next >