Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« Reply #580 on: November 19, 2015, 12:20:26 PM »
There is an event which has gone virtually unnoticed (even in the various websites devoted to conspiracies), and which could be used to unleash a large scale conflict in the Middle East.

It is obvious that it is not going to be something related to Turkey invading northern Syria, or Yemen invading southern SA aiming for Mecca, or Nato pushing ever eastward in Europe, or a new 9/11 type of event, something bigger is needed.

One might ask: what would be the reason to go to war, at any cost? It has everything to do with the knowledge (at the highest possible levels of various secret societies) about the precise moment in time when a major astronomical cataclysm will take place in the future.

« Last Edit: November 19, 2015, 01:35:07 PM by sandokhan »

Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« Reply #581 on: November 19, 2015, 04:48:38 PM »
The stimulus trap (term coined by Peter Schiff) which has been going on ever since 2008, is carefully planned to occur in parallel with the other political/military events.

Here is the shadow rate:




As an example of the social events planned for the Western world...

Toward Soviet America by William Z. Foster. Head of the Communist Party USA, Foster indicates that a National Department of Education would be one of the means used to develop a new socialist society in the U.S (which actually came into being in 1979-1980).

Co-signer of the Humanist Manifesto, C.F. Potter said in 1930:  "Education is thus a most powerful ally of humanism, and every American public school is a school of humanism. What can the theistic Sunday schools, meeting for an hour once a week, teaching only a fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic teaching?


On September 18, 2015, Cong. Mike Pompeo (R) sent a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry, which included this statement:

I have reviewed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) between the P5+1 and Islamic Republic of Iran – or at least the parts of the agreement that were provided to Congress by the administration. 

During that review, I found that the copies provided to Congress of the JCPOA are not signed by any of the P5+1 members nor by Iran.




Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« Reply #583 on: November 25, 2015, 07:46:28 AM »


“Disregarding these warnings, both planes, at an altitude of 19,000 feet, violated Turkish national airspace to a depth of 1.36 miles and 1.15 miles in length for 17 seconds from 9:24:05 local time."

Disregarding that a Su-24 has a top speed of some 1300 km/hr, why would the Russians send in such an aircraft knowing that it has no chance against a F-16?

Why not send in a Su-30, or a Su-34, which could have taken down immediately both F-16 fighter planes?

Some journalists said that the Russians wanted to see how far they can push Turkey, and that now they found out. But it doesn't work like that. The Russians knew very well from the very start of their operations in Syria that such an incident might arise, which makes even more strange the decision to send in a Su-24 instead of the much more powerful aircrafts which the Turkish military would have never dared to attack in the first place.
« Last Edit: November 25, 2015, 07:55:21 AM by sandokhan »

Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« Reply #584 on: November 25, 2015, 08:10:33 AM »


“Disregarding these warnings, both planes, at an altitude of 19,000 feet, violated Turkish national airspace to a depth of 1.36 miles and 1.15 miles in length for 17 seconds from 9:24:05 local time."

Disregarding that a Su-24 has a top speed of some 1300 km/hr, why would the Russians send in such an aircraft knowing that it has no chance against a F-16?

Turkey's F-16C/D's are entirely capable of taking down any Russian fighter currently stationed in Syria or anywhere else.

Why not send in a Su-30, or a Su-34, which could have taken down immediately both F-16 fighter planes?

Because the mission wasn't to take down Turkish F-16's within their own airspace. That would be incredibly stupid and entirely pointless.

Some journalists said that the Russians wanted to see how far they can push Turkey, and that now they found out. But it doesn't work like that. The Russians knew very well from the very start of their operations in Syria that such an incident might arise, which makes even more strange the decision to send in a Su-24 instead of the much more powerful aircrafts which the Turkish military would have never dared to attack in the first place.

Do you really think the Turkish Air Force is going to shrink from a scary air superiority fighter entering their air space? It's their skies, they can and will exercise whatever force they deem necessary, and they're more than equipped to handle any aircraft in Russian inventory.

*

Offline Fortuna

  • *
  • Posts: 2979
    • View Profile
Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« Reply #585 on: November 25, 2015, 10:25:45 AM »
Not going to war for Turkey if Russia decides to spank them, no sir.

Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« Reply #586 on: November 25, 2015, 12:01:26 PM »


Turkey uses conventional Western technology; compared to the Russians, they are nowhere near the scalar radar wave discoveries made in the former USSR.

To understand what is going on we must go back to the Tunguska explosion.

The Soviets understood very fast that it could not have been caused by either a comet, or an asteroid, or a meteorite; moreover, they calculated the trajectory of the fireball to the very mile, no natural object is capable of achieving such a deliberately modified orbit.

And they found out about Tesla's lab and the new laws of physics he was establishing at the time, based on scalar waves (scalar wave = subquark wave/string).


So, Stalin turned to the physicists and engineers of the Soviet Academy of Sciences and made them an offer they could not refuse: either you come up with something just as powerful, and very fast, or you will take an unexpected trip to Siberia.

Knowing what was good for them, the Soviet Academicians did not dare to debate or protest against his ultimatum to search every field of knowledge, no matter what. Instead, Academy scientists vigorously turned to a massive search for the new breakthrough area. Scientific literature from the West was hauled to Russia by the shipload. Thousands of Soviet PhDs and engineers were put to work in huge analysis institutes, sifting through the literature and digesting it—and carefully noting anomalies and areas which should be followed up. Nothing even remotely approaching such a technical digestion and analysis effort has ever been attempted in the West.

Several years after WWII, then, the Soviets should have been embarked on experimentation with a Moray prototype amplifier. They should have been deeply involved in time-reversed EM wave experimentation to rediscover what Tesla actually had done in wireless transmission of energy without loss. Also, the earlier Kaluza-Klein unified electromagnetics and gravitation theory(1921-1926) could not have eluded the Soviet scientists, who have consistently led the world in nonlinear mathematics. Of necessity, the search for a new breakthrough area would have initiated intensive review of the foundations of physics and electromagnetics, in an effort to discover any "holes" that might exist. Thus the short debate at the turn of the century, that established Heaviside's limited version of Maxwell's EM theory—largely because of Western repugnance for Maxwell's use of Hamilton's difficult quaternions— would not have gone undetected.

The Soviets, having lead the world in non-linear science and mathematics would have by the mid 1950’s had an intensive development program on these radar time reversed weapons. (radar waves are one step lower than scalar waves).



This is how the Soviet Cosmospheres (using, of course, the Biefeld-Brown effect) came into existence.

Canada, Great Britain and USA have made some progress along the same lines, but nowhere near the discoveries made by the Soviet scientists in the field of Scalar Electromagnetics.

And the Tianjin explosions were caused by using Western scalar weapons (equivalent to a 5 kiloton blast).






The Russians have aircraft modified to use scalar EM mode, which can employ scalar beam and radar interference, thus having the ability to outperform Western technology.

Here is what a Su-24 equipped with scalar radar technology can do:

https://futuristrendcast.wordpress.com/2014/11/19/what-frightened-the-uss-donald-cook-so-much-in-the-black-sea/

« Last Edit: November 25, 2015, 12:48:39 PM by sandokhan »

Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« Reply #587 on: November 25, 2015, 02:47:20 PM »
yeah but i read that turkey has the super implodo beam that makes anything implode using the thomas edison hyper-cheetos superquark ray gun.
I have visited from prestigious research institutions of the highest caliber, to which only our administrator holds with confidence.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7653
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« Reply #588 on: November 26, 2015, 07:50:51 AM »
One step above microwaves is infra red.
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« Reply #589 on: November 27, 2015, 09:15:35 AM »
Turkey uses conventional Western technology; compared to the Russians, they are nowhere near the scalar radar wave discoveries made in the former USSR.

Compared to the Russians, who still use PESA radar systems in their cutting edge fighters. It's commonly held that Russian radar systems are inferior to what the west put out.

To understand what is going on we must go back to the Tunguska explosion.

The Soviets understood very fast that it could not have been caused by either a comet, or an asteroid, or a meteorite; moreover, they calculated the trajectory of the fireball to the very mile, no natural object is capable of achieving such a deliberately modified orbit.

And they found out about Tesla's lab and the new laws of physics he was establishing at the time, based on scalar waves (scalar wave = subquark wave/string).

Right, should've expected this from you.

Here is what a Su-24 equipped with scalar radar technology can do:

https://futuristrendcast.wordpress.com/2014/11/19/what-frightened-the-uss-donald-cook-so-much-in-the-black-sea/

It can fly within a few thousand feet of a US destroyer? Oh no.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7653
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« Reply #590 on: November 27, 2015, 09:58:19 AM »
If you read the link it talks about an all encompassing EMP like weapon on a plane.
The comments then talk about a radar jammer on the wings.


The author claims to not be a tech expert and praises the cross-eyed system link which she again leaves the tech up to others and see's the big picture.


Kinda contradictory, eh?
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« Reply #591 on: November 27, 2015, 10:48:06 AM »


For a basic idea of who these guys are and what they're doing, there's the Wikipedia page

You won't get very far with the vickypedia pages... you need much more than that.

The key to understanding what is going on in Syria is the large presence of Chechen military personnel within the ranks of isil.


Russian scalar radar technology: project Khibiny

Russian technology and developments in the field of electronic warfare are among the most advanced in the world and hidden from the public gaze.



Khibiny: Terror of the destroyers

This relatively small container in the shape of a torpedo is mounted on the wingtips of the aircraft and makes the sky machines invulnerable to all modern means of defence and enemy fighters. After the crew receives missile attack alert, Khibiny comes into action and covers the fighter with radio-electronic protective hood, which prevents the missile from reaching the target and makes it deviate from the course. Khibiny increases the survivability of the aircraft by 25-30 times.


Also read:

http://sputniknews.com/military/20150304/1019042643.html


A history of scalar radar weapons:

http://www.cheniere.org/books/analysis/history.htm
« Last Edit: November 27, 2015, 11:01:07 AM by sandokhan »

Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« Reply #592 on: November 27, 2015, 11:50:33 AM »



There's nothing terribly amazing about an EW truck. You don't need magical technology to feed false information to an AWACS, or flat out fire as much noise as you can at it. In a real conflict, a truck with a big dish on the back is the last place you'd want to be. Anything with a big dish is also a big target, regardless of how effective it may be at blinding enemy aircraft.

This relatively small container in the shape of a torpedo is mounted on the wingtips of the aircraft and makes the sky machines invulnerable to all modern means of defence and enemy fighters. After the crew receives missile attack alert, Khibiny comes into action and covers the fighter with radio-electronic protective hood, which prevents the missile from reaching the target and makes it deviate from the course. Khibiny increases the survivability of the aircraft by 25-30 times.

Western nations have had EW pods for a long time as well. They're not a magic bullet that grant you invulnerability. They also don't do jack shit against IR guided missiles.

Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« Reply #593 on: November 27, 2015, 02:54:43 PM »


Western technology is based on radio ripples in the sea of ether, that is, Hertzian waves.

By contrast, scalar wave technology is based on non-Hertzian waves.

An ordinary electromagnetic wave consists of two scalar waves.

Scalar radar waves function markedly different from ordinary radar devices.

A signal can be injected directly into such a scalar wave, without causing any kind of ripples in the ether, this constitutes true wireless technology.

Then, the radar itself becomes a powerful weapon: once it receives a return signal from a target, a very powerful scalar wave pulse can be generated, and all the energy in that pulse can be returned to the distant target.


To understand what is going in Syria, one has to go back to Afghanistan (1979). Contrary to what has been publicized in the West, there were no significant losses due to the Stinger missile (see http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html ).

At first glance, as described by most political analysts, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan remains a deeply puzzling event.

Most importantly, the external threat to Afghanistan was much exaggerated by the Soviets to justify their action. Prior to the invasion, the mujahidin was weak, divided, and in no position to seize control of the country, let alone expand its activities to the Soviet Central Asian republics. The suggestion that Amin was on the verge of reorienting his country towards the West is also found to be without foundation.

The action is also shown to have possessed little immediately understandable logic in the context of Moscow's dealings with the Afghan regime, while simultaneously presenting several predictable costs to both the Soviet Union's international standing and domestic affairs. Even more interesting is the finding from archival research that earlier in 1979 the CPSU Politburo had, in no uncertain terms, dismissed the option of a major deployment of Soviet troops to Afghanistan, having shown themselves to be very much alive to the high risks involved. There can be little doubt therefore that the Soviet decision to launch the invasion must be considered an extraordinary undertaking and an event meriting close study.

Since the Second World War, Soviet economic penetration of Afghanistan had grown steadily. Moscow had taken the leading role in developing the country's physical infrastructure, building up its mining industry, gas pipelines, airfields, and road network, including the Salang Tunnel through the Hindu Kush, which served as the main artery connecting Afghanistan to the Soviet Union. In total, the Soviets had already completed 71 separate projects in Afghanistan by April 1978 and another 60 had been agreed upon; Soviet-Afghan trade had come to account for 70–80 percent of the Afghan total. As Milan Hauner summarizes: “Taken together, the Soviet aid program was a carefully calibrated Soviet economic penetration of a neighboring country: long before they sent a single soldier across the Afghan border, the Soviet presence in the country was already overpowering”.

Had the Soviet Union proceeded more cautiously and not subverted what had been a highly favorable situation for them, Moscow would almost certainly have retained a leading role in Afghanistan and, via its economic and personnel investments, continued to have exerted considerable influence over any regime in Kabul.

However, instead of proceeding with its established policy of gradual integration and prudent maintenance of good relations with all Kabul regimes, Moscow adopted a bold and incredibly costly change in strategy, risking all of their slowly accumulated gains for an ally of seemingly little value. To look at it another way, having carefully consumed a sizeable piece of the Afghan cake, the Soviets attempted to gulp down the rest in a single, overzealous bite.


Why, then, would the Soviets proceed in such a reckless manner?


Yuriy Andropov, head of the New Kremlin:

Would our forces really help them here? In this case, tanks and armored vehicles cannot be of assistance. I think that we should say directly to Comrade Taraki that we support all of their actions and will render the help which we have agreed today and yesterday, but in no way can we move to an introduction of forces to Afghanistan. […] To bring in troops, this means to fight against the people, to suppress the people, to shoot the people. We will look like aggressors, and we cannot allow this (Ob obostrenii, Bukovsky Archive, March 17–19, 1979, p. 16, p. 24).


On the basis of the factors discussed above, the Soviet decision to invade Afghanistan seems bewildering. In addition to being atypical of Moscow's established Third World policy and offering few apparent benefits and several obvious costs, the deployment of troops has been shown to have been firmly and repeatedly opposed by the Politburo just a matter of months earlier. One is therefore left to ponder, what could possibly have induced the Soviet leaders to perform so rapid a volte-face?

The answer to this question, then, makes it possible to understand what is going on in the Middle East today.
« Last Edit: November 27, 2015, 04:01:41 PM by sandokhan »

Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« Reply #594 on: November 27, 2015, 08:21:50 PM »


You need to go further than the bibliographical reference you mentioned...

https://web.archive.org/web/20070206181101/http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/red-symphony.html


Then, read the works of Dr. Peter Beter on the New Kremlin.

The Russians are not looking for war, on the contrary.

As I said, there is a very deep reason for the West trying to spark a wide conflict...


Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« Reply #596 on: December 01, 2015, 12:14:13 PM »


I already did mention the reason, in fact it is inscribed on the pyramid featured on the one dollar bill:

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1726000#msg1726000

The Sun will rise from the West at the time of Imam Mahdi's appearance.
« Last Edit: December 01, 2015, 12:15:59 PM by sandokhan »


*

Offline Fortuna

  • *
  • Posts: 2979
    • View Profile
Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« Reply #598 on: December 06, 2015, 10:16:46 AM »
I look forward to a world where politics aren't necessary. They're seriously the worst.

*

Offline Ghost Spaghetti

  • *
  • Posts: 908
  • Don't look in that mirror. It's absolutely furious
    • View Profile
Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« Reply #599 on: December 07, 2015, 09:10:59 AM »
I look forward to a world where politics aren't necessary. They're seriously the worst.

When there is no more than one person left, then?