*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7675
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: The saga of Cliven Bundy
« Reply #141 on: February 14, 2016, 07:44:58 PM »
I bet no one tries to break him out or attack th government in response.
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

Offline model 29

  • *
  • Posts: 422
    • View Profile
Re: The saga of Cliven Bundy
« Reply #142 on: February 15, 2016, 05:40:58 PM »
I mean, "white privilege" is pretty much made up, but I'm not sure what being shot by mysterious "LEO" agents has anything to do with that.
LEO simply means law enforcement officer.

*

Offline Pete Svarrior

  • e
  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 16082
  • (◕˽ ◕ ✿)
    • View Profile
Re: The saga of Cliven Bundy
« Reply #143 on: February 17, 2016, 09:13:12 AM »
LEO simply means law enforcement officer.
Thanks for the clarification, but my post remains pretty much unchanged. Where are those racist cops executing people based on "privilege"?
Read the FAQ before asking your question - chances are we already addressed it.
Follow the Flat Earth Society on Twitter and Facebook!

If we are not speculating then we must assume


Re: The saga of Cliven Bundy
« Reply #145 on: October 28, 2016, 02:05:38 AM »
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/28/us/bundy-brothers-acquitted-in-takeover-of-oregon-wildlife-refuge.html

dafuq?

Sounds like a case of jury nullification, given that the defendants apparently did not deny that they occupied federal land.

Rama Set

Re: The saga of Cliven Bundy
« Reply #146 on: October 28, 2016, 05:01:51 PM »
I hope the same happens with Dakota Pipeline protesters.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7675
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: The saga of Cliven Bundy
« Reply #147 on: October 28, 2016, 05:57:56 PM »
I hope the same happens with Dakota Pipeline protesters.
Fat chance of that.
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.