Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Snupes

Pages: < Back  1 [2] 3 4 ... 62  Next >
21
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Terrible Political Memes
« on: January 21, 2021, 02:18:38 AM »
I don't know if I've ever witnessed a thread so quickly become the exact opposite of everything the OP wanted it to be.

22
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: January 18, 2021, 08:53:48 PM »
I don't know why everyone's focusing on the legal aspect of this rather than the wild reality that anyone's okay just reading a blog post saying "these people visit pedo rapist island", see that well at least they posted a hyperlink of some sort, and just accept and post it as true without any further looking into. Doesn't matter if it's "not important" (probably shouldn't have brought it up and defended it if that's going to be the Plan B argument), that's absolutely insane.

Unless we're playing the "I'm just posting links, not implying anything" game again.

23
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: January 18, 2021, 02:07:56 AM »
Trump is always definitely going to be sworn in in about a few weeks' time from whenever "now" is at any given moment.

24
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: January 13, 2021, 09:28:14 PM »
Yeah those protests are sketch, I’ve seen nothing on TheDonald even with the Wayback Machine other than one post that warned about fake rallies and linked them.

25
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: January 10, 2021, 01:51:47 AM »
People aren't buying your false outrage and scaremongering libs ::)

My dude, everyone here is casually goofing on conspiracy theorists while waiting for the 20th to come around because we know that's the only thing that will stop any of y'all from driving this meme train. I could get God Himself to tell you Trump lost and you'd ask him if he has a PhD lol

27
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: January 08, 2021, 02:14:12 AM »
Quote
Now, Congress has certified the results. A new administration will be inaugurated on January 20. My focus now turns to ensuring a smooth, orderly and seamless transition of power. This moment calls for healing and reconciliation.

The words of a man who is definitely going to overturn some election results soon. Just, you know...any day now.

28
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Joe Biden is winning by a landslide
« on: January 06, 2021, 11:09:13 PM »
Wow. Mask off, I guess?

29
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Joe Biden is winning by a landslide
« on: January 06, 2021, 11:00:32 PM »
I'm used to Gish gallops full of nothing, not "evidence" that's literally "these crowd kept small but funny man win??" I'm not sure one can think critically and genuinely think that. It's just way more blatant than even I expected.

30
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Joe Biden is winning by a landslide
« on: January 06, 2021, 10:13:36 PM »
There's only a couple tiny things that arent shown in those pictures...

That teeny tiny pandemic that has gripped the world and killed nearly 400 000 Americans during the election cycle. So weird he couldnt fill rallies.

And the minor detail of the proportion of votes that went to Biden from big cities, and the record turnout of voters in those cities.

The problem with such assessments is that they are merely excuses without evidence. Excuses rather than positive evidence to show that such excuses have validity.

Did Joe Biden have overflow crowds of thousands of people cheering him on outside of his events, who couldn't get in, but went and stayed anyway to hear and watch what they could? Trump did.

Are there there any precidents for presidents getting such a low number of counties and record high votes for their time periods?

...is one of your claims actually that Biden holding small rallies is an indicator of fraud? Are we being that openly dishonest now?

31
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: January 04, 2021, 06:30:29 PM »
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/03/politics/trump-brad-raffensperger-phone-call-transcript/index.html

If you wanna read it instead of listen.
My god, its damning.

Trump's tantrums when people don't agree with him are delicious. When others are disagreeing with him on investigations showing the opposite of his claim:

Quote from: The President of the United States of America
Well, there's no way they could — then they're incompetent. They're either dishonest or incompetent, okay? [...] There's only two answers, dishonesty or incompetence. There's just no way. Look. There's no way. And on the other thing, I said too, there is no way. I mean, there's no way that these things could have been you know, you have all these different people that voted but they don't live in Georgia anymore. What was that number, Cleta? That was a pretty good number too.

What a five-year old.

32
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General
« on: January 03, 2021, 08:35:33 AM »
Okay, having just seen the movie today, I'm not sure if either of you are aware that there's literally a clip in the middle of the flying sequence of her getting home and getting the armor out of whatever she had it wrapped in. It's not very long, but it was enough for me to watch it and be like "oh, she's grabbing the fancy gold armor for the final fight".

33
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: December 31, 2020, 04:42:45 PM »
Don’t worry, guys, I’m not sure why you’re arguing so much. We’ll know that Biden’s president within the next couple weeks when, still, no decision has been forced.

Quote from: Снупс
@Tom: Roughly when do you think the election results will be overturned? Do you think it'll happen within the next few months? The next year? Genuinely curious.

It's all probably going to drag on until sometime shortly before Jan 20, when some decisions will be forced.

34
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: December 28, 2020, 01:51:00 AM »
Your link and quote says specifically that there are not standards across all states. Looks like you debonked yourself.

"Not all states have audits as standards, but 38 do"
"Your source says not all states have audits as standards"

Amazing observation.

Also:





It's happening! Monday, we'll finally have definitive proof that this election was fraudulent! Monday, mark it down!

35
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: December 25, 2020, 03:15:41 AM »
It is possible to provide evidence that you didn't murder someone. Establishing alibies, aquiring security cam footage that you were somewhere else at the time, showing receipts/phone location history, proving that the evidence of the murder doesn't fit your profile, proving that it was actually someone else who was the murderer. Plenty of ways.

No no, I'm not asking you to prove you didn't murder a specific person, but that you've never murdered anyone.


Benford's law is an established method of identifying evidence of election fraud. Iceman said that it was applied wrongly and that anyone who says Biden's votes don't follow Benford's law is doing it wrong. I asked for a source showing that Biden's votes do follow Benford's law and I got silence. Iceman said it was not necessary for liberals to provide such information. They just need to dismiss something as incorrect and rely on their own lacking credibility.

You got several responses about Benford's law, though, and how using it for a very deliberate and roughly uniform division of people is ridiculous, such as using it per county. If you go by random counties, you can find instances of Biden's votes following Benford's law closer than Trump's, like these two random Wisconsin counties:




Or the obvious fact that if you pull out to the state or country level, things start following Benford's law much more closely because that's closer to the scale at which it's supposed to be applied. Yeah, if you use a rule in a context other than which it's supposed to be used, it may give you wonky data.

And, of course, you're not even trying to accurately portray what Iceman said, which was that the burden of proof is on the claimant. A concept I'd be utterly aghast if you disagreed with. I assume what you're trying to say in a very bizarrely obtuse way is that the individual cases still haven't been disproven, in which case...well...I can't help ya, man. I've long accepted that your tune isn't gonna change until Biden wins, which is why I really want to get you to confirm whether or not you think any of this is actually gonna come to pass. Because I think you're refusing to state that since you know that all of this is going to amount to nothing, and if you actually state that it's gonna happen you'll have to admit to being wrong. But if you just post links and never state positively that they'll change things, you can avoid that.

So I really hope you'll answer my question this time and show me you do actually believe in Trump.

36
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: December 25, 2020, 01:31:29 AM »
I find that is embarrassing that you leftists have been on the defense, unable to produce much in the way of positive evidence for your position, thinking that your "nah uh" and refutations are actually evidence in your favor.

Do you think "you can't prove you haven't murdered someone" is a valid argument and should be considered?

Also I'm assuming your refusal to actually stake a claim on any of the bombshells that are going to turn the tide is because you know just as well that they're not going to go anywhere. Otherwise you should be pretty comfortable championing the near-certainty that Biden won't be sworn in in under a month.

37
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: December 24, 2020, 01:27:01 AM »
From the little research I've done I'm pretty sure it's possible, but it's super obviously not gonna happen because the Committee's report was so full of nothing lol. Which is why I really want Tom's answer on whether he thinks this big ol' pile of empty space is going to sway the General Assembly whatsoever, because I genuinely think he knows it won't. Seriously, I recommending reading through this and looking into any given evidence raised:

http://www.senatorligon.com/THE_FINAL%20REPORT.PDF

38
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: December 24, 2020, 12:37:31 AM »
Nope. It happened. The Georgia State Senate Judiciary committee recommended the decertification of the electors in Georgia.

Do you think that's going to actually convince the General Assembly to decertify the electors? Or will it be another bombshell that has no effect on the election? Surely you have thoughts on this.

39
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: December 23, 2020, 03:18:33 AM »
The Atlantic lol. Is that what the liberal leftists are talking about today? The debatable pardon of some people and something about a 90 year old reporter who I've never heard of?

I guess they don't want you to know the truth. The Georgia State Senate Judiciary committee is officially recommending the decertification of the electors in Georgia.

[Link to Very Real News™]

Do you think that's going to actually convince the General Assembly to decertify the electors? I want to start keeping a list of predictions.

40
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: December 21, 2020, 10:34:21 PM »
Does the author of that article have a PhD?

Pages: < Back  1 [2] 3 4 ... 62  Next >