Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
This is a little cherry picking though. Were they voting for and against a wall specifically? Or the bill as a whole?
Or surprised. Text offers little in the way of tone.Maybe I was angry?Maybe?
So following Pelosi's advice is smart . Thanks for that.Pissed that Trump did what Pelosi suggested as its smart and I wanr Trump to fail.Hence your anger as he has not failed...
Right, because he's totally not building rockets ..Not a fool and no longer any trouble now that he is being treated as a human by Trump.QuoteOh, like Kim Jong Un?You're reading too much into things.As are you if you believe this approach signifies anything like bending.
Trump is playing these people for the fools they truly are.
The chinese government, you poorly written character troll.Or China?China = many people
China ≠ these people to whom I refer (AKA: Dancy Nancy and her Chuckwagon).
Ok, I'll bite. How does waiting to give the state of the union speech in the House help with that?Please, do tell, what is his master plan?Drain the Swamp.
You remember... his campaign slogan?
Only if you work in the MSM. Then it means ratings.Because to me this sounds like a very simple "Lets report good news" move . Which is smart.Yes.
It is always good news when Trump speaks!
ALL HAIL OUR ILLUSTRIOUS AND BELOVED LEADER!
Maybe I was angry? Pissed that Trump did what Pelosi suggested as its smart and I wanr Trump to fail.You did.Trump bent to Pelosi!So, an act of deference, the very thing you critics claim he is unable to perform, is now rang as a cheer?
State of the Union delayed until the government is reopened.
https://www.npr.org/2019/01/23/687745949/trump-says-state-of-the-union-will-be-on-schedule-and-on-location
I guess the Senate isn't a good place?
Not hardly...
Just a further sign of how bankrupt douchebags can be...
Who said I was cheering?
Past highly critical posts + current exclamation point at end of "Trump bent to Pelosi!"
You're reading too much into things.As are you if you believe this approach signifies anything like bending.
Trump is playing these people for the fools they truly are.
Trump bent to Pelosi!So, an act of deference, the very thing you critics claim he is unable to perform, is now rang as a cheer?
State of the Union delayed until the government is reopened.
https://www.npr.org/2019/01/23/687745949/trump-says-state-of-the-union-will-be-on-schedule-and-on-location
I guess the Senate isn't a good place?
Not hardly...
Just a further sign of how bankrupt douchebags can be...
I may regret asking this, but what traitors?Isn't it obvious?
Just keep in mind how fast trump turns on his friends.Fast food and military tribunals clearly go hand in hand.Meanwhile, back on the ranch...
The government shutdown plan is working exactly like Trump wanted it to...
Soon, the fat will be trimmed from the hog and all these unnecessary morons can move to their dream socialist paradise...
Soon, civil court cases can be moved to military tribunal status and the traitors can be tried in an expeditious manner...
Nah. Its so the kitchen staff is home and he can have fast food every day.
Both quick and easy and so satisfying!
Meanwhile, back on the ranch...
The government shutdown plan is working exactly like Trump wanted it to...
Soon, the fat will be trimmed from the hog and all these unnecessary morons can move to their dream socialist paradise...
Soon, civil court cases can be moved to military tribunal status and the traitors can be tried in an expeditious manner...
My limited understanding of the issue is that I'm not quite clear on DACA as a bargaining chip. It's tied up in the courts and if the Supreme Court doesn't take up the Trump appeal this session then it kicks around for the better part of 2019 as is. So if all that is true, I wonder if Dems are rolling the dice and simply saying DACA is moot at the moment and will be until October, so this deal isn't really offering anything.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonleopold/trump-russia-cohen-moscow-tower-mueller-investigation
whoops.
It's just a shame that Buzzfeed doesn't actually have any evidence backing their allegations and will retract all of this quietly in a week or so.
Looks like Rushy was right:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html
Inb4 Total Lackey has no problem agreeing with this post from CNN.
That's actually pretty easy: so his base wouldn't hate him. See, the goal is division and distraction.
I wonder when libtards will give a good reason for why Russia so badly wants the US to have great unemployment and a strong economy that they'd plant an agent in the WH.
No, government agencies.2 questions:1) Is Trump currently getting paid?
Even if he was, it would hardly matter, since he has so far donated every dime of his salary to charities. One of his campaign promises was that he wouldn't accept a salary, so it seems he's trying to keep that promise.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-shutdown-we-ll-be-out-long-time-n959251
Nice. I'm going to need a new job soon if this keeps up.
]Was the president hosting a dinner? Then its a presidential dinner. Not sure what definition you're using.
It was not a presidential dinner.
He was hosting teenagers and early 20 somethings...and being the acknowledged genius he is, he took a look at the guest list and came to the only logical conclusion, that being...wait for it...KIDS THAT AGE LOVE BURGERS AND FRIES!!!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_Records_Act
No.
It isn't.
Then stop insinuating it is.I'm not insinuating a private conversation is evil. I'm insinuating that a specific private conversation between Trump and Putin has things discussed that our president is afraid will get out, even to his trusted staff.
Been 2 years . Sure is taking his time, eh?[/quote]
People are not going to be locked up until their trial, which in Hillary's case and the rest, is coming shortly.
And? They were gonna eat it no matter what. Could have been nothing but ice cream. But he could have catered something at least befitting a presidential dinner, not, ya know, a cheap date.Yeah, yeah, yeah...cupcake...You do know that professional athletes, college included, have strict nutritional rules to ensure maximum performance,yes? They are told by their nutrition coach not to each fast food.https://www.npr.org/2019/01/15/685416350/feast-fit-for-a-burger-king-trump-serves-fast-food-to-college-football-champsA) Not cheap, just pragmatic, as everyone with a sane mind knows exactly what typical food college athletes enjoy; and,
Our president...
Cheap as fuck? Or just no taste in food?
Two) No real US citizen would adopt a moniker using the word, "Lord."
Looks like they didn't freaking listen to their nutritional coach there, Einstein...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/ncaafb/clemson-qb-trevor-lawrence-calls-out-fake-twitter-quote-praising-fast-food-at-white-house/ar-BBSilUh?li=BBnb7Kz
You're right, a fail on my part . Trump took the notes. He problably kept them in a safe place incase he forgot what was said. And made sure no one else could see it . For some reason.Care to point out where the word, "destroyed," was ever used?https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-has-concealed-details-of-his-face-to-face-encounters-with-putin-from-senior-officials-in-administration/2019/01/12/65f6686c-1434-11e9-b6ad-9cfd62dbb0a8_story.htmlGuilty of what?
On the notion of acting very, very guilty. This really is a crazy meme at this point.
LOL!
Good question because no president would ever bother hiding conversations by destroying evidence. Right?
Taking notes and keeping them somewhere is not a crime.It might be for the president.
Having private conversations is not a crime.No one claimed it was.
But destroying evidence and government records is a crime...So you are for jailing Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, and Lisa Page?I haven't the power. And apparently, neither does Trump. So unless you know something he doesn't, I'm just gonna point to his lack of "locking her up" and you go ahead and try to justify why he hasn't been able to.
Better than Trump.Yeah, he hid it real well...QuoteCorrect, but he did hide evidence. Which is what Rushy said and I agreed with.Nixon didn't destroy evidence.Well, we know Nixon did. But you're right.https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-has-concealed-details-of-his-face-to-face-encounters-with-putin-from-senior-officials-in-administration/2019/01/12/65f6686c-1434-11e9-b6ad-9cfd62dbb0a8_story.htmlGuilty of what?
On the notion of acting very, very guilty. This really is a crazy meme at this point.
LOL!
Good question because no president would ever bother hiding conversations by destroying evidence. Right?
We wouldn't know, because hiding something effectively means it's hidden. It's possible no other president did something like this, or it's possible that many others did it, but more competently.
You must really like daytime soaps for the high drama and meaningful dialogue...
Along with hamsters for the high level of entertainment.
Jesus, you will believe anything...
You do know that professional athletes, college included, have strict nutritional rules to ensure maximum performance,yes? They are told by their nutrition coach not to each fast food.https://www.npr.org/2019/01/15/685416350/feast-fit-for-a-burger-king-trump-serves-fast-food-to-college-football-champsA) Not cheap, just pragmatic, as everyone with a sane mind knows exactly what typical food college athletes enjoy; and,
Our president...
Cheap as fuck? Or just no taste in food?
Two) No real US citizen would adopt a moniker using the word, "Lord."
You're right, a fail on my part . Trump took the notes. He problably kept them in a safe place incase he forgot what was said. And made sure no one else could see it . For some reason.Care to point out where the word, "destroyed," was ever used?https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-has-concealed-details-of-his-face-to-face-encounters-with-putin-from-senior-officials-in-administration/2019/01/12/65f6686c-1434-11e9-b6ad-9cfd62dbb0a8_story.htmlGuilty of what?
On the notion of acting very, very guilty. This really is a crazy meme at this point.
LOL!
Good question because no president would ever bother hiding conversations by destroying evidence. Right?
Correct, but he did hide evidence. Which is what Rushy said and I agreed with.Nixon didn't destroy evidence.Well, we know Nixon did. But you're right.https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-has-concealed-details-of-his-face-to-face-encounters-with-putin-from-senior-officials-in-administration/2019/01/12/65f6686c-1434-11e9-b6ad-9cfd62dbb0a8_story.htmlGuilty of what?
On the notion of acting very, very guilty. This really is a crazy meme at this point.
LOL!
Good question because no president would ever bother hiding conversations by destroying evidence. Right?
We wouldn't know, because hiding something effectively means it's hidden. It's possible no other president did something like this, or it's possible that many others did it, but more competently.
You must really like daytime soaps for the high drama and meaningful dialogue...
Along with hamsters for the high level of entertainment.