Roundy, I hear that kind of tactic from FE people in almost every thread. Any point made by RE and some FEer demands complete proof. Look at the equinox thread thread that I started. TomB, demanded that I prove that nearly entire earth experiences 12 hours of sun equinox. He required data from every place on the earth. He disregarded link after link that showed my claim.
How do your pictures prove that there is a 78,500 mile long ice wall surrounding the entire earth?
Do you really think that pointing out that he didn't do something that would be completely impossible to do is a solid debate tactic? Try better.
If there is an ice wall that encompasses the entire globe I would like proof of the milage and photo evidence. I would like to see a surveyors coordinates and plots. If you can't provide that then you are all spreading lies upon lies.
You all can't demand a standard from others that you are unwilling to hold yourselves to.
If we could confine things to what's happening in this thread and the people commenting in this thread, it would be swell. Whatever Tom demanded of you in another thread is irrelevant. Is Tom even in this thread anywhere? You are free to stop taking Tom seriously if he really makes a demand of you that doesn't make sense; it is your prerogative; we fucking all do from time to time. Similarly, if you are going to demand something that is blatantly impossible, why shouldn't we conclude that you've
stopped taking the subject seriously? What kind of response is that supposed to engender? Ridicule for making such a dumb request is the only thing that makes sense. If you want to give up on the debate that's fine, believe it or not you can do so without conceding that you are wrong, that's also your prerogative.
But if you and your cohort are going to demand something so dumb, a response like the one I just gave you is the only one you can reasonably expect.