I know you were homie. I am down, but Rama has to apologize and atone first. If he wants to wash my car in a speedo or something that should suffice.
An atonement should be something you will enjoy and I will not, not the other way around.
You deflected my requests for information right off the top of the thread.
Irrelevant.
Not when you claim that we never asked for information in a clear and polite manner. That is patently false.
I haven't ignored or lied about anything. Oddly enough, what you are saying here literally makes no sense as a response to what you quoted from me. Seems silly, but that's none of my business.
You either ignored that I asked you for information clearly and politely or are lying about it.
Your motivations appear to be duplicitous, as you were evasive before anything became heated.
I'll take that as an apology.
Mmmmk?
I do have a very strong basis to suspect this: you repeatedly deflected straightforward requests for information. You did the same in another thread, immaturely criticizing post formatting.
I didn't deflect at all. OP in that thread came in and made a series of demands that MUST do x or y, as if he is entitled to a response by anyone. The formatting was just a rib at him as he is notorious for terribly formatted posts and has been asked to not do that.[/quote]
He did not demand that you do anything. Stop being so dramatic. He challenged the FE community using a quote of yours, where you claimed to have knowledge of sources of information, but refuse or cannot reveal them.
You claim to have knowledge, but have done nothing to substantiate it.
What knowledge do I claim to have? That I have seen claims made by other people?
That and that their claims are legitimate. The second part is the more important part to me.
Is my word that I have seen people make claims (whether those claims are true or false) not enough to support my claim that I have seen people make claims?
I never asked you to substantiate that you have seen claims made by other people, I asked you to substantiate who you have seen. It was clearly asked, more than once.
Claiming I am nonsensical is just another Ad Hom.
Using the word "another" implies that there was a previous one. You are trying to spin some kind of narrative here and no one is falling for it.
Who else isn't falling for it? Wait, are you spinning a narrative?
While calling you nonsensical may possibly be an ad hom,
It definitely is.
your behavior is reflecting the definition of the word, so it fits.
Uhhh, not really. Others have found me to make sense, so your assertion is incorrect.
I love you guys too. Nothing Junker says here can ever change this.
I wouldn't be who I am today without you guys.
But, but, but... Tom!
Davis is fair game but you leave Tom the fuck alone.
Also, maybe a mod could lock this trainwreck at some point. All hope was lost a while ago.
[/quote]