[asdfghjkl]

Where's the proof for your quack theories? You talk big, but all I see here is psychobabble and photoshop.

[Rdrums]

Watch this video.

I literally only stumpled upon this theory a couple of days ago, I am now thoroughly convinced.

I ridiculed the concept like you, only clicking on other Youtube videos out of baked curiosity.

This is the best one I found to fully flesh out the concept.

[asdfghjkl]

Watch this video.

I literally only stumpled upon this theory a couple of days ago, I am now thoroughly convinced.

I ridiculed the concept like you, only clicking on other Youtube videos out of baked curiosity.

This is the best one I found to fully flesh out the concept.

Got any summary? I don't have time for a two hour documentary.

[Rama Set]

Watch this video.

I literally only stumpled upon this theory a couple of days ago, I am now thoroughly convinced.

I ridiculed the concept like you, only clicking on other Youtube videos out of baked curiosity.

This is the best one I found to fully flesh out the concept.

Got any summary? I don't have time for a two hour documentary.

The Earth is flat and under a dome.

[Pete Svarrior]

Hi asdfghjkl, nice name.

Please consider going through our wiki. There's a whole section on experimental evidence.

[Rdrums]

Watch this video.

I literally only stumpled upon this theory a couple of days ago, I am now thoroughly convinced.

I ridiculed the concept like you, only clicking on other Youtube videos out of baked curiosity.

This is the best one I found to fully flesh out the concept.

Got any summary? I don't have time for a two hour documentary.

Heres a comment I just posted on the video, you can try this yourself using Google Earth and see how ridiculous the flight path is. It makes no logical sense unless the globe is not real.


To the many sceptics ridiculing this theory, I was the same as you until a few days ago. However I just tried searching for flights (like he said in the video) between Buenos Aires and Wellington. The distance is said to be 6000 miles, and the range of the best commercial jets is now around 9000 miles according to Google. So why are all the quoted flights at least 22 hours long and have to fly north through the USA? I used Google Earth to visualise how ridiculous this would look. Makes no economic sense for the airlines.

https://www.expedia.co.nz/Flights-Search?trip=roundtrip&leg1=from:Wellington,%20New%20Zealand%20(WLG-Wellington%20Intl.),to:Buenos%20Aires,%20Argentina%20(EZE-Ministro%20Pistarini%20Intl.),departure:27/1/2016TANYT&leg2=from:Buenos%20Aires,%20Argentina%20(EZE-Ministro%20Pistarini%20Intl.),to:Wellington,%20New%20Zealand%20(WLG-Wellington%20Intl.),departure:3/2/2016TANYT&passengers=children:0,adults:1,seniors:0,infantinlap:N&options=cabinclass:economy,sortby:price&mode=search&paandi=true

Thats the link to the air bookings site I used (hopefully it works). Seriously you need to watch the whole video and try this yourself.

[asdfghjkl]

Watch this video.

I literally only stumpled upon this theory a couple of days ago, I am now thoroughly convinced.

I ridiculed the concept like you, only clicking on other Youtube videos out of baked curiosity.

This is the best one I found to fully flesh out the concept.

Got any summary? I don't have time for a two hour documentary.

Heres a comment I just posted on the video, you can try this yourself using Google Earth and see how ridiculous the flight path is. It makes no logical sense unless the globe is not real.


To the many sceptics ridiculing this theory, I was the same as you until a few days ago. However I just tried searching for flights (like he said in the video) between Buenos Aires and Wellington. The distance is said to be 6000 miles, and the range of the best commercial jets is now around 9000 miles according to Google. So why are all the quoted flights at least 22 hours long and have to fly north through the USA? I used Google Earth to visualise how ridiculous this would look. Makes no economic sense for the airlines.

https://www.expedia.co.nz/Flights-Search?trip=roundtrip&leg1=from:Wellington,%20New%20Zealand%20(WLG-Wellington%20Intl.),to:Buenos%20Aires,%20Argentina%20(EZE-Ministro%20Pistarini%20Intl.),departure:27/1/2016TANYT&leg2=from:Buenos%20Aires,%20Argentina%20(EZE-Ministro%20Pistarini%20Intl.),to:Wellington,%20New%20Zealand%20(WLG-Wellington%20Intl.),departure:3/2/2016TANYT&passengers=children:0,adults:1,seniors:0,infantinlap:N&options=cabinclass:economy,sortby:price&mode=search&paandi=true

Thats the link to the air bookings site I used (hopefully it works). Seriously you need to watch the whole video and try this yourself.

You do know that airlines schedule highly irregular routes to avoid going over large amounts of open ocean, right?

[Pete Svarrior]

You do know that airlines schedule highly irregular routes to avoid going over large amounts of open ocean, right?

Wow, what a convenient excuse!

"The Earth is round and flight times prove it... except when they don't... b-but there's a good reason for that, I-i swear!"

Absolutely fabulous.

[asdfghjkl]

You do know that airlines schedule highly irregular routes to avoid going over large amounts of open ocean, right?

Wow, what a convenient excuse!

"The Earth is round and flight times prove it... except when they don't... b-but there's a good reason for that, I-i swear!"

Absolutely fabulous.

I never claimed flight plans prove the Earth is round. I simply pointed out that using the occasional odd flight plans to justify a ridiculous claim is preposterous.

[Pete Svarrior]

Assuming a claim is "ridiculous" before evaluating it puts you at a risk of drawing conclusions from falsity. You may want to brush up on your logic, good sir.

[asdfghjkl]

Assuming a claim is "ridiculous" before evaluating it puts you at a risk of drawing conclusions from falsity. You may want to brush up on your logic, good sir.

Oh believe me, I've evaluated it. Who hasn't. You know, little two year old, with some dinky ideas running through their head. "Hmm, what if the earth is flat? Nah, that's ridiculous." And don't call me good sir. We both know I'm not.

[Pete Svarrior]

Oh believe me, I've evaluated it. Who hasn't. You know, little two year old, with some dinky ideas running through their head. "Hmm, what if the earth is flat? Nah, that's ridiculous."

Ah, a wonderful piece of introspection! I'm glad you admitted your closed-mindedness so readily. You truly are on a path to elementary self-awareness! Keep it up!

And don't call me good sir. We both know I'm not.

Welp, you said it, not me.

[asdfghjkl]

Oh believe me, I've evaluated it. Who hasn't. You know, little two year old, with some dinky ideas running through their head. "Hmm, what if the earth is flat? Nah, that's ridiculous."

Ah, a wonderful piece of introspection! I'm glad you admitted your closed-mindedness so readily. You truly are on a path to elementary self-awareness! Keep it up!

And don't call me good sir. We both know I'm not.

Welp, you said it, not me.

Now, now. I was only kidding. As soon as I found this website I considered the idea. However I dismissed it as it is patently ridiculous and requires a counterculture-ist, conspiracy theorist (-ist) suspension of basic teachings in lieu of a cockamammie theory which has at best some circumstantial evidence. 

[Pete Svarrior]

Right. So your reasoning seems to be "it's unintuitive to me, therefore I will dismiss it without even reading up on the basics."

I can't say I have much respect for that mindset.

[asdfghjkl]

Right. So your reasoning seems to be "it's unintuitive to me, therefore I will dismiss it without even reading up on the basics."

I can't say I have much respect for that mindset.

Clearly we are unable to effectively communicate. Send someone who reads what I say.

[Pete Svarrior]

Sweetheart, you're the one who's failed to read here. That's why you made a thread to ask a question already addressed in the FAQ.

[asdfghjkl]

Sweetheart, you're the one who's failed to read here. That's why you made a thread to ask a question already addressed in the FAQ.

I didn't fail to read the FAQs, I failed to give a shit about the FAQs.

[Pete Svarrior]

I didn't fail to read the FAQs, I failed to give a shit about the FAQs.

Yes, I said that rather early on. Why are you fighting for my side of the argument here?

[asdfghjkl]

I didn't fail to read the FAQs, I failed to give a shit about the FAQs.

Yes, I said that rather early on. Why are you fighting for my side of the argument here?

If your side of the argument is that I don't give a flying fuck about the FAQs then fine by me, you win. But that's not my argument.

[Charming Anarchist]

Clearly we are unable to effectively communicate. Send someone who reads what I say.

Who would that be? 

If you do not give a shit, what are you doing here?  Are you trapped in a cell with nothing but a computer that can ONLY access this website?