Recent Posts

21
Re:"Half-sunken ships Restored by simply lòoking at them through a Telescope"+
I think the OP has been answered.There is no way you can do this.
Except when you grab a telescope and actually do it :-*

Have you ever been to sea and actually did it ?
Are all you calling "SilentService" and myself liars ?

Let's be sure we're talking about the same thing.
Is this about a ship which has gone out of sight as it passed  beyond the norizon ? You can't restore it with a telescope.
Or is this about a ship which has become so small it can no longer be seen with the naked eye , but can be restored with a telescope before it has passed beyond the horizon ? You can restore it with a telescope.

How about an island that seems to grow out of the sea as you sail closer?

Same thing. Like the island of Oahu.....or Guam....or Japan.
22
Flat Earth General / Re: NASA is not fake.
« Last post by Dither on May 23, 2017, 09:42:00 PM »
God made us naturally curious, so I don't see that as an issue.
Why do you have God in your worldview?
And are you a FE'r, or a RE'r?   
23
Re:"Half-sunken ships Restored by simply lòoking at them through a Telescope"+
I think the OP has been answered.There is no way you can do this.
Except when you grab a telescope and actually do it :-*

Have you ever been to sea and actually did it ?
Are all you calling "SilentService" and myself liars ?

Let's be sure we're talking about the same thing.
Is this about a ship which has gone out of sight as it passed  beyond the norizon ? You can't restore it with a telescope.
Or is this about a ship which has become so small it can no longer be seen with the naked eye , but can be restored with a telescope before it has passed beyond the horizon ? You can restore it with a telescope.

How about an island that seems to grow out of the sea as you sail closer? 
24
According to the FErs ....
Satellites and the ISS do not exist and are nothing more than a Government funded Media hoax ..
all photos and video are produced in an elaborate state-of-the-art studio.

I get no answers either ..... so much for "debate" .... good luck



tonight in Wichita KS = Tue May 23, 9:51 PM   6 min   41°   11° above SSW   10° above ENE < I'll attemp to catch video

I hear you.  I just thought if an amateur non-black-helicopter type took the pictures it might make a difference.

It's really sad that there is no real debate here.   All I have gotten so far is insults and instructions to read the FAQ/Wiki where I will find my answers.  Only to find the FAQ/WIKI has no such answer.  I get it that trolls come along to poke people with a stick, but i am not one of them.  I like logical debate and discussion and I hoped to have some.  No such luck.

Quote
This website is dedicated to unraveling the true mysteries of the universe and demonstrating that the earth is flat and that Round Earth doctrine is little more than an elaborate hoax.

25
Re:"Half-sunken ships Restored by simply lòoking at them through a Telescope"+
I think the OP has been answered.There is no way you can do this.
Except when you grab a telescope and actually do it :-*

Are you calling "SilentService" and myself liars ?
Have you ever been to sea and actually did it ?
Let's be sure we're talking about the same thing.
(1) Is this about a ship which has gone out of sight as it passed, or after it has  passed,   beyond the norizon ? You can't restore it with a telescope.
(2) Or is this about a ship which has become so small it can no longer be seen with the naked eye , but can be restored with a telescope before it has passed beyond the horizon ? You can restore it with a telescope.
Been there. Done that. Both of 'em.
26
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Best arguments for FE
« Last post by Mitchell45 on May 23, 2017, 09:34:48 PM »
I'd say that the fact that the Atlantic ocean between Newfoundland and Ireland is probably the best. Another good one is that since you can see a ship that has disappear over the horizon with binoculars is good too. There is a lot of information on the FES wiki too, check it out and determine which is the best yourself. :)
27
I think that the best way to determine wheter the earth has a curve is using a laser pointer and a table with measurements to notice how the laser goes "higher" the farter we move from its origin.
Why use a laser with a beam that gets wider at farther distances?  There is a thing that has been used to do this for nearly 100 years.  It's call a theodolite.  A used digital one can be acquired for under $500.

im just saying, even if the beam gets wider, it should be noted the change in height it still shows on the measurement object on would be using. And lasers are very potent, there are some that can reach to cockpits in comercial planes.
Yes, but to to take accurate measurements  one needs a screen that is larger than the beam so the center can be detected.  Many flat earth experiments have failed for this reason.  They assume that if they can see the laser that the center of the beam is at eye level.

Has anyone ever observed, experimented on, or proven the existence of curved water, anywhere, ever?

Anyone who has ever been to sea has observed, or proven the existence of curved water , has done it many times, at sea or from the shore looking out to sea.
28
Re:"Half-sunken ships Restored by simply lòoking at them through a Telescope"+
I think the OP has been answered.There is no way you can do this.
Except when you grab a telescope and actually do it :-*

Do you have photographic evidence for this claim? None of the videos in this thread show such a phenomenon.
29
Re:"Half-sunken ships Restored by simply lòoking at them through a Telescope"+
I think the OP has been answered.There is no way you can do this.
Except when you grab a telescope and actually do it :-*
30
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Question about perspective.
« Last post by Nirmala on May 23, 2017, 09:22:15 PM »
Perspective only happens inside eye or camera. It does not happen out in the scene being viewed which is the faulty assumption in that diagram. Nothing is actually forced down to the horizon out in the world we are viewing, and so the idea that perspective could hide something behind the earth that is actually located up in the sky is completely incorrect.

Here is a video that explains it pretty well: