Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
History books.Its funny. I don't recall "vogue topic of the year" being in my American History books. But since you said it, please, cite your source. Should be easy.
Math.Then show your work. I'll wait.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/07/trump-gun-access-restrictions-1449663Laying the blame for mass shootings at Trump's feet is only going to get him re-elected.
So not only is his rhetoric spurring lunatics with guns to take personal action against the dangerous invasion taking place at our borders, his policies are actually making it easier for those lunatics to get those guns in the first place. No wonder he wants to focus on the influence of video games or what the fuck ever in the gun debate.
But let's try it.
"I now blame Trump for all mass shootings that have taken place while he has served as President. As a matter of fact, I blame Trump for all mass shootings that have taken place since he was born."
Nope...
Didn't work...still gonna vote for him.
Unless Tulsi wins the Democratic nomination.
Still waiting to know how you know what was vogue before you were born.If healthcare was in vogue then, it was within the town where the doctor was performing house calls and accepting chickens or apples in return for service.If you read my post again, I stated, "...in vogue topic."So years when laws were proposed or enacted weren't popular toics of talk? Well... How interesting.
1933-in vogue topic...fact check for you...world wide Great Depression, Hitler...not health care...
1949 - in vogue topic...fact check for you...The Marshall Plan...Cold War commencement...Korean Peninsula...not health care...
Medicare and Medicaid not dominant subject topic during the 60's...Vietnam War, Charles Manson, burning bras, Abby Hoffman...
Clinton HIPAA, piling on costs...
Obama ACA, "...we will need to pass it to see what is in it..."
Though I wonder how you know what the popular topics in 1933 were. I mean, you forgot "The New Deal" so... Guessing you just grabbed the two biggest things. Though Hilter being a vogue topic seems odd given that he hasn't invaded anyone yet.
Regrettably, due mostly to government interventions and regulations, that practice is long gone.
https://www.tnp.no/norway/economy/5496-norway-is-heading-to-a-new-financial-crisis
Actually, you pay much more in taxes than do I, and there is no evidence you get more than I.
If you read my post again, I stated, "...in vogue topic."So years when laws were proposed or enacted weren't popular toics of talk? Well... How interesting.
1933-in vogue topic...fact check for you...world wide Great Depression, Hitler...not health care...
1949 - in vogue topic...fact check for you...The Marshall Plan...Cold War commencement...Korean Peninsula...not health care...
Medicare and Medicaid not dominant subject topic during the 60's...Vietnam War, Charles Manson, burning bras, Abby Hoffman...
Clinton HIPAA, piling on costs...
Obama ACA, "...we will need to pass it to see what is in it..."
Yeah, we will see...the way I hear things, Norway is going broke buster...Source? Because last I checked, we had a surplus AND a few Trillion NOK in savings.
Just in case you missed it...nothing is free, last I checked...Yes. We pay for it with taxes. Which isn't much more than you do. Its nice to get more than you for the same cost.
Actually fossil fuels have a HORRIBLE ROI.Your entire post is so full of misinformation, I don't where to begin...
Think about it: how long did it take for the oil or gas to initially form? Millions of years. We're literally just reaping what was started before humans existed. If it took a decade to grow a single stalk of corn to maturity, would corn have a good ROI? No.
Meanwhile: solar, wind, and hydro all generate power with energy absorbed between a few days(wind, hydro) and instantly(solar). Of course it takes billions of years for a star to form, but the sun will outlast the oil so....
I mean, even big oil companies are looking into wind, solar, hydro, wave power, etc... Because they know fossil fuels won't last forever.
Big oil is in the industries you mention to make money, period, so yeah...we will start there...
The only thing more efficiently producing energy than an internal combustion engine is a bicycle, so I will give you one to the side of green there...
Other than that, just like the climate change BS we read about ice caps melting and disappearing 5 years ago, we have read the same old BS about petrol running out since the mid 70's when jackalope Jimmy trotted out that BS.
Hold on, let me fact check that...First this:Well, regulation certainly didn't start in the 90's.
"The origins of this complex system lie in a series of turf wars between opposing interests that have been waged in one form or another over the past 150 years."
Which tells me it didn't start in the 90s.
But when did healthcare became the in vogue topic of the day?
Answer- the 90's.
IF you like high prices...
Which side are you arguing again?
Here is an argument against gun elimination:
Consider the drug market....
Heroin and crack are illegal and punishments for possession of even small amounts are extreme. Does anyone who wants heroin or crack have a hard time obtaining it? .... No. Even without money people seem to find a way to get it.
Suppose you outlaw guns... Do you think it will be enforced or eliminated any better than heroin or crack? No.
In fact, what will likely happen is that it will create an underground black market in which only criminals will be able to obtain guns because law abiding citizens will of course obey the law.
So, effectively that monopolizes guns for criminals. If I were trying to start a militia, I would be in favor of gun control because that ensures my enemy will have a difficult time arming themselves.
From the mouth of Trump.I don't see how stating facts is bad.Irrelevant. His reaction to a situation in the moment in no way dictates how he will tactically use the situation to further an agenda.
I guess you missed the part where he immediately began blaming Trump for the shooting.
Since you seem to have fallen into insanity, I guess we're done here.
So President Trump has never said how evil immigrants are? How bad mexicans are? How much they bring drugs and rape and murder into America?
I've only ever heard him talk about curbing illegal immigration and stopping criminals and drugs from entering our country. The "Mexican phobia" narrative is something that's been pushed by fringe left wing media, and seems to have caught on due to gullible people and those looking for any reason to hate Trump.
You sound like those people who say BLM is responsible for increased police violence. Next, you'll probably blame the 20+ mass shootings that happened during the last presidency on Obama.
I don't see how stating facts is bad.Irrelevant. His reaction to a situation in the moment in no way dictates how he will tactically use the situation to further an agenda.
I guess you missed the part where he immediately began blaming Trump for the shooting.
Since you seem to have fallen into insanity, I guess we're done here.
I don't see how stating facts is bad.Irrelevant. His reaction to a situation in the moment in no way dictates how he will tactically use the situation to further an agenda.
I guess you missed the part where he immediately began blaming Trump for the shooting.
That wasn't a laugh ya twit.
Thanks CNN, but that wasn’t even a subtle smirk. It was practically a full on guffaw. If you’re going to be dumb, don’t do it in the serious boards.
You think he was laughing at the shooting? Make your argument why then.
I’d say it’s more likely he laughed at himself, as a defense mechanism to not be vulnerable in front of fifty people because that’s a hard thing to do.
Because he’s a trained, professional speaker. They don’t get awkward in front of 50 people. And he’s already using it as political ammo for his campaign.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.politico.com/amp/story/2019/08/04/beto-orourke-trump-el-paso-white-nationalist-1445700
No.That wasn't a laugh ya twit.
Thanks CNN, but that wasn’t even a subtle smirk. It was practically a full on guffaw. If you’re going to be dumb, don’t do it in the serious boards.
1. Please name a regulation.Pick one of any.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730786/2. They lobby against regulations.
Which ones?Have you an example where they do not?
3. None of this explains the increased cost unless you say that all doctors, hospitals, and pharmasudical companies inflate their prices at the same time.
You didn't read the article, did you? It very well contradicts your entire argument. Good job.
QuoteAs far as your secret, you have a hard time convincing anyone that lower and middle class America is being destroyed, because that is the supposed audience this magical talking point is directed.
Trump's audience is not those people.
Wait, you're saying Trump's "audience" (as if he wasn't the entire country's President but whatever) is exclusively the rich and privileged?
These drug rings, btw, didn't go away. In fact, the end result of the crack down is that new, stronger drugs like fentanyl have made their ways in to fill the gap. This is why more and more are overdosing.... from illegal, black market fentanyl... not prescribed pills like hydrocodone.
