Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - xasop

Pages: < Back  1 ... 74 75 [76] 77 78 ... 123  Next >
1501
Our Federal Parliament has brought itself to new heights of abhorrence. In a shocking twist after the Government and Opposition joined forces to censor the Internet earlier this week, they've now passed a bill in response to a High Court challenge which gives them unlimited power to detain refugees offshore indefinitely in squalid conditions. Of course, they've already been doing this for years (it was a policy instituted by the previous government), but now they're concerned that the High Court might rule the practice as illegal, so they're rushing to cover their arses.

What really takes the cake is that not only the government, but also the Labor opposition voted down various amendments from the Greens and the Liberal Democrats to reduce the scope of the legislation, including blocking a stipulation that would impose mandatory reporting of child abuse in these facilities. This is something I would have expected from the Abbott government, but not from Labor.

It's hard to express the horrific profundity of this legislation, so here's a speech from Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young on the subject, which is well worth watching:



If this is the way the major parties want to play ball, we need big change, and fast.

1502
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Internet censorship in Australia
« on: June 23, 2015, 11:10:06 AM »
Pirate Party has a good write up on this. I doubt anyone, besides those already voting for minor party's, will care about these changes. They'll likely be easy enough to get around anyway.

It's the obvious disregard for the Australian people by both the government and opposition that grinds my gears, not the material effects of the legislation. This isn't an isolated case, either.

It wouldn't even bother me so much if Bill Shorten had the balls to side with the government on things that will actually help our economy, like some of their spending cuts. He has no vision of his own, spends Question Time taunting Abbott with petty squabbles, and then every time the government introduces a real stinker of a bill, he keels over and votes for it.

Worst opposition ever.

1503
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Internet censorship in Australia
« on: June 23, 2015, 09:43:53 AM »
Our two major parties have colluded in another spectacular violation of voter trust:

http://www.cnet.com/au/news/site-blocking-laws-pass-parliament-as-critics-slam-internet-filter/

The whole thing is a shocking display of blatant corruption, but there's one part in particular that stands out as putting Australia ahead of the pack in our government's disregard for their own people:

Quote
The Greens Senator also brought nine amendments to the bill on behalf of the Greens, including moves to refine the definition of "online locations" to not include VPNs, changes to the Copyright Act "to explicitly state that evading geo-blocking does not constitute copyright infringement" as well as the definitions of 'facilitating' copyright to ensure legitimate websites aren't caught in the net. Senator Ludlam also sought to include provisions to allow third-party appeals of website blocks.

These amendments were all voted down.

That is, the big wigs weren't even willing to consider amendments to make the bill less vague and facilitate recourse for blocked websites in their rush to pass it into law. This is a move with one purpose alone; to pander to wealthy copyright holders at the expense of Australian voters.

I hope voters respond to this by giving those who voted against the bill, such as the Greens and the Liberal Democrats, more power in the next election. Otherwise, we're headed for dark times ahead.

1504
Important update!

Custom-built behemoth
CPU: Intel Core i7-3770 quad-core w/hyperthreading @ 3.40 GHz
Approximate build time: 50 minutes

1505
Technology & Information / Re: Laptop Advice
« on: June 21, 2015, 06:12:23 PM »
Should I be concerned?  Is a wifi switch something that can be replaced relatively easily?  It was a fairly disheartening message.

I didn't even know they had a physical WiFi switch. I generally rely on the operating system to do the right thing with my networking. It's probably not a huge deal.

1506
Technology & Information / Re: OpenBSD
« on: June 21, 2015, 03:07:01 PM »
First post from my new OpenBSD installation!

Code: [Select]
steven@vader:~$ uname -a
OpenBSD vader.steven-mcdonald.id.au 5.8 GENERIC.MP#1078 amd64

1507
Technology & Information / Re: OpenBSD
« on: June 21, 2015, 08:06:29 AM »
I am now running Linux with /home mounted over NFS. I had to put somewhat more things than expected onto local storage in order to get decent performance, and I can't watch Stargate over NFS, but we'll see how things go otherwise. Hopefully I won't be booted into Linux very often from now on.

Time to try a reboot and see if things all shut down and come back up as expected.

1508
Technology & Information / Re: OpenBSD
« on: June 20, 2015, 06:27:09 PM »
I now have automated boot working with NFS mounts from an OpenBSD VM on Linux. The way it works is thus:

1. I boot and enter my passphrase to decrypt my Linux storage.
2. Before my login prompt comes up, a console VNC client starts attached to my OpenBSD VM so I can enter my passphrase to decrypt OpenBSD's storage.
3. A script waits for OpenBSD to come onto the network and start listening for NFS connections before allowing the NFS mounts to proceed.
4. Everything continues as normal, except all my files are now on OpenBSD.

Of course, OpenBSD boots work as normal without any of this, and I still have access to the same files. I rule.

1509
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Party Membership
« on: June 20, 2015, 04:34:55 PM »
I don't think modern progressivism is authoritarian.

It isn't, that's my whole point. The two are entirely independent; it's possible to be a progressive authoritarian just as much as it's possible to be a progressive liberal.

Also, how is feminism authoritarian?

Its original ideals are not. However, a lot of modern feminists like to propose ridiculous rules that silence men in order to achieve gender "balance".

1510
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Party Membership
« on: June 20, 2015, 04:46:43 AM »
The problem is that in this country, economics and morals have gotten all mixed and muddled. If you are a Conservative morally speaking, you are invariably a Republican. If you are a Liberal morally speaking, you are invariably a Democrat.

The terms "conservative" and "liberal" are fundamentally screwed up as well, even outside America. It's generally accepted that if you oppose gay marriage, for instance, you are a "conservative". Meanwhile, if you support it, you are a "liberal".

But there are those who want to force practitioners of marriage ceremonies to not be allowed to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation in order to achieve their goal. That's not liberalism at all. Then there's the fact that so many groups that have fought for their freedom in the past -- women and blacks, for instance -- are now most vocally advocated for by people who want to achieve domination over their perceived oppressors, rather than real freedom.

I don't see "conservative" and "liberal" as antonyms anymore. Conservative-progressive is one spectrum; authoritarian-liberal is another. You can be a conservative liberal (e.g., the many people who spoke out against the PATRIOT Act and similar legislation in other countries), and you can be a progressive authoritarian (e.g., modern feminism).

1511
Technology & Information / Re: OpenBSD
« on: June 19, 2015, 06:36:45 PM »
So, given that the bug that caused me to abandon this effort is now fixed, I've restarted this migration, with some important differences:

 - I'm reusing my old 2 TB hard drives as temporary storage instead of a USB drive, which seems to be performing better.
 - I'm running OpenBSD as a VM inside Linux rather than vice versa, which both allows me to continue to use Linux until OpenBSD is ready, and performs better due to Linux's support for VT-x.
 - I'm copying files over an NFS mount instead of hacking an SSH-based solution on top of what is already a fairly clumsy hack.

Hopefully, my data should be fully copied over to OpenBSD by the end of the weekend. I still need to figure out what to do with my backups before I commit to migrating, though.

1512
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Party Membership
« on: June 19, 2015, 09:02:47 AM »
I'm not a member of a party, but I've been considering joining for some time. The four parties I'd be most interested in joining are the Liberal Democrats, the Sex Party, the Pirate Party and the Future Party. They each have a substantial subset of policies that I can get behind.

I don't think I'd be up for going door-knocking, though. I suck at people skills, and would probably be more of a liability than an asset to the party. I'd much rather work on technical stuff behind the scenes.

1513
Technology & Information / Re: Laptop Advice
« on: June 18, 2015, 05:56:36 AM »
I am taking your advice. I ordered a second hand X201 with an i5 560M processor, 4GB RAM, 128GB SSD. Came in at 200CAD including shipping. Can't wait to get it and thanks!  Hope I didn't get ripped off!

Pretty much the same configuration as mine, except mine came with an HDD, which I then replaced with an SSD anyway because I'm a badass like that. Enjoy.

1514
Technology & Information / Re: My computer is a slut...
« on: June 18, 2015, 03:58:33 AM »
Have you tried installing OpenBSD?

1515
Technology & Information / Re: Laptop Advice
« on: June 18, 2015, 03:57:40 AM »
Buy a second-hand ThinkPad on eBay. They're some of the most reliable laptops out there, but they're pretty expensive to buy new from Lenovo (like 4-5 times your stated price range). I have an X201 I got from eBay, and aside from only having VGA in the way of video output, it's pretty sexy.

1516
Arts & Entertainment / Re: The Pink Floyd discography listen-through
« on: June 13, 2015, 05:49:17 PM »
Roger Waters
In the Flesh - Live
Concert film (directed by Ernie Fritz)

Recorded: 27 June 2000, Rose Garden Arena, Portland, Oregon
Released: 5 December 2000

Band

Roger Waters (guitar, bass)
Doyle Bramhall II (guitar)
Snowy White (guitar)
Andy Fairweather Low (guitar, bass)
Jon Carin (keyboards, lap steel, acoustic guitar)
Andy Wallace (keyboards)
Norbert Stachel (saxophone on "Set the Controls" and "Money")
Graham Broad (drums)

Katie Kissoon (backing vocals)
P. P. Arnold (backing vocals)
Susannah Melvoin (backing vocals)

All tracks authored by Roger Waters, except where noted.

Songs included (in order of appearance)

In the Flesh
The Happiest Days of Our Lives
Another Brick In the Wall (part II)
Mother
Get Your Filthy Hands Off My Desert
Southampton Dock
Pigs On the Wing (part I)
Dogs (Waters, Gilmour)
Welcome To the Machine
Wish You Were Here (Waters, Gilmour)
Shine On You Crazy Diamond (parts I, II, IV, VI and VIII) (Waters, Gilmour, Wright)
Set the Controls For the Heart of the Sun
Speak To Me (Mason)
Breathe (Waters, Gilmour, Wright)
Time (Waters, Gilmour, Wright, Mason)
 * Includes a reprise of "Breathe".
Money
5:06 AM (Every Stranger's Eyes)
Perfect Sense (parts I and II)
The Bravery of Being Out of Range
It's a Miracle
Amused To Death
Brain Damage
Eclipse
Comfortably Numb (Waters, Gilmour)
Each Small Candle

Review

This film, coincidentally recorded on my 11th birthday, documents Roger's In the Flesh tour. While it wasn't in support of any particular album, he was aiming to showcase Amused To Death, which never had its own tour. The four Amused songs are mixed in with a selection from all of his other albums, both with Pink Floyd and solo, since The Dark Side of the Moon. There is also one from A Saucerful of Secrets, and one previously unreleased. A pretty balanced set list all around.

The band is pretty solid, with a good mix of old and new blood. Snowy White is the most seasoned Floydian, having worked with the band as early as Animals. Jon Carin has joined Roger after his work with Gilmour-led Floyd, and rejoining Roger after working with him on K.A.O.S. are Andy Fairweather Low, Graham Broad and Katie Kissoon (who also appeared on Pros and Cons). P. P. Arnold had previously appeared on Amused To Death, while Doyle Bramhall II, Andy Wallace, Norbert Stachel and Susannah Melvoin are the true newcomers.

As usual, Roger has selected the most boring guitar player to play most of the lead parts, which for this tour is Doyle Bramhall II. The most interesting feature of his guitar playing is that he plays a right-handed guitar in left-handed style, so that the strings are the wrong way around. You can hear his chords being strummed from highest to lowest at times as a result. Thankfully, Snowy White also gets his fair share of lead parts, with Andy Fairweather Low also having a few moments in the spotlight.

The first few pieces are fairly routine, without much deviation from the album versions. The exception is Another Brick In the Wall, which somehow manages to sound even more boring here than it does on The Wall. The selections from The Final Cut are somewhat bizarre, as both Filthy Hands and Southampton Dock serve as little more than filler on that album. Something like The Fletcher Memorial Home would have fit in far better.

Things take a serious turn for the better once Roger picks up an acoustic guitar to play Pigs On the Wing. The band here recreates the entire side A of Animals, and the contribution Gilmour made to the Pink Floyd sound was never quite so appreciated as it is here. Clocking in at over 16 minutes, this version of Dogs features Doyle and Snowy harmonising together on the powerful guitar sections, looking very symmetrical with Doyle holding his guitar left-handed. Also, during the keyboard solo, Roger, Doyle, Snowy and Andy F all partake in a game of poker on stage while Graham, Jon and Andy W keep the song going and the irrelevant ladies watch from afar while sipping cocktails.

The Wish You Were Here section is mainly played as on the album, although Welcome To the Machine has a more steady beat, given the band's inability to rely so much on studio effects. I also find it interesting that Roger's arrangement of Shine On is much better than David's was for Pulse, due to a combination of Roger being much better at singing the lead vocal than David is, and stepping back to allow his band members some kickass improv during part VI (which segues in somewhat jarringly from the end of part IV).

Those part VI solos are one of the highlights of the entire film, with Jon Carin taking two solos (first on synth, then lap steel), followed by Doyle Bramhall II on guitar. Finally, Snowy White steps up and seems to challenge Doyle's tactics of relying on his chops to disguise his lack of talent by opening with a single, long note that says more than Doyle's entire solo. The segue into part VII, heralding the final verse, is just as powerful as on the album. This may be my all-time favourite Shine On live arrangement.

Pulling another rabbit out of his hat, or perhaps Snowy White's hat, Roger decides to bring back an old favourite of his that never quite did anything for me back in the '60s. Set the Controls has been transformed from psychedelic wankfest into Eastern-influenced rock 'n' roll, and while Norbert Stachel's sax solo seems kind of pointless, Snowy White livens up the piece with a very interesting and unexpected guitar solo. This is, without qualification, my favourite version of this song.

Next up comes the first of the Dark Side selections, which couldn't be more routine. Roger takes lead vocal on Time, a somewhat questionable decision, but ultimately it doesn't matter very much because the arrangement fails to produce anything of value anyway. The one high point is that Andy Fairweather Low takes a guitar solo in Money which can only be described as "explosive blues", played in that distinctive rhythm guitarist style that Lennon uses on "The End". Likewise for the Amused To Death section; Roger might as well have just put on the album and walked off stage for a while.

Brain Damage/Eclipse is another story. While it's still played very faithfully to the album version, it's noteworthy because it's substantially better than the Pulse version, on which David sounds like he's thinking about what to eat for lunch instead of focusing on the music. By contrast, you can tell that Roger is immediately engaged with the theme of these lyrics, and that makes all the difference.

The show finishes up with a better-than-average rendition of Comfortably Numb, made worthwhile for the guitar duel between Doyle and Snowy at the end (Snowy wins, of course). Then we get a horrific preview of the direction Roger's career is going in; Each Small Candle is a newly written song, in which Roger has discovered that if he repeats the same phrases and riffs over and over for nine minutes instead of three or four, he can bore even more people to sleep before the song finishes.

This performance is very inconsistent. When it's good, it's some of the best work Roger has released solo, but when it's bad, it's like The Final Cut all over again. This probably isn't worthwhile unless you already know you like the material being played, but if you are a Pink Floyd fan, it is most certainly essential. I enjoyed it.

1517
I guess what I don't understand, Parsifal, is how your argument is valid in a situation where the positive discrimination only serves to counteract negative discrimination? I agree that randomly giving one group an edge over the other is terrible from a free market economy, but we're starting at a place where one group already has an edge over the other. How can we get anywhere if we aren't willing to address that fundamental problem?

We can't. That's exactly my point:

Yes, it will take a long time, but that's not justification for a solution that gives some temporary relief without addressing the underlying problem.

I don't believe that providing incentives or requirements to improve employment opportunities for specific races will even begin to address the problem. I would expect it to make it worse, based on the fact that we already have some such programmes here, and they do exactly that.

If, as Parsifal says, all it took was waiting for the free market to do its job, we'd expect to see the wage gap decreasing on the scale of decades. We don't.

That's not what I said. I said we should provide them with financial support to improve their quality of life (and thus health, education and employability) as a temporary measure, and then let the free market take care of the rest. If that is true, then we would only expect to see that result if both of those things are currently the case wherever these data were recorded.

Does America currently provide financial support? Based on what I know of American society, you essentially treat your black population as "out of sight, out of mind", which is almost certainly not going to work wonders for fixing the problem. You can't expect a free market to do anything to fix a problem which is fundamentally rooted in a difference in quality of life.

Is the market in America currently free? It certainly isn't here; we already have programmes in place to give Aborigines preferential treatment in certain situations, and they have the effects I described previously of instilling laziness in Aboriginal workers and resentment in everyone else. I don't know enough about America's economy to say how true that is over there.

If this baseless speculation is true, and I think it probably is, then radical action is needed to change the current equilibrium. To apply this to Australia, this means that this referendum is, if not pleasant, then at least necessary.

I strongly disagree, even if your speculation is true. The Constitution, the highest law of all, is not the appropriate place to introduce discriminatory legislation, even if one's intent is pure. Social problems come and go, but the Constitution is something that defines our nation.

If any special treatment beyond financial support is necessary, and I strongly doubt it is, we should just pass an ordinary law to take care of it. Don't amend the Constitution for tomorrow based on today's problems.

1518
People should not be judged on their name. Certainly some people do decide to alter their names; and that's their choice. However, the fact that certain names are, due to racial origin, perceived negatively, should be all it takes for it to be admitted something needs to be done.

I hadn't seen that study before. The reason I haven't responded until now is that I wanted time to think it over.

I stand by what I said previously, that a free market is the best way to resolve these issues. Artificially increasing employment opportunities for a specific group of people is likely to have two immediate consequences: one, it increases resentment towards that group of people from those without that special privilege; and two, it encourages laziness if workers know they are employed for reasons other than their productivity. The latter both enhances the former and reduces overall productivity, which creates negative consequences both social and economic.

I'm aware that I've just asked you for a source for your claim, so I can't very well state my own as fact without one. I'll do some more research on this when I have time and see if I can find something to substantiate or refute it. But based on my intuition and experience, I believe that such a solution cannot be temporary because it enhances the problems it aims to solve; the only way to make such a solution sustainable is to provide ever-increasing benefits to that group of people, eventually making them nothing but a liability to society.

My preferred solution, as I said in my last post, would be to give the underprivileged financial benefits to enable better access to education and allow the free market to take care of the rest. Only by demonstrating that they are equally capable through skilled labour will they truly address the issue of social equality. Yes, it will take a long time, but that's not justification for a solution that gives some temporary relief without addressing the underlying problem. Shifting our problems onto our children is not an answer.

In any case, we're discussing a study involving racial discrimination in America, which may or may not be similar to the case in Australia. Regardless, the approach I would take is the same.

1519
Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Purgatory
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:28:47 AM »
Reforming a character troll? Really, guys?

Even if he is most likely a character troll, I don't think that's reason to treat him differently from anyone else. There have been people on FES in the past who everyone thought was a character troll, but turned out not to be (remember Eric Bloedow, anyone?). I really don't want to get into using a moderator's assessment of a person's motives as reason for a ban.

1520
It's been proven that it is harder for black people to, for example, get jobs

I would really like to see a source for this. My intuition is that they don't find it harder to get jobs because they're black, but for some economically-founded reason, such as having poorer education. If that is so, then their race is irrelevant, and we can treat the economic issue independently.

However, until you provide a citation for your claim, it's impossible to verify either position.

I suppose the question, for me, is: is it possible to end the racial economic disparities in Australia without discriminatory practices? If so, implementing them would be unethical. If not, failing to implement them would be unethical. Regardless, something ought to be done.

I disagree. If you provide financial support to the disadvantaged, then a free market will most likely self-normalise within a generation or so, which is the minimum time required for that financial support to translate into better health and education for new graduates. A market which is encumbered by anti-discrimination laws will never self-normalise, because such laws only serve to uphold the sense of injustice that fuels racial bias.

Consider yourself as an employer 12 years after such financial support is instituted, and you have two candidates applying for a job. You can choose a caucasian demanding a salary of $20/hour because she knows she can go next door and get the same job for the same pay otherwise, or one of the first Aboriginal graduates with the skills required to perform the job, who demands a salary of $15/hour because racial prejudice is still strong, and he's less confident in his employability. Both are equally capable. Which do you choose?

Now put yourself in the position of a white person looking for work. You see Aborigines getting hired at $15/hour by employees snatching up cheap labour, and find it more difficult to get work at your expected rate of $20/hour. What are you going to do to make yourself more employable?

The free market regulates itself through motivated self-interest, regardless of racial bias. A controlled market perpetuates those biases by providing incentives to act against one's own financial interest for the benefit of minority groups.

Pages: < Back  1 ... 74 75 [76] 77 78 ... 123  Next >