I think Flat earth map isn't wrong
Do you have one that can be used to calculated long range airplane flights?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I think Flat earth map isn't wrong
You assume that science just makes stuff up. We have been doing measured mass attraction experiments since the mid 1800's. Our present understanding of gravity and mass were derived from those experiments.I still query:You assume without evidence that there is a correlation between mass and gravitational pull.
- How the "gravitation" can exist between "other celestial bodies" and objects on earth
and not between the massive earth and objects on earth.
When traveling east your total velocity (velocity plus earth spin) is greater than when traveling due west (earth spin minus velocity). The centripetal acceleration is greater when traveling east resulting in lower measured weight. It's called the Eotvos Effect.The effects of gravity are also different when objects are in motion going east vs West and in motion at different latitudes.
Oh!? That's odd. What is the cause and effect of that one?
You are incorrect in your understanding of the role of atmospheric pressure and the measured weight of a object. An object of constant density and volume will weigh more when the air pressure decreases. The phenomenon is known as air buoyancy. There are correction formulas established to accommodate for this effect when doing mass calibrations. The less dense the object is the more pronounced the weight increase will be as elevation increases.Hello everyone.
I have a question for you all. I've been through the FAQ and, although the concept of gravity is discussed, I couldn't see any reference to this particular point.
Imagine that you're travelling around with an accurate accelerometer (a device which measures acceleration). At various places you stop and take a measurement, and after a while start to notice that these measurements differ from each other by a small amount. This shows that the strength of gravity is different at different places on the planet.
In classical physics this is well documented and can be explained by a number of different phenomena. For example, according to Newton's law of gravitation [F=G(Mm)/r^2] if you are at the top of a mountain, gravity should be slightly weaker than if you were at sea level. Also, the non-uniform mass density of the planet can account for some considerable variation, even if measurements are taken at the same altitude. In fact, the measurement you take can vary by as much as 0.7% from place to place.
Now, as I understand it (and do please correct me if I've got the wrong idea) you suggest that the flat Earth is being accelerated upwards at a constant 9.8m/s^2. Surely, if that were the case, the acceleration measured at any point on the planet would be exactly the same.
Thanks for taking the time to read this, and I look forward to hearing what you have to say. Please note, I'm not here as a troll, I just find the whole topic fascinating.
Firstly, the earth is stationary and doesn't move to anywhere. That knowledge is "old theory" and debunked several times, also by ourselves.
Most part believers accept the "gravity effect" as caused by atmospheric stringency. You may think it as atmospheric pressure. They are not same by phsically but are about same as effective.
In nature, everything pushes others, including atmospher. So when you are on a mountain, there is less atmospher upper side of you and so, it causes less force to down you. So the gravity is less.
In ground level, the atmospher on your upper side is more than the mountain level, so the gravity effect increases. Thats all.
You can explain every type of gravity effects by changing the atmospheric weight/or hight which effect to the object.
PS: I'm an engineer from 20 years.
And UA explains all that?We have also generated predictive formulas based on what we know about gravity that give measurable results.And that's how we know it doesn't work. It gives us measurably incorrect results when you start looking past the sort of stuff that's explainable within classical mechanics.
Because once you pass the moon that is overhead, don't you think it would appear differently?So you are saying that we are only looking at the bottom of the moon regardless of location? If it's only 3000 miles away how come you wouldn't see the other side of the moon at the extreme southern hemisphere? In reality we all see the same side of the moon and see the same phase which suggests that it's farther away than 3000 miles.
Since you like getting your education from YouTube here is one from a pilot explaining just why that would be.Please explain how it shows on the flat earth maps why it is a longer distance from Australia to south America than it is from uae to Australia? Also when I flew from Doha to Melbourne I flew over Indian ocean but you can't go that route on the flat earth map, the flat earth has you over India . also if you circumnavigate earth if it is a globe then it can travel in a straight path round and on flat earth you go in a circle so you stop going straight and start adding time and distance.? If maps wrong then how can it be fixed without changing distance between the different points?
A Taiwanese woman gave birth 6 hours into a flight from Bali to LAX, which is 19 hour flight. They had to make an emergency landing in Anchorage Alaska, which is a 23 hour flight from Bali to Alaska. 6 hours into a flight from Bali to LAX and you go over 2,000 miles off course to get to Alaska? That emergency landing doesn't make sense on a globe. It does on a Flat Earth map, though. On a Flat Earth map, Anchorage is in the middle of Bali and LAX.
I don't know if that proves anything, but it sure is suspicious.
What the video below or just google "Taiwanese woman gives birth on plane" and see for yourself.
Yes, but to to take accurate measurements one needs a screen that is larger than the beam so the center can be detected. Many flat earth experiments have failed for this reason. They assume that if they can see the laser that the center of the beam is at eye level.I think that the best way to determine wheter the earth has a curve is using a laser pointer and a table with measurements to notice how the laser goes "higher" the farter we move from its origin.Why use a laser with a beam that gets wider at farther distances? There is a thing that has been used to do this for nearly 100 years. It's call a theodolite. A used digital one can be acquired for under $500.
im just saying, even if the beam gets wider, it should be noted the change in height it still shows on the measurement object on would be using. And lasers are very potent, there are some that can reach to cockpits in comercial planes.
If someone was going to give me a $1,000,000,000,000 over 50 years I think the least I could do is fake some photos.Or build rockets and go into space.....Like every other space agency across the earth.
I think that the best way to determine wheter the earth has a curve is using a laser pointer and a table with measurements to notice how the laser goes "higher" the farter we move from its origin.Why use a laser with a beam that gets wider at farther distances? There is a thing that has been used to do this for nearly 100 years. It's call a theodolite. A used digital one can be acquired for under $500.