Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Roundy

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 36  Next >
1
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General
« on: Today at 03:01:58 PM »
Batman Beyond was successful enough that I wouldn't write the idea off completely, though it seems unlikely.

2
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Creation
« on: July 23, 2017, 12:51:20 AM »
I've always been of the opinion that the turtle defecated the Earth and farted the Heavens. Is that scientifically rigorous enough for you? To answer your second question, yes.

3
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 20, 2017, 08:57:18 PM »
]www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/07/20/trump-set-a-red-line-for-robert-mueller-and-now-mueller-has-reportedly-crossed-it/]

Fucking LOL. Mueller has been around the block, he understands what it means when a criminal tells him not to investigate something.

"Do you know why I pulled you over?"

"Not for what's in my trunk so you better not look in there!"

4
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 20, 2017, 08:50:42 PM »
www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/07/20/what-was-trump-talking-about-with-12-a-year-health-insurance/?sw_bypass=true&utm_term=.06d07f77925d

6 months into his presidency and it's still clear he has no fucking clue how health insurance works. Unbelievable. Oh but he amazed so many Senators about how phenomenal his understanding of the system is. I can believe they let him think that too, the fucking bootlickers. LOL

6
I notice that people are getting banned from this forum for posting low-content, however I also notice that some other people who post low-content don't get any bans. Is it because the rules apply to some and it does not apply to others?

Out of curiosity, who are all these people you've seen banned? That might help answer the question.

7
Flat Earth General / Re: Why is NASA sociopathic organisation?
« on: July 18, 2017, 09:04:33 PM »
It's hard to say why NASA is so sociopathic. Maybe it was beaten too much as a child, or maybe it wasn't punished enough when it did bad things. Or, maybe it's genetic. I'm not sure the nature/ nurture question has been satisfactorily answered in this regard, you'd probably have to talk to a psychologist for a definitive answer.

Thanks for your interest in FES!

I want to know why TFES thinks that NASA and all other space organisations are sociopathic.

Oh, then why did you ask a completely different question in the subject line?

The wiki has a lot to say on this subject. I recommend you check it out!

Do you think USA hates Iran because Iran has the picture of the true shape of the earth?

I think USA hates Iran because Iran hates USA; just a stab in the dark of course but jihads can be difficult to get over for even the most forgiving of nations.

8
Flat Earth General / Re: Why is NASA sociopathic organisation?
« on: July 18, 2017, 07:15:55 PM »
It's hard to say why NASA is so sociopathic. Maybe it was beaten too much as a child, or maybe it wasn't punished enough when it did bad things. Or, maybe it's genetic. I'm not sure the nature/ nurture question has been satisfactorily answered in this regard, you'd probably have to talk to a psychologist for a definitive answer.

Thanks for your interest in FES!

9
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 15, 2017, 07:36:54 PM »
Is your best argument entirely rooted in taking my hyperbole literally?
Ladies and gentlemen, SexWarrior!

10
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Zeteticism
« on: July 15, 2017, 02:04:59 AM »
Good afternoon folks!

I don't know if this is the right forum for this post, but it's the one I usually hang out in. Apologies if it belongs somewhere else.

I'm interested in learning a bit about the zetetic method. I hadn't ever heard of zeteticism before discovering this website, and research around it hasn't been super fruitful for me, so the only information I have about it is what I've read on the front page and wiki.

What I gather, then, is that it's different from science in that it postulates no hypotheses, merely makes observations and then seeks to explain those observations. So the great Rowbotham observed that the surfaces of bodies of water are flat, and concluded that therefore the Earth must be flat.
Dandy.
But beyond that, I don't see the principles of zeteticism being applied. I observe the sun sinking towards, and then gradually disappearing behind, the horizon every evening. It then rises from behind the (roughly) opposite horizon the next morning.These observations would lead me to conclude that the sun travels around the Earth on a daily cycle, or else that the Earth itself revolves. The fine minds on this forum and elsewhere have worked out the mechanics of refraction, and the magnification of light through dense media, which is commendable work, but isn't postulating the existence of such phenomena a scientific, rather than a zeteticism, practice?

What am I missing?

PS. Sorry if my spelling is a bit mad, I'm typing this on a phone and am at the mercy of autocorrect

Well, once it's been proven that the Earth is flat, it remains to be explained why the sun behaves as you describe, which Rowbotham did. Perhaps you should read Earth Not a Globe.

11
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republican Health Care Bill
« on: July 14, 2017, 04:13:04 PM »
It seems you pay the most and get the least!

Like we need to be reminded. >:(

13
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republican Health Care Bill
« on: July 13, 2017, 08:20:50 PM »
I would suggest to all,,  As far as healthcare is involved,,   To research the natural alternatives as opposed to this care system only dealing with your symptoms...
You will be surprised what you find...
Cancer for one,,   has some 30 different effective remedies taken from the alternative...   Latrile, or vitamin B17 from apricot kernels being one of them..

Thanks for the advice but we're all aware of how shockingly easy it is to cure cancer.

forum.tfes.org/index.php?topic=3192.0

14
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 13, 2017, 06:14:01 PM »
Crisis Averted.
You can blame Obama now.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/341788-exclusive-doj-let-russian-lawyer-into-us-before-she-met-with-trump

No Trump is at fault anymore for this whole thing.  It was all Obama's fault for letting her in.

Memespiracy time! What if they let her in with the specific purpose of goading a member of Trump's team into collusion? Ooooooh...

15
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 12, 2017, 11:17:39 PM »
Calm down Saddam, he's just trolling.

16
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 12, 2017, 03:34:49 PM »
Kushner was led to believe she was a lawyer for the Russian government, though, right, in these E-mails?
We don't know that, but it seems reasonable to assume that Trump Jr. would let us know if he thought otherwise at the time of the meeting.

And all of this is still shady as all get out even if it doesn't turn out to be illegal. The E-mails allude to Russian government support for the Trump campaign, which at the time Trump was calling outrageous lies. And which many supporters were mocking as a leftist conspiracy theory. This E-mail definitely seems to move the collusion from leftist conspiracy to at least plausible.
I mostly agree, although as one of the people who mocked the conspiracy theory, I feel there's an element of a misunderstanding there. Many of us were in favour of investigating potential Trump-Russia collusion, but we did (and still do) dismiss the actual left-wing conspiracy theory under which Trump is nothing but Putin's puppet under some weird reverse Soviet Union situation.

Gary and Tom are mostly correct. Nothing criminal has been revealed yet. We already know that stating an intent to collude is not grounds for stumping the Trump. We've tested that one when Trump loudly invited the Russians to obtain and release Hillary's emails.

The lame duck prediction, however, I profoundly disagree with. Like, lol breaking news Lindsay Graham is screeching about Trump. Again. But this time it totally means something. Yep.

Also:

Not really, actually Tom reacted exactly like I expected. I was just trying to get a rise out of him. I still have no interest debating a troll whose only interest is trying to justify everything this administration does.
"jokes on you i was only pretending!!!!"

Roundy, leave this to the professionals, you're making yourself look silly.

That's not close to what I said but ok whatevs bb XOXOX

17
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 12, 2017, 01:05:28 PM »
Gary and Tom are mostly correct. Nothing criminal has been revealed yet. We already know that stating an intent to collude is not grounds for stumping the Trump. We've tested that one when Trump loudly invited the Russians to obtain and release Hillary's emails.

The lame duck prediction, however, I profoundly disagree with. Like, lol breaking news Lindsay Graham is screeching about Trump. Again. But this time it totally means something. Yep.

Also:

This is so big even Tom seems flustered trying to justify it, LOL
Read the literature, Tom, it's all there. I'm not going to do your research for you.
Damn, you change your tune quickly when confronted.

Not really, actually Tom reacted exactly like I expected. I was just trying to get a rise out of him. I still have no interest debating a troll whose only interest is trying to justify everything this administration does.

Also I never said Dunce Jr broke the law so he never actually confronted me over anything I said. Tom's just Tommin' as usual.

18
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 12, 2017, 03:26:44 AM »
I like to think there's a tipping point, but what that point would need to be has already reached shocking levels. Who knows?

19
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 11, 2017, 11:42:49 PM »
Read the literature, Tom, it's all there. I'm not going to do your research for you.

20
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 11, 2017, 11:16:00 PM »
It's called opposition research, and everyone does it. Hillary's team met with the russians peddling the Trump-Stripper-Pee story. How is this any different?

The problem is that Opposition Research does not allow foreign governments to provide that information.  Especially as support on behalf of said government.

The lawyer in question is not a foreign government agent.


http://www.npr.org/2017/07/11/536648394/emails-show-trump-jr-knew-russia-was-working-to-support-trump-campaign

To quote the e-mail that he received:
Quote
This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump - helped along by Aras and Emin.

Quote
Don
Hope all is well.
Emin asked that I schedule a meeting with you and The Russian government attorney who is flying over from Moscow for this Thursday.

Literally saying that they are doing this on behalf of the Russian Government and that she IS a Russian government attorney.

If an undercover cop asks if I want illegal drugs and I say yes and meet with him to buy said drugs, is that suddenly not illegal because it wasn't real drugs I was about to buy nor the dealer a real drug dealer?

And the email actually says that it's part of the Russian government's attempts to influence the election in Trump's favor. As Dave points out, the salient point is that Dunce Jr thought he was meeting with a representative of the Russian government. Also relevant is that it proves the Trump camp knew about the Russians' attempt to influence the election all while they vehemently denied it and cast it as a silly attempt by the Left to delegitimize Trump's presidency (as it turned out Dunce Jr has now done exactly that without even needing the Left's help!)

This is so big even Tom seems flustered trying to justify it, LOL

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 36  Next >