Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Rama Set

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 151  Next >
1
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Modern Feminism
« on: June 25, 2017, 09:53:44 PM »
Yeah, he has been very critical of Sarkeesian. But to have an outspoken anti-harassment, anti-bullying advocate use her platform as a panelist to start slinging insults at an audience member seems hypocritical in the extreme.

word, i can totally see what you mean.  tbh neither of them seems like they'd be much fun at a party.

in her defense, i think there's a difference between the kind of harassment she's rallying against and calling someone a name at a conference.  i don't think her advocacy reduces to 'never be mean, ever.'  i think it's more like 'please stop threatening to rape me every time i play a video game or make a blog post.'  which, to rooster's point, would probably get frustrating.

She has actually specifically referenced almost exactly the same type of attacks as the biggest segment of the problem. I think she calls them "you suck" comments.

2
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Modern Feminism
« on: June 25, 2017, 05:57:09 PM »
Maybe he needs a safe space where the mean feminists won't be able to hurt his butt anymore.

Fuck off Saddam

3
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Modern Feminism
« on: June 25, 2017, 04:16:17 PM »
i dunno who these folks are, so maybe i misunderstood the context, but the quote i read seemed to be talking about him being a shit head because of the stuff he says on his blogs or videos or whatever.

Yeah, he has been very critical of Sarkeesian. But to have an outspoken anti-harassment, anti-bullying advocate use her platform as a panelist to start slinging insults at an audience member seems hypocritical in the extreme.

4
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Modern Feminism
« on: June 25, 2017, 03:34:22 PM »
i kinda doubt that she'd characterize it that way

The video evidence presented thus far certainly shows a one-sided conversation.

5
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Modern Feminism
« on: June 25, 2017, 12:25:58 PM »
Anita Sarkeesian took time out of her duties as a panelist at VidCon to call Sargon of Akkad "human garbage" and a "shit head".  His crime?  Watching her quietly.  Glad she is standing up against the evils of harassment.

6
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: June 24, 2017, 03:40:03 PM »
Except Obama did do lots of things about it. So more bullshit.

7
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: June 24, 2017, 02:45:53 PM »
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/878413313188802560

So does this mean there was meddling fo sho then?

Read some of the comments. This is not even news as it was made public well before the election.

8
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: June 23, 2017, 03:18:26 PM »
Right, but the use of an end-to-end encryption solution does not inherently prevent archival. It might be the case that these messages are currently not being archived appropriately, but we have yet to see whether or not that's the case.

This sounds like part of the recent assault on end-to-end encryption, in which a few seemingly tyrannical groups are trying to spread distrust around the subject of cybersecurity. It's a bit scary tbh

I can see an argument for POTUS not using end-to-end encryption but I am not sure how far down the chain of his staff that transparency must go. It seems that Trump isn't specifically being targeted but rather his staff. Shit, maybe his staff uses encryption to protect themselves from their boss. I can imagine they don't feel super comfortable venting their frustrations in Trump's employ.

9
Alright, I wont bother trying to change your mind. Good luck out there.

10
When the interference is detected in a Sagnac experiment you have a rotating frame which is... Non-inertial!  Looks like SR is not even relevant. Fortunately GR can explain the result.

When the interference is NOT detected in the Sagnac experiment (when stationary) you have the rotating EARTH!!! which is even non-inertial system then ALSO in this case the SR is not even relevant. Un-Fortunately for you the GR theory is only crap.. xD

Sorry this is tough for you. The Earth is it rotating with respect to the detector since their motion is identical, hence it is inertial. If you can't properly analyze an FOR, perhaps you shouldn't be so quick to discard the work of actual scientists.

Tell me, how the MM experiment should be interpreted. When you consider the observations of astronauts and satellites of the Earth's motion I think you must reconsider your silly conclusions.

In the M-Gale experiment has been simulated the earth's angular-speed and in THAT case the interferences were DETECTED!!! (as born coordinates confirms) then if the EARTH is rotating the M-m experiments MUST have wrong results... try to research in the right way please....
[/quote]

Considering how fundamentally and grievously flawed your thinking on Sagnac was, I'm not looking in to this yet.

11
I am pretty sure warning Katy Perry was Junker's portfolio. He did a nice job too. Thanks for taking part in it.

12
When the interference is detected in a Sagnac experiment you have a rotating frame which is... Non-inertial!  Looks like SR is not even relevant. Fortunately GR can explain the result.

Tell me, how the MM experiment should be interpreted. When you consider the observations of astronauts and satellites of the Earth's motion I think you must reconsider your silly conclusions.

13
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: No Religion= Peace
« on: June 17, 2017, 03:39:26 PM »
Tribalism and scarcity of resources causes conflict and religion enables tribalism.

14
Therefore and somesuch.

15
Oh Wikipedia! Now I'm definitely ignoring the actual physicists I consulted.

So you and your "actual physicists" prefer ignorance spreads rather than intervening .. wonderful LoL

Just because you believe SR has been falsified by a misinterpretation of the Sagnac effect and a one-time, never reproducible result in the Michaelson-Morley experiment, doesn't make you correct.

But please tell me more about how SR has been falsified.

16
You can't spell "inertial", so I am not sure why I should take your word for this.

Yes it's Latin... the language of science..  as you know :-X

Not for a few hundred years, but carry on.

Quote
I consulted actual physicists on the topic.

then WHY they refuse to correct or erase this public topic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagnac_effect

Oh Wikipedia! Now I'm definitely ignoring the actual physicists I consulted.

17
hi Rama Set,

Sagnac & Michelson Morley 's experiments have proven that the light is indipendent from the inerzial system where it's traleving through refuting the einstein's special relativity theory therefore the Setec Astronomy's questions are absolutelly legits. congrats ;-)

You can't spell "inertial", so I am not sure why I should take your word for this. I consulted actual physicists on the topic.

18
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Official Sports Thread
« on: June 15, 2017, 12:29:04 AM »
MacGregor KOs Mayweather in the 3rd round.

19
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: June 14, 2017, 05:40:53 PM »
how could the democrats force trump to fire mueller.  that makes no sense.

By having Mueller staff his team with clearly partisan lawyers and known DNC supporters. They are posturing up for a major witch hunt that they only hope drags out until the midterms. Finding anything is secondary to just muddying the waters and trying to build a Trump obstruction of justice case.

But hey, you just follow the evidence with a #openmind

20
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Modern Feminism
« on: June 14, 2017, 10:24:54 AM »
I think this is just more of the shit show of intersectionality.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 151  Next >