Who is responsible for fixing errors in it by the way?
No one is "responsible" for it, but I'm the one that generally does it. Bear in mind that I'm generally uninterested in RE'ers whining about how they don't like FET, but if you've found any clerical errors, hit me up.
Well, the one error I found (which isn't really that important) is that it says that a photo is of the ice cliff - when in fact it's a photo of a free-floating iceberg. But it's hardly worth fixing.
My point being that if you personally believe in what it says - then you should be able to explain some of the things that it says that don't match reality.
The difficulty with debate here is that no two FE'ers seem to believe in the exact same set of things - so when an RE'er tries to prove a point - and you say "Go look in the Wiki" - it's typically explaining a point of view that even many FE proponents don't agree with.
For example, the map that's in the Wiki isn't remotely similar to the one that Tom Bishop currently proposes. Many of the explanations for things such as motion of sun and moon and that kind of thing don't work for Tom's map.
But it's hard to pin these things down when one person (you mostly) say "Look in the Wiki" and other FE'ers are (in effect) saying "The Wiki is wrong".
I myself run a couple of Wiki's (one for a car club) and I know how much work it can be to try to keep everything up to date - and although I mostly disagree about what the Wiki says, it is at least tidy and easy on the eyes...and for that you deserve a degree of respect.